IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v102y2021ics0264837720325618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A typical phenomenon of cultivated land use in China's economically developed areas: Anti-intensification in Jiangsu Province

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Xinyuan
  • Jin, Xiaobin
  • Sun, Rui
  • Han, Bo
  • Liu, Jing
  • Zhou, Yinkang

Abstract

Cultivated land utilization is related to national food security and sustainable development. The anti-intensification of cultivated land use (ACLU) is a typical phenomenon involving recessive function loss and the potential marginalization process in China's economically developed areas. This paper summarized ACLU using theoretical and empirical research paradigms and revealed the connotation and characteristics of ACLU from the three-dimensional perspective of input-utilization-output. The results confirm ACLU, which includes two connotations of recessive and dominant, is associated with the intensification process and mainly occurs in economically developed areas. As a result of the influence of labor and capital input weakening per unit area caused by the stakeholders' behaviors of cultivated land use, ACLU mainly presents extensive utilization such as agricultural land type conversion and planting system changes. Taking Jiangsu Province as a case, the ACLU trend shows a regular pattern of changing from a rapid rise in the early stage to a gradual decline in the later stage with socioeconomic development. Concurrently, ACLU has significant regional differences, and river network density is an essential factor affecting Jiangsu's provincial ACLU trend. Besides, the natural environment and socioeconomic factors have different performance characteristics in northern, central, and southern Jiangsu, and socioeconomic contributions have gradually increased from north to south. ACLU is mainly affected by human factors such as regional policy implementation and urban-rural dual structure system, leading to regional differences in ACLU's stage and performance characteristics. Overall, this study can offer ideas for exploring the sustainable intensification path of regional agricultural land utilization under the current rural revitalization background. Further, it can provide scientific reference for cultivated land use management, crop planting mode adjustment, and agricultural land consolidation direction in economic development pilot zone.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Xinyuan & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Han, Bo & Liu, Jing & Zhou, Yinkang, 2021. "A typical phenomenon of cultivated land use in China's economically developed areas: Anti-intensification in Jiangsu Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720325618
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720325618
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Jing & Jin, Xiaobin & Xu, Weiyi & Sun, Rui & Han, Bo & Yang, Xuhong & Gu, Zhengming & Xu, Cuilan & Sui, Xueyan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2019. "Influential factors and classification of cultivated land fragmentation, and implications for future land consolidation: A case study of Jiangsu Province in eastern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Zhou, Yang & Guo, Liying & Liu, Yansui, 2019. "Land consolidation boosting poverty alleviation in China: Theory and practice," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 339-348.
    3. Kyalo Willy, Daniel & Muyanga, Milu & Jayne, Thomas, 2019. "Can economic and environmental benefits associated with agricultural intensification be sustained at high population densities? A farm level empirical analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 100-110.
    4. You, Heyuan & Hu, Xiaowei & Wu, Yizhou, 2018. "Farmland use intensity changes in response to rural transition in Zhejiang province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 350-361.
    5. Karl-Heinz Erb & Simone Gingrich & Fridolin Krausmann & Helmut Haberl, 2008. "Industrialization, Fossil Fuels, and the Transformation of Land Use," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 12(5-6), pages 686-703, October.
    6. Xie, Hualin & Cheng, Lingjuan & Lu, Hua, 2018. "Farmers’ responses to the winter wheat fallow policy in the groundwater funnel area of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 195-204.
