IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v109y2021ics026483772100363x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the collaborative governance of urban regeneration based on a Bayesian network: The case of Chongqing

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Guiwen
  • Fu, Xinyue
  • Han, Qingye
  • Huang, Ruopeng
  • Zhuang, Taozhi

Abstract

The rapid development of the economy and urbanization has led to numerous urban regeneration projects, and collaborative governance is increasingly advocated to address the management issues that occur during urban regeneration. However, strong collaboration is still a great challenge among multiple stakeholders during the process of urban regeneration. Based on Bayesian network theory and the case of Chongqing, this article aims to deconstruct the complex structure and explore the inherent mechanism of urban regeneration governance to achieve collaboration. First, a Bayesian network model of urban regeneration governance was developed to visualize the complex structure of multiple stakeholders’ interests. Second, the inherent mechanism was analyzed though Bayesian inference. The results indicate that the cooperation degree of related governments, conflict resolution efficiency, degree of public participation, and normality of public participation may be key factors that lead to collaborative behavior. Third, a further discussion was conducted, based on which policy implications were drawn to promote collaborative governance in urban regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Guiwen & Fu, Xinyue & Han, Qingye & Huang, Ruopeng & Zhuang, Taozhi, 2021. "Research on the collaborative governance of urban regeneration based on a Bayesian network: The case of Chongqing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s026483772100363x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772100363X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luiz de Mello & João Tovar Jalles, 2020. "The global crisis and intergovernmental relations: centralization versus decentralization 10 years on," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 942-957, July.
    2. Dean, Angela J. & Lindsay, Jo & Fielding, Kelly S. & Smith, Liam D.G., 2016. "Fostering water sensitive citizenship – Community profiles of engagement in water-related issues," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P1), pages 238-247.
    3. Matteo Clemente & Luca Salvati, 2017. "‘Interrupted’ Landscapes: Post-Earthquake Reconstruction in between Urban Renewal and Social Identity of Local Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Aleksandra Maksimovska & Aleksandar Stojkov, 2019. "Composite Indicator of Social Responsiveness of Local Governments: An Empirical Mapping of the Networked Community Governance Paradigm," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 669-706, July.
    5. Matthias Bernt, 2009. "Partnerships for Demolition: The Governance of Urban Renewal in East Germany's Shrinking Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 754-769, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunxi Bai & Shanshan Wu & Yunjie Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the Key Factors Influencing Sustainable Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Jinpeng Wu & Jing Xiong, 2022. "How Governance Tools Facilitate Citizen Co-Production Behavior in Urban Community Micro-Regeneration: Evidence from Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Xuefeng Zheng & Xiufan Zhang & Decheng Fan, 2023. "Research on the Coordinated Development of Innovation Ability and Regional Integration in Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Jing Huang & Xiao Hu & Jieqiong Wang & Andong Lu, 2023. "How Diversity and Accessibility Affect Street Vitality in Historic Districts?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Zhang, Mingming & Zhou, Simei & Wang, Qunwei & Liu, Liyun & Zhou, Dequn, 2023. "Will the carbon neutrality target impact China's energy security? A dynamic Bayesian network model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Panarello, Demetrio, 2021. "Economic insecurity, conservatism, and the crisis of environmentalism: 30 years of evidence," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Loris Servillo & Antonio Paolo Russo, 2017. "Spatial Trends of Towns in Europe: The Performance of Regions with Low Degree of Urbanisation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(4), pages 403-423, September.
    4. Prener, Chris & Braswell, Taylor & Monti, Daniel J., 2018. "St. Louis's "Urban Prairie": Vacant Land and the Potential for Revitalization," SocArXiv bc7eh, Center for Open Science.
    5. Shuyi Xie & Elena Batunova, 2019. "Shrinking Historic Neighborhoods and Authenticity Dilution: An Unspoken Challenge of Historic Chinatowns in the United States through the Case of San Francisco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Tiantian Gu & Enyang Hao & Lan Ma & Xu Liu & Linxiu Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Determinants of Residents’ Behavior towards Participating in the Sponge-Style Old Community Renewal of China: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Zhenshan Yang, 2019. "Sustainability of Urban Development with Population Decline in Different Policy Scenarios: A Case Study of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. María Luisa de Lázaro Torres & Pilar Borderías Uribeondo & Francisco José Morales Yago, 2020. "Citizen and Educational Initiatives to Support Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation for All," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Martin J. Murray, 2021. "Ruination and Rejuvenation: Rethinking Growth and Decline through an Inverted Telescope," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 348-362, March.
    10. Brian W. Head, 2011. "Governance for sustainable regions: can government meet the innovation policy challenge?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 219-230, August.
    11. Annegret Haase & Dieter Rink & Katrin Grossmann & Matthias Bernt & Vlad Mykhnenko, 2014. "Conceptualizing Urban Shrinkage," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(7), pages 1519-1534, July.
    12. Peter W. Newton & Briony C. Rogers, 2020. "Transforming Built Environments: Towards Carbon Neutral and Blue-Green Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, June.
    13. João Tovar Jalles, 2021. "Promised Fiscal Expansions and Politics: A European Union Assessment," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 63(1), pages 84-116, March.
    14. Lin, Chun Liang & Chan, Edwin H.W. & Chiang, Wei-Hwa, 2022. "Urban renewal governance and manipulation of plot ratios: A comparison between Taipei, Hong Kong and, Singapore," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Jin Hui Lee & Sangyon Lim, 2018. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Sustainable Assessment of Economy-Based and Community-Based Urban Regeneration: The Case of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Spyra, Marcin & Kleemann, Janina & Calò, Nica Claudia & Schürmann, Alina & Fürst, Christine, 2021. "Protection of peri-urban open spaces at the level of regional policy-making: Examples from six European regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    17. Matthias Bernt & Laura Colini & Daniel Förste, 2017. "Privatization, Financialization and State Restructuring in Eastern Germany: The case of Am südpark," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 555-571, July.
    18. Krzysztofik Robert & Dymitrow Mirek & Grzelak-Kostulska Elżbieta & Biegańska Jadwiga, 2017. "Poverty and social exclusion: An alternative spatial explanation," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 35(35), pages 45-64, March.
    19. Elena Andrade & Gloria Seoane & Sergio Vila-Tojo & Cristina Gómez-Román & Jose-Manuel Sabucedo, 2021. "Psychological and Situational Variables Associated with Objective Knowledge on Water-Related Issues in a Northern Spanish City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Timothy J. Goodspeed, 2022. "Coping with extreme events: On solving decentralized budgetary crises," Working Papers. Collection A: Public economics, governance and decentralization 2210, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s026483772100363x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.