IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v115y2022ics0264837722000473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which sustainability objectives are difficult to achieve? The mid-term evaluation of predicted scenarios in remote mountain agricultural landscapes in Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Bezáková, Magdaléna
  • Bezák, Peter

Abstract

The Poloniny National Park (Poloniny) is a forest/grassland-dominated ecosystem, peripherally located on the Slovakian border with Ukraine and Poland, with low population density, economic insufficiency and high natural and cultural values. Three different scenarios for agricultural landscape development were outlined for Poloniny in 2005 under the BioScene project and their likely contributions to achieving participatory-selected sustainability objectives were assessed. Our current research aims to evaluate the recent trends in achieving these sustainability objectives in a socio-ecological context and within the scope of the 2005 scenarios. In addition, we searched for generic and site-specific interventions that could halt the collapse of the socio-ecological system of such landscapes, paying attention to tourism which has appeared to be a promising factor in the region’s socio-economic progress in recent times. We employed information from key planning documents, statistical data on demography, changes in agricultural land use, changes seen from geo-tagged photos, and two questionnaire surveys with local stakeholders. The first survey included feedback on achieving the 2005 sustainability objectives and perceived changes in land use and management; the second aimed to find out the number of accommodated visitors in recent years. Based on sustainability appraisal, we conclude that there has been a mixed impact on biodiversity and natural resources, and a negative or stagnating trend for most social and economic aspects, especially social infrastructure for promotion of local job creation and maintaining the local population. Furthermore, changes in agricultural land use reflect farming activities optimised to local biophysical conditions and toward reaching farm efficiency under the conditions set by the Common Agricultural Policy. Nevertheless, ecotourism was found to be an opportunity in stimulating multi-functional and sustainable landscape management: ecotourism has significantly expanded in the last few years, especially due to local initiatives, and has been further accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, its long-term maintenance is uncertain since its linkage to the well-being of the local community is absent. For achieving this objective, we recommend systematic design of targeted rural policy which respects the needs and character of peripheral mountain regions, provides better conditions for sustainable farming, especially in connection with nonproduction benefits from agricultural landscape such as recreation and biodiversity, and considers local actions and knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Bezáková, Magdaléna & Bezák, Peter, 2022. "Which sustainability objectives are difficult to achieve? The mid-term evaluation of predicted scenarios in remote mountain agricultural landscapes in Slovakia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:115:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000473
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722000473
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jialing Yu & Jian Wu, 2018. "The Sustainability of Agricultural Development in China: The Agriculture–Environment Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    2. LUCIAN Paul, 2020. "Rural Development In Romania – A Few Considerations," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 15(2), pages 165-174, August.
    3. Premysl Stych & Jan Kabrda & Ivan Bicik & Josef Lastovicka, 2019. "Regional Differentiation of Long-Term Land Use Changes: A Case Study of Czechia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Monika Małgorzata Wojcieszak-Zbierska & Anna Jęczmyk & Jan Zawadka & Jarosław Uglis, 2020. "Agritourism in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19): A Rapid Assessment from Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Pazúr, Robert & Lieskovský, Juraj & Bürgi, Matthias & Müller, Daniel & Lieskovský, Tibor & Zhang, Zhen & Prischchepov, Alexander V., 2020. "Abandonment and recultivation of agricultural lands in Slovakia: Patterns and determinants from the past to the future," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(9).
    6. D’Arco, Mario & Lo Presti, Letizia & Marino, Vittoria & Maggiore, Giulio, 2021. "Is sustainable tourism a goal that came true? The Italian experience of the Cilento and Vallo di Diano National Park," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Inga C. Melchior & Jens Newig, 2021. "Governing Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture—Taking Stock of an Emerging Field of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    8. Jana Špulerová & Peter Bezák & Marta Dobrovodská & Juraj Lieskovský & Dagmar Štefunková, 2017. "Traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia: why should we preserve them?," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 891-903, November.
    9. Allen, Cameron & Metternicht, Graciela & Wiedmann, Thomas, 2016. "National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 199-207.
