IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v116y2022ics0264837722000771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid urbanization, land pooling policies & the concentration of wealth

Author

Listed:
  • Kresse, Klaas
  • van der Krabben, Erwin

Abstract

The research discusses how land pooling policies can become part of predisposed institutional frameworks that support processes of land ownership concentration when embedded in the complex, multilayered context of governmental coordination. Land pooling policies are being promoted by international organizations, the New Urban Agenda (NUA) and other best-practice literature for their potential to supply urban land and utilize part of the land value increment from urbanization to cover the costs for infrastructure, public facilities and construction. In this literature land pooling policies are characterized as equitable land policies because they proportionally distribute the development gain back to the original landowners. However, land pooling policies are no ‘silver bullet’ for an equitable urbanization. Depending on the institutionalization in the larger framework of national policies, land pooling policies might become included into processes of ground rent dispossession when embedded in the context of overlaying policies with contradictory objectives on diverse governance levels. This can support land transactions that in sum lead to a concentration of land ownership. The research analyses the case of the Republic of Korea, where land pooling policies have been the dominating land policies during the period of rapid urbanization in order to reveal new knowledge on the distributional characteristics of those policies in practice. The study makes clear how government coordination in the narrow perspective (land pooling policies) and in the wide perspective (national planning policies) affects the key transaction dimensions (land values, information impactedness and financing) which causes the diffusion of the equitable character of land pooling policies. The findings are valuable for the academic discourse as well as the best practice literature. Based on the findings the study closes with a set of recommendations for a more equitable implementation of land pooling policies that might be valuable for policy makers, planners, and academics especially in countries that are confronted with the challenges of rapid urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Kresse, Klaas & van der Krabben, Erwin, 2022. "Rapid urbanization, land pooling policies & the concentration of wealth," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:116:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000771
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722000771
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyun-Hoon LEE & Minsoo LEE & Donghyun PARK, 2012. "Growth Policy and Inequality in Developing Asia: Lesson from Korea," Working Papers DP-2012-12, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    2. Yoon-jung Kim & Mack Joong Choi, 2015. "Why have big construction companies replaced real estate developers in Korea?," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 206-223, July.
    3. Hoogerwerf, Andries, 1990. "Reconstructing policy theory," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 285-291, January.
    4. Klaas Kresse & Erwin van der Krabben, 2021. "Housing Supply Limitations, Land Readjustment and the Ecological Performance of the Urban Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Kang-Kook Lee, 2012. "Growth And Inequality In Korea," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Jinjun Xue (ed.), Growth with Inequality An International Comparison on Income Distribution, chapter 6, pages 121-137, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Chris Webster & Lawrence W.-C. Lai, 2003. "Property Rights, Planning and Markets," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2625.
    7. Deininger, Klaus & Olinto, Pedro, 2000. "Asset distribution, inequality, and growth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2375, The World Bank.
    8. Bertrand Renaud, 1989. "COMPOUNDING FINANCIAL REPRESSION WITH RIGID URBAN REGULATIONS: Lessons of the Korean Housing Market," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 3-22, January.
    9. Elizabeth Stanton & Peter Rosset & James Boyce, 2005. "Land Reform and Sustainable Development," Working Papers wp98, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sasu, Alexander & Javed, Arshad & Imran, Muhammad & Squires, Graham, 2024. "Land banking, land price and Ghana’s informal land markets: A relational complexity approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Armands Auzins & Peter Brokking & Evelin Jürgenson & Peteris Lakovskis & Jenny Paulsson & Andis Romanovs & Jolanta Valčiukienė & Janis Viesturs & Kurt Weninger, 2022. "Land Resource Management Policy in Selected European Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-32, December.
    3. Fa Tian & Shiying Hou, 2022. "The Impact of Green Finance on Industrial Land Use Efficiency: Evidence from 279 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Zhou, Di & Hu, Yanning & Xie, Dongchun & Sun, Qiong, 2023. "Land resource mismatch and energy efficiency: Evidence from 243 cities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sukyong Seo & Young Dae Kwon & Ki-Bong Yoo & Yejin Lee & Jin-Won Noh, 2019. "Is Transient and Persistent Poverty Harmful to Multimorbidity?: Model Testing Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Gyu Ri Kim & Chung Mo Nam, 2017. "Temporal trends in educational inequalities in non-communicable diseases in Korea, 2007-2015," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Siti Rohima & Saadah Yuliana & Abdul Bashir & Nazirwan Hafiz, 2017. "Public Infrastructure Availability on Development Disparity," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 375-391, December.
    4. Seungwoo Han, 2022. "Identifying the roots of inequality of opportunity in South Korea by application of algorithmic approaches," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Yang, Hee Jin & Kim, Yoon-jung, 2022. "The role of territorial collective goods in Korea’s residential development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Klaas Kresse & Erwin van der Krabben, 2021. "Housing Supply Limitations, Land Readjustment and the Ecological Performance of the Urban Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Sung-Jin Kang & Robert Rudolf, 2016. "Rising Or Falling Inequality In Korea? Population Aging And Generational Trends," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 61(05), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Marginson, Simon, 2018. "Higher education, economic inequality and social mobility: Implications for emerging East Asia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 4-11.
    9. Claude Lacour & Sylvette Puissant, 2007. "Re-Urbanity: Urbanising the Rural and Ruralising the Urban," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(3), pages 728-747, March.
    10. Ricardo Fort, 2007. "Land inequality and economic growth: a dynamic panel data approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(2‐3), pages 159-165, September.
    11. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Expansion from 2005 to 2018: The Case of Yangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    13. Ernest R. Alexander, 2015. "70 Years? Planning Theory: A Post-postmodernist Perspective," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 5-18.
    14. Sami Bibi & Mustapha K. Nabli, 2009. "Income Inequality In The Arab Region: Data And Measurement, Patterns And Trends," Middle East Development Journal (MEDJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(02), pages 275-314.
    15. Francesco Minora, 2013. "Collective institutions towards habitability: roles, strategies and forms of governance," Euricse Working Papers 1352, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    16. Moon, Byunggeor, 2018. "Housing investment, default risk, and expectations: Focusing on the chonsei market in Korea," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 80-90.
    17. Ferreira , Francisco H. G., 2010. "Distributions in motion: economic growth, inequality, and poverty dynamics," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5424, The World Bank.
    18. Gersbach, Hans & Siemers, Lars-H. R., 2010. "Land Reforms And Economic Development," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 527-547, September.
    19. Hermann Sautter, 2002. "Equity and growth – an uneasy relationship," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 089, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
    20. Harry Anthony Patrinos & Emmanuel Skoufias, 2007. "Economic Opportunities for Indigenous Peoples in Latin America : Conference Edition," World Bank Publications - Reports 8019, The World Bank Group.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:116:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.