IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v134y2023ics0264837723003526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the effectiveness, practicality and cost effectiveness of mitigation measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from intensively cultivated peatlands

Author

Listed:
  • Rhymes, Jennifer M.
  • Arnott, David
  • Chadwick, David R.
  • Evans, Christopher D.
  • Jones, David L.

Abstract

Peatlands drained for agriculture are among the most intensive sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the land-use sector. Policy decisions on the most effective strategies to reduce GHG emissions in line with Paris Agreement goals, alongside strategies that can halt any ongoing soil and biodiversity losses, are hindered by a lack of understanding on how proposed mitigation measures are likely to be received by the farming sector. Research has identified effective GHG reduction measures, but successful on-farm adoption of these measures is contingent upon farmer perceptions of the relative practicality of implementing the measures, and the economic impact that adoption will have on the farm business. In this study, Best–Worst Scaling, a discrete choice survey method, was utilised to elicit expert (climate change, policy and biodiversity) and farmer opinion on the relative effectiveness, practicality and level of economic cost of mitigation measures that can reduce GHG emissions at the farm level. The method enabled individual mitigation measures to be ranked by effectiveness (expert opinion), practicality and economic cost (farmer opinions). There were no measures ranked as both effective and practical, or effective with low cost, but there were measures ranked by farmers as practical and low cost to implement. These included: more effective nutrient management, reduced or no tillage, the installation of buffer zones, increased fossil fuel efficiency and the optimisation of irrigation systems. The strong divergence of ‘effective’ measures on the one hand, and ‘practical’ and ‘economic’ measures on the other, highlights the major challenges involved in reducing high GHG emissions from agricultural organic soils. Resolving these challenges will require a combination of financial mechanisms to compensate farmers for higher costs and/or reduced yields, engagement and advice to support farmers in adopting changes in management practice, and agricultural innovation and adaptation to maintain overall food production and economic viability. If these challenges are overcome, more sustainable landscape management on agricultural lowland peat could make significant contributions to achieve national and international climate change targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Rhymes, Jennifer M. & Arnott, David & Chadwick, David R. & Evans, Christopher D. & Jones, David L., 2023. "Assessing the effectiveness, practicality and cost effectiveness of mitigation measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from intensively cultivated peatlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723003526
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723003526
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Nicola Tubiello & Riccardo Biancalani & Mirella Salvatore & Simone Rossi & Giulia Conchedda, 2016. "A Worldwide Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Drained Organic Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Glenk, Klaus & Eory, Vera & Colombo, Sergio & Barnes, Andrew, 2014. "Adoption of greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture: An analysis of dairy farmers' perceptions and adoption behaviour," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 49-58.
    3. Bin Duan & Chi Zhou & Chengyu Zhu & Yifei Yu & Gaoyang Li & Shihua Zhang & Chao Zhang & Xiangyun Ye & Hanhui Ma & Shen Qu & Zhiyuan Zhang & Ping Wang & Shuyang Sun & Qi Liu, 2019. "Model-based understanding of single-cell CRISPR screening," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Kløve, Bjørn & Berglund, Kerstin & Berglund, Örjan & Weldon, Simon & Maljanen, Marja, 2017. "Future options for cultivated Nordic peat soils: Can land management and rewetting control greenhouse gas emissions?," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 85-93.
    5. Rajagopal, 2019. "Understanding Market Environment," Springer Books, in: Contemporary Marketing Strategy, chapter 0, pages 67-97, Springer.
    6. Oecd, 2019. "Understanding online consumer ratings and reviews," OECD Digital Economy Papers 289, OECD Publishing.
