IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v103y2021ics0264837721000351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Haste makes waste: On the implications of rapid planning in Israel

Author

Listed:
  • Feitelson, Eran
  • Horowitz-Harel, Anat
  • Levin, Noam
  • Mintz, Zvi
  • Steenekamp, Guy
  • Zaban, Shaul

Abstract

Planning reforms have been advanced under the premise that streamlining planning will expedite development and growth, arguing that regulatory planning is a binding constraint on development. Yet, the veracity of this premise has not been substantiated empirically. In this study we analyze the effects of two reforms that were advanced under this premise in Israel during the last decade: a supra-commission that can bypass all others to approve large-scale housing plans and a strategic housing plan (SHP) that stipulates how many residential units should be approved each year in different parts of the country until 2040. We find that the planning of residences has indeed been expedited, and the SHP planning goals were exceeded. Yet, housing starts did not go up and thus the reforms had no appreciable effect on housing prices. Thus, we find that the premise underlying these reforms does not stand up to scrutiny. Concurrently the resulting excessive planning has adverse effects on agriculture and open spaces. Moreover, the resulting plans are likely to remain unbuilt for a long period of time, resulting in them being dated by the time they may be built. The SHP has reverted the Israeli planning system to silo planning undermining the comprehensive planning doctrine advanced since the 1990s. Thus, while the reforms do not seem to advance their purported benefits they do generate long-term negative externalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Feitelson, Eran & Horowitz-Harel, Anat & Levin, Noam & Mintz, Zvi & Steenekamp, Guy & Zaban, Shaul, 2021. "Haste makes waste: On the implications of rapid planning in Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000351
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721000351
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aliza Fleischer & Yacov Tsur, 2009. "The Amenity Value of Agricultural Landscape and Rural–Urban Land Allocation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 132-153, February.
    2. Naja Marot & Mojca Golobič, 2018. "Delivering a national spatial development strategy: a success story?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1202-1221, June.
    3. Mick Lennon & Richard Waldron, 2019. "De-democratising the Irish planning system," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 1607-1625, August.
    4. Bas Waterhout & Frank Othengrafen & Olivier Sykes, 2013. "Neo-liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 141-159, February.
    5. Pia Bäcklund & Liisa Häikiö & Helena Leino & Vesa Kanninen, 2018. "Bypassing Publicity for Getting Things Done: Between Informal and Formal Planning Practices in Finland," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 309-325, May.
    6. Aliza Fleischer & Anat Tchetchik & Ziv Bar-Nahum & Evyatar Talev, 2018. "Is agriculture important to agritourism? The agritourism attraction market in Israel," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-296.
    7. Amnon Frenkel & Daniel Orenstein, 2012. "Can Urban Growth Management Work in an Era of Political and Economic Change?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(1), pages 16-33.
    8. Oren Yiftachel, 1996. "The Internal Frontier: Territorial Control and Ethnic Relations in Israel," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 493-508.
    9. Martin Boddy & Hannah Hickman, 2018. "“Between a Rock and a Hard Place”: Planning Reform, Localism and the Role of the Planning Inspectorate in England," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 198-217, March.
    10. Alex Lord & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2014. "Is Planning "Under Attack"? Chronicling the Deregulation of Urban and Environmental Planning in England," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 345-361, February.
    11. Phil Allmendinger & Graham Haughton, 2019. "Opening up Planning? Planning Reform in an Era of ‘Open Government’," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 438-453, August.
    12. Feitelson, Eran, 2018. "Shifting sands of planning in Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 695-706.
    13. Roger Keil, 2009. "The urban politics of roll‐with‐it neoliberalization," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 230-245, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita, 2023. "Buildable land overzoning. Have new planning regulations in Poland resolved the issue?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Lorena Fiorini & Cristina Montaldi, 2022. "Micromunicipality (MM) and Inner Areas in Italy: A Challenge for National Land Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Kristian Olesen & Helen Carter, 2018. "Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish Planning Act," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 689-707, June.
    3. Feitelson, Eran, 2018. "Shifting sands of planning in Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 695-706.
    4. Jessica Ferm & Ben Clifford & Patricia Canelas & Nicola Livingstone, 2021. "Emerging problematics of deregulating the urban: The case of permitted development in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2040-2058, August.
    5. Alfasi, Nurit & Migdalovich, Eyal, 2020. "Losing faith in planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Pankaj Bajracharya & Selima Sultana, 2022. "Examining the Use of Urban Growth Boundary for Future Urban Expansion of Chattogram, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Simin Yan & Anna Growe, 2022. "Regional Planning, Land-Use Management, and Governance in German Metropolitan Regions—The Case of Rhine–Neckar Metropolitan Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Gabriel Schwake & Haim Yacobi, 2024. "Decolonisation, gentrification, and the settler-colonial city: Reappropriation and new forms of urban exclusion in Israel," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(4), pages 618-638, June.
    9. Jenny Muir, 2014. "Neoliberalising a divided society? The regeneration of Crumlin Road Gaol and Girdwood Park, North Belfast," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(1-2), pages 52-64, February.
    10. Mark Brady & Konrad Kellermann & Christoph Sahrbacher & Ladislav Jelinek, 2009. "Impacts of Decoupled Agricultural Support on Farm Structure, Biodiversity and Landscape Mosaic: Some EU Results," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 563-585, September.
    11. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    12. Marco Bontje, 2024. "Multiscalar Governance of Shrinkage in the Netherlands: Past, Present… Future?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    13. Jonathan Jackson & Meg Holden, 2013. "Sustainable Development Compromise[d] in the Planning of Metro Vancouver’s Agricultural Lands—the Jackson Farm Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Anastasija Novikova & Lucia Rocchi & Bernardas Vaznonis, 2019. "Valuing Agricultural Landscape: Lithuanian Case Study Using a Contingent Valuation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Alberto Amore & C Michael Hall & John Jenkins, 2017. "They never said ‘Come here and let's talk about it’: Exclusion and non-decision-making in the rebuild of Christchurch, New Zealand," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(7), pages 617-639, November.
    16. Andy Inch & Richard Dunning & Aidan While & Hannah Hickman & Sarah Payne, 2020. "‘The object is to change the heart and soul’: Financial incentives, planning and opposition to new housebuilding in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(4), pages 713-732, June.
    17. Jean-Paul D. Addie, 2009. "Constructing Neoliberal Urban Democracy in the American Inner-city," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(6-7), pages 536-554, September.
    18. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Alessandro Marucci & Lorena Fiorini, 2018. "Vintage Urban Planning in Italy: Land Management with the Tools of the Mid-Twentieth Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    19. Broitman, Dani & Ben-Haim, Yakov, 2022. "Forecasting residential sprawl under uncertainty: An info-gap analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    20. Petersen, Jens-Phillip & Heurkens, Erwin, 2018. "Implementing energy policies in urban development projects: The role of public planning authorities in Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 275-289.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.