    7. Erenstein, Olaf, 2006. "Intensification or extensification? Factors affecting technology use in peri-urban lowlands along an agro-ecological gradient in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-3), pages 132-158, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ke, Xinli & Chen, Jing & Zuo, Chengchao & Wang, Xiaoqian, 2024. "The cropland intensive utilisation transition in China: An induced factor substitution perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Songze Wu & Dongyan Wang, 2023. "Storing Grain in the Land: The Gestation, Delineation Framework, and Case of the Two Zones Policy in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Zhao, Na & Chen, Kainan & Wu, Xiaoran & Zhang, Lili & Wang, Wei, 2024. "Cropland fragmentation change across China over the last two decades," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Xupeng Zhang & Danling Chen & Xinhai Lu & Yifeng Tang & Bin Jiang, 2021. "Interaction between Land Financing Strategy and the Implementation Deviation of Local Governments’ Cultivated Land Protection Policy in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Xiaofu Lin & Hui Fu, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Cultivated Land Based on the PLUS Model: A Case Study of Haikou City, 1980–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Xiuyu Huang & Ying Wang & Wanyi Liang & Zhaojun Wang & Xiao Zhou & Qinqiang Yan, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Low–Carbon Transition of Farmland Use in Coastal Areas of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Wang, Liye & Zhang, Siyu & Xiong, Qiangqiang & Liu, Yu & Liu, Yanfang & Liu, Yaolin, 2022. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of cropland expansion and its driving factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A nuanced analysis at the county scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Yan Sun & Yuanyuan Chang & Junna Liu & Xiaoping Ge & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Non-Grain Production on Cultivated Land and Its Driving Factors in Coastal China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hualin Xie & Yingqian Huang & Qianru Chen & Yanwei Zhang & Qing Wu, 2019. "Prospects for Agricultural Sustainable Intensification: A Review of Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Xie, Jinhua & Yang, Gangqiao & Wang, Ge & Song, Yan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "How do different rural-land-consolidation modes shape farmers’ ecological production behaviors?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Quanfeng Li & Zhe Dong & Guoming Du & Aizheng Yang, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Use Intensification in Village Settings: A Survey of Typical Chinese Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Ke, Xinli & Chen, Jing & Zuo, Chengchao & Wang, Xiaoqian, 2024. "The cropland intensive utilisation transition in China: An induced factor substitution perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Yan Sun & Xiaojun Song & Jing Ma & Haochen Yu & Xiaoping Ge & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Assessing the Effectiveness for Achieving Policy Objectives of Land Consolidation in China: Evidence from Project Practices in Jiangsu Province from 2001 to 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Jian Zhou & Chao Li & Xiaotong Chu & Chenying Luo, 2022. "Is Cultivated Land Increased by Land Consolidation Sustainably Used in Mountainous Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Wen, Lanjiao & Chatalova, Lioudmila & Zhang, Anlu, 2022. "Can China's unified construction land market mitigate urban land shortage? Evidence from Deqing and Nanhai, Eastern coastal China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Ligang Lyu & Zhoubing Gao & Hualou Long & Xiaorui Wang & Yeting Fan, 2021. "Farmland Use Transition in a Typical Farming Area: The Case of Sihong County in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Zhou, Jian & Cao, Xiaoshu, 2020. "What is the policy improvement of China’s land consolidation? Evidence from completed land consolidation projects in Shaanxi Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Yuanzhi Guo & Jieyong Wang, 2023. "Land Consolidation in Rural China: Historical Stages, Typical Modes, and Improvement Paths," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Xiangyu Zhao & Wenzhi Yan & Kaige Wang & Yan Xu & Huihui Zheng & Zhiting Sang, 2023. "Study of the Morphological Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Semiarid Sandy Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Xin Xu & Qianru Chen & Zhenhong Zhu, 2022. "Evolutionary Overview of Land Consolidation Based on Bibliometric Analysis in Web of Science from 2000 to 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Mingze Wu & Yueji Zhu, 2023. "Does Farmers’ Lottery Participation Affect Technical Efficiency of Banana Production in Rural China?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Ge, Dazhuan & Wang, Zhihua & Tu, Shuangshuang & Long, Hualou & Yan, Huili & Sun, Dongqi & Qiao, Weifeng, 2019. "Coupling analysis of greenhouse-led farmland transition and rural transformation development in China’s traditional farming area: A case of Qingzhou City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 113-125.
    15. Zhang, Pengyan & Yang, Dan & Qin, Mingzhou & Jing, Wenlong, 2020. "Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Lü, Da & Gao, Guangyao & Lü, Yihe & Xiao, Feiyan & Fu, Bojie, 2020. "Detailed land use