    7. J. Leifeld & L. Menichetti, 2018. "The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey Sirin & Maria Medvedeva & Vladimir Korotkov & Victor Itkin & Tatiana Minayeva & Danil Ilyasov & Gennady Suvorov & Hans Joosten, 2021. "Addressing Peatland Rewetting in Russian Federation Climate Reporting," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Kate Dooley & Ellycia Harrould‐Kolieb & Anita Talberg, 2021. "Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 34-44, April.
    3. Sari, Dwi Amalia & Margules, Chris & Lim, Han She & Widyatmaka, Febrio & Sayer, Jeffrey & Dale, Allan & Macgregor, Colin, 2021. "Evaluating policy coherence: A case study of peatland forests on the Kampar Peninsula landscape, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Jonas Volungevicius & Kristina Amaleviciute-Volunge, 2023. "A Conceptual Approach to the Histosols Profile Morphology as a Risk Indicator in Assessing the Sustainability of Their Use and Impact on Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Zhang, Wei & Valencia, Andrea & Gu, Lixing & Zheng, Qipeng P. & Chang, Ni-Bin, 2020. "Integrating emerging and existing renewable energy technologies into a community-scale microgrid in an energy-water nexus for resilience improvement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Kim, Woojung & Wang, Xiaokun Cara, 2022. "The adoption of alternative delivery locations in New York City: Who and how far?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 127-140.
    7. Van Loo, Ellen J. & Caputo, Vincenzina & Lusk, Jayson L., 2020. "Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Michael Manton & Evaldas Makrickas & Piotr Banaszuk & Aleksander Kołos & Andrzej Kamocki & Mateusz Grygoruk & Marta Stachowicz & Leonas Jarašius & Nerijus Zableckis & Jūratė Sendžikaitė & Jan Peters &, 2021. "Assessment and Spatial Planning for Peatland Conservation and Restoration: Europe’s Trans-Border Neman River Basin as a Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-27, February.
    9. Worden, David & Hailu, Getu, 2020. "Do genomic innovations enable an economic and environmental win-win in dairy production?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Georgiana Moiceanu & Mirela Nicoleta Dinca, 2021. "Climate Change-Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis and Forecast in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Yixin Nong & Changbin Yin & Xiaoyan Yi & Jing Ren & Hsiaoping Chien, 2020. "Farmers’ Adoption Preferences for Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Havrda, Marek & Klocek, Adam, 2023. "Well-being impact assessment of artificial intelligence – A search for causality and proposal for an open platform for well-being impact assessment of AI systems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Zhaowei Yu & Qi Wang & Qichen Zhang & Yawen Tian & Guo Yan & Jidong Zhu & Guangya Zhu & Yong Zhang, 2024. "Decoding the genomic landscape of chromatin-associated biomolecular condensates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Sabates-Wheeler, Rachel & Barker, Jeremy P., 2024. "The place of religious inequalities within international development and humanitarian response frameworks: Lessons from Iraq," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Zweigle, Tanja & Hellinghausen, Paul, 2021. "Relevanz und Potential von TikTok für die Social-Media-Marketing-Strategie von Unternehmen," IU Discussion Papers - Marketing & Communication 01 (Dez. 2021), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    16. Elena A. Mikhailova & Hamdi A. Zurqani & Christopher J. Post & Mark A. Schlautman & Gregory C. Post, 2021. "Soil Diversity (Pedodiversity) and Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-34, March.
    17. Xuting Yang & Wanqiang Yao & Pengfei Li & Jinfei Hu & Hooman Latifi & Li Kang & Ningjing Wang & Dingming Zhang, 2022. "Changes of SOC Content in China’s Shendong Coal Mining Area during 1990–2020 Investigated Using Remote Sensing Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Angela Maria D’Uggento & Alfonso Piscitelli & Nunziata Ribecco & Germana Scepi, 2023. "Perceived climate change risk and global green activism among young people," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(4), pages 1167-1195, October.
    19. Traxler, Emilia & Li, Tongzhe, 2020. "Agricultural Best Management Practices, A summary of adoption behaviour," Working Papers 305271, University of Guelph, Institute for the Advanced Study of Food and Agricultural Policy.
    20. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2024. "Peatland restoration in Germany: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723003526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.