    10. Balázsi, Ágnes & Dänhardt, Juliana & Collins, Sue & Schweiger, Oliver & Settele, Josef & Hartel, Tibor, 2021. "Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands: Expert survey in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Bazyli Czyżewski & Marta Guth, 2021. "Impact of Policy and Factor Intensity on Sustainable Value of European Agriculture: Exploring Trade-Offs of Environmental, Economic and Social Efficiency at the Regional Level," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Schulp, Catharina J.E. & Levers, Christian & Kuemmerle, Tobias & Tieskens, Koen F. & Verburg, Peter H., 2019. "Mapping and modelling past and future land use change in Europe’s cultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 332-344.
    13. Ante Mandić, 2020. "Structuring challenges of sustainable tourism development in protected natural areas with driving force–pressure–state–impact–response (DPSIR) framework," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 560-576, December.
    14. Moss, Ellen D. & Evans, Darren M. & Atkins, Jonathan P., 2021. "Investigating the impacts of climate change on ecosystem services in UK agro-ecosystems: An application of the DPSIR framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Alan Matthews, 2017. "How Can the CAP Promote Rural Jobs?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(3), pages 18-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juraj Lieskovský & Dana Lieskovská, 2021. "Cropland Abandonment in Slovakia: Analysis and Comparison of Different Data Sources," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Dora Isabel Rodrigues Ferreira & José-Manuel Sánchez-Martín, 2022. "Agricultural Landscapes as a Basis for Promoting Agritourism in Cross-Border Iberian Regions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-35, May.
    3. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    4. Han Li & Wei Song, 2021. "Cropland Abandonment and Influencing Factors in Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Dorijan Radočaj & Ante Šiljeg & Rajko Marinović & Mladen Jurišić, 2023. "State of Major Vegetation Indices in Precision Agriculture Studies Indexed in Web of Science: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Jinming Yang & Shimei Li & Huicui Lu, 2019. "Quantitative Influence of Land-Use Changes and Urban Expansion Intensity on Landscape Pattern in Qingdao, China: Implications for Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Gabriela Popescu & Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Ioan Brad & Elena Peț & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2022. "Sustainability through Rural Tourism in Moieciu Area-Development Analysis and Future Proposals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Nabernegg, Stefan & Bednar-Friedl, Birgit & Muñoz, Pablo & Titz, Michaela & Vogel, Johanna, 2019. "National Policies for Global Emission Reductions: Effectiveness of Carbon Emission Reductions in International Supply Chains," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 146-157.
    11. Moyer, Jonathan D. & Hedden, Steve, 2020. "Are we on the right path to achieve the sustainable development goals?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Tianyue Ma & Jing Li & Shuang Bai & Fangzhe Chang & Zhai Jiang & Xingguang Yan & Jiahao Shao, 2022. "Optimization and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Natural and Cultivated Land Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Zhang, Yan & Wu, Tong & Song, Changsu & Hein, Lars & Shi, Faqi & Han, Mingchen & Ouyang, Zhiyun, 2022. "Influences of climate change and land use change on the interactions of ecosystem services in China’s Xijiang River Basin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Hongyun Han & Shu Wu, 2018. "Structural Change and Its Impact on the Energy Intensity of Agricultural Sector in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Joanna Kapusta-Duch & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska & Joanna Karcz, 2019. "Impact of Integrated and Conventional Plant Production on Selected Soil Parameters in Carrot Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    16. Narcisa Requelme & Ana Afonso, 2023. "The Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture (CFS-RAI) and SDG 2 and SDG 12 in Agricultural Policies: Case Study of Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Tomohiro Tasaki & Ryo Tajima & Yasuko Kameyama, 2021. "Measurement of the Importance of 11 Sustainable Development Criteria: How Do the Important Criteria Differ among Four Asian Countries and Shift as the Economy Develops?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Anita Breuer & Hannah Janetschek & Daniele Malerba, 2019. "Translating Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interdependencies into Policy Advice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Mohammed Basheer & Victor Nechifor & Alvaro Calzadilla & Claudia Ringler & David Hulme & Julien J. Harou, 2022. "Balancing national economic policy outcomes for sustainable development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Pahlavani, Parham & Sheikhian, Hossein & Bigdeli, Behnaz, 2020. "Evaluation of residential land use compatibilities using a density-based IOWA operator and an ANFIS-based model: A case study of Tehran, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:115:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.