IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v106y2021ics0264837721001708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public real estate resource – A burden or a source of income? A study of municipal land management in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Gross, Marta
  • Wolny-Kucińska, Ada

Abstract

Real estate and land management tend to be highly complex sector and therefore challenging for local governments. An ineffective real estate management has been observed in many countries and more detailed analysis are needed especially in post-socialist countries. That is why the article raises the issue of effective management of public areas in Polish municipalities. The purposes of the study are: (i) to compare resource management methods in individual communes with the use of economic analysis, (ii) to determine whether the activities of municipalities regarding their resources are consistent with their directions of development and the priority of balancing the local budget, (iii) to identify possible disparities between real estate management in rural, urban and urban-rural municipalities and (iv) to create main guidelines for more effective and efficient resource use planning. This study has been conducted with the use of data from selected Polish municipalities identified as proper representatives of post-socialist local governments. Therefore, data relating to real estate management were selected from: (a) municipal budgets as well as from reports on their implementation (b) resource use plans that support real estate management on a local level (c) property reports. The study uses empirical methods such as: comparative analysis, qualitative analysis, case study analysis, ratio analysis and a reference to good governance principles. The study has shown that local government uses a limited number of instruments dedicated to real estate resource management and in their current form they seem to be of little use for effective management. That is why their content should be modified, also because there is potential to introduce universal indicators and efficiency measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Gross, Marta & Wolny-Kucińska, Ada, 2021. "Public real estate resource – A burden or a source of income? A study of municipal land management in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:106:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001708
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721001708
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marzia Morena & Genny Cia & Alessandra Migliore & Stefano Mantella, 2021. "Exploring Tools for Public Real Estate Enhancement in Italy: From Criteria to Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek & Stephan Maussen & Niels de Bis & Bas Verkerk, 2004. "Municipal Real Estate deployed as a capital asset," ERES eres2004_102, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    3. Bartlomiej Marona & Annette van den Beemt, 2018. "Impact of public management theory on municipal real estate management in Netherlands and Poland," ERES eres2018_317, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    4. Maria Rosaria Guarini & Fabrizio Battisti & Anthea Chiovitti, 2018. "A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.
    5. W Surazska & J Blazek, 1996. "Municipal Budgets in Poland and the Czech Republic in the Third Year of Reform," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 14(1), pages 3-23, March.
    6. Matthias Bernt, 2009. "Partnerships for Demolition: The Governance of Urban Renewal in East Germany's Shrinking Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 754-769, September.
    7. Anna Richiedei & Maurizio Tira, 2020. "Municipal Budget Management and the Generation of Urban Sprawl. A Case Study of the Lombardy Region (Italy)," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 169-184, March.
    8. Bartłomiej Marona & Annette Van den Beemt-Tjeerdsma, 2018. "Impact of Public Management Approaches on Municipal Real Estate Management in Poland and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Devaney, Laura, 2016. "Good governance? Perceptions of accountability, transparency and effectiveness in Irish food risk governance," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Carsten Lausberg & Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska, 2017. "Decision-making in the European Municipal Real Estate Management – A Case Study Approach," World of Real Estate Journal (Swiat Nieruchomosci), Fundacja Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, issue 102, pages 23-30, September.
    11. Ruth Carlitz, 2013. "Improving Transparency and Accountability in the Budget Process: An Assessment of Recent Initiatives," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31, pages 49-67, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mateusz Tomal, 2020. "Moving towards a Smarter Housing Market: The Example of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Sebastiano Carbonara & Davide Stefano, 2020. "An Operational Protocol for the Valorisation of Public Real Estate Assets in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Panarello, Demetrio, 2021. "Economic insecurity, conservatism, and the crisis of environmentalism: 30 years of evidence," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Akpan, Uduak & Morimoto, Risako, 2022. "An application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to the prioritization of rural roads to improve rural accessibility in Nigeria," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    5. Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Loris Servillo & Antonio Paolo Russo, 2017. "Spatial Trends of Towns in Europe: The Performance of Regions with Low Degree of Urbanisation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(4), pages 403-423, September.
    6. Prener, Chris & Braswell, Taylor & Monti, Daniel J., 2018. "St. Louis's "Urban Prairie": Vacant Land and the Potential for Revitalization," SocArXiv bc7eh, Center for Open Science.
    7. Shuyi Xie & Elena Batunova, 2019. "Shrinking Historic Neighborhoods and Authenticity Dilution: An Unspoken Challenge of Historic Chinatowns in the United States through the Case of San Francisco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. de Renzio, Paolo & Wehner, Joachim, 2017. "The impacts of fiscal openness," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82521, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. W Surazska & J Bucek & L Malikova & P Danek, 1997. "Towards Regional Government in Central Europe: Territorial Restructuring of Postcommunist Regimes," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 15(4), pages 437-462, December.
    10. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    11. Bamanyaki, Patricia, 2014. "Citizen-led gender-responsive budgeting in health: a theory-based approach to evaluating effectiveness," IOB Working Papers 2014.05, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    12. Gross Marta & Lin Chao, 2020. "Comparison of Real Estate Management System in China and Poland," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(1), pages 13-27, March.
    13. Zhenshan Yang, 2019. "Sustainability of Urban Development with Population Decline in Different Policy Scenarios: A Case Study of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Mahmut Baydaş & Dragan Pamučar, 2022. "Determining Objective Characteristics of MCDM Methods under Uncertainty: An Exploration Study with Financial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Klimach, Anna & Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2018. "The Polish land administration system supporting good governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 547-555.
    16. Martin J. Murray, 2021. "Ruination and Rejuvenation: Rethinking Growth and Decline through an Inverted Telescope," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 348-362, March.
    17. Brian W. Head, 2011. "Governance for sustainable regions: can government meet the innovation policy challenge?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 219-230, August.
    18. Annegret Haase & Dieter Rink & Katrin Grossmann & Matthias Bernt & Vlad Mykhnenko, 2014. "Conceptualizing Urban Shrinkage," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(7), pages 1519-1534, July.
    19. Punys, P. & Radzevičius, A. & Kvaraciejus, A. & Gasiūnas, V. & Šilinis, L., 2019. "A multi-criteria analysis for siting surface-flow constructed wetlands in tile-drained agricultural catchments: The case of Lithuania," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1036-1046.
    20. Beriro, Darren & Nathanail, Judith & Salazar, Juan & Kingdon, Andrew & Marchant, Andrew & Richardson, Steve & Gillet, Andy & Rautenberg, Svea & Hammond, Ellis & Beardmore, John & Moore, Terry & Angus,, 2022. "A decision support system to assess the feasibility of onshore renewable energy infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:106:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.