IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v117y2022ics0264837722001375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of land and property development models, and stakeholders: A case of National Capital Region, India

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, Ashish
  • Tiwari, Piyush

Abstract

With urbanization, successful land development has become critical for the growth of the cities. Land administration plays an important role in the outcome of land and property development models. Land and property development requires close coordination between public and private sectors and has impact on various stakeholders including public authority, private developers, landowners, home-buyers and society. In addition to land development, which has it's characteristic and price mechanism separate from property development, this paper looks at property development to provide a holistic approach to urban development. We examine three cases of land and property development models across different cities within a single regional planning area called the National Capital Region (NCR) in India. Firstly, we look at the National Capital Territory of Delhi (Delhi) that has for years adopted public sector model of land development, however, with limited success. Delhi has recently experimented with land pooling to unlock large peri-urban areas in the fringe. Secondly, Gurugram (Haryana) hailed as ‘Millennium City’ has been able to achieve high decadal real estate growth with Public-Private land development, but there is a cost to this fast growth to the society that results in severe planning and infrastructure bottlenecks. Lastly, we look at the Public land development model of Noida (Uttar Pradesh), which is distinct from Delhi and Gurugram, and has been able to provide one of the best infrastructures in NCR. But due to its pro-developer land allotment policy, it has created a city with several stalled projects that have resulted in the loss of home equity for home-buyers. These contrasting land development models when studied with property development models within the same geographical region provide key insights for policymakers, planners, city governments and academic fraternity.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, Ashish & Tiwari, Piyush, 2022. "An analysis of land and property development models, and stakeholders: A case of National Capital Region, India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:117:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722001375
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722001375
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patil, Vikram & Ghosh, Ranjan & Kathuria, Vinish & Farrell, Katharine N., 2020. "Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners’ choices for compensation under land acquisition in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Muñoz Gielen, Demetrio & Mualam, Nir, 2019. "A framework for analyzing the effectiveness and efficiency of land readjustment regulations: Comparison of Germany, Spain and Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. O’Brien, Philip & Lord, Alex & Dembski, Sebastian, 2020. "How do planners manage risk in alternative land development models? An institutional analysis of land development in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Rao, Jyoti, 2019. "A ‘capability approach’ to understanding loses arising out of the compulsory acquisition of land in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 70-84.
    5. Ghatak, Maitreesh & Mitra, Sandip & Mookherjee, Dilip & Nath, Anusha, 2013. "Land Acquisition and Compensation in Singur: What Really Happened?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 121, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    6. Shoshana R. Goldstein, 2016. "Planning the Millennium City: The politics of place-making in Gurgaon, India," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 19(1), pages 12-27, March.
    7. Jatinder S. Bedi, 2014. "Background Paper on Issues Related to Land Economics," NCAER Working Papers 105, National Council of Applied Economic Research.
    8. Valtonen, Eero & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: Comparison of public and private land development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 481-492.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zakharov, Konstantin & Mizgajski, Andrzej, 2024. "Socioeconomic and political settings for the land development decreasing urban green. Inside view from Moscow," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jyoti Shukla & Piyush Tiwari, 2022. "Measuring Inadequacy in Compensation for the Compulsory Acquisition of Land: Evidence from Bengaluru, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Kumar, Pankaj & Kumar, Parveen & Garg, Ramesh Kumar, 2021. "A study on farmers' satisfaction and happiness after the land sale for urban expansion in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Demetrio, Muñoz Gielen & Francisco, Blanc Clavero & Burcher, James Corbet & Juan Felipe, Pinilla, 2023. "The role of jurisprudence in public value capture in urban development: A comparative analysis from Dutch, English, Spanish and Colombian courts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Melissa Candel, 2021. "Using Sustainability-Oriented Developer Obligations and Public Land Development to Create Public Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Shafi, Ahsan & Wang, Zhanqi & Ehsan, Muhsan & Riaz, Faizan Ahmed & Ali, Muhammad Rashid & Xu, Feng, 2023. "A game theory approach to land acquisition conflicts in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Broitman, Dani & Ben-Haim, Yakov, 2022. "Forecasting residential sprawl under uncertainty: An info-gap analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Korthals Altes, Willem K., 2019. "Planning initiative: Promoting development by the use of options in Amsterdam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 13-21.
    9. Xuefei Ren, 2017. "Land acquisition, rural protests, and the local state in China and India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 25-41, February.
    10. Le Bivic, Camille & Melot, Romain, 2020. "Scheduling urbanization in rural municipalities: Local practices in land-use planning on the fringes of the Paris region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Chuansong Zhao & Ran Geng & Jianxu Liu & Liuying Peng & Woraphon Yamaka, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Land Development: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Paul, Saumik & Sarma, Vengadeshvaran, 2014. "Are special economic zones a curse on those "chosen" to be evicted? : evidence form West Bengal, India," IDE Discussion Papers 472, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    13. Guo, Jingpeng & Zhao, Yinghui & Li, Frank Yonghong & Mao, Kebiao & He, Jinfeng & He, Qiang, 2024. "Developing a land development compensation model for returned land in tract expropriation: Towards a unified urban-rural land market in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Nir Mualam & Andreas Hendricks & Vida Maliene & Eyal Salinger, 2021. "Value Capture and Vertical Allocations of Public Amenities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Rao, Jyoti, 2019. "A ‘capability approach’ to understanding loses arising out of the compulsory acquisition of land in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 70-84.
    16. Qingmu Su & Kaida Chen & Lingyun Liao, 2021. "The Impact of Land Use Change on Disaster Risk from the Perspective of Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Le, Kien & Nguyen, My, 2019. "The Impacts of Farmland Expropriation on Vietnam's Rural Households," MPRA Paper 101397, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Puustinen, Tuulia & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Falkenbach, Heidi, 2022. "Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    19. Meher Bhagia & Mallika Bose, 2024. "Who owns the city? Neoliberal urbanism and land purchases in Gurgaon, India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 445-461, February.
    20. Goździewicz-Biechońska, Justyna & Brzezińska-Rawa, Anna, 2022. "Protecting ecosystem services of urban agriculture against land-use change using market-based instruments. A Polish perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:117:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722001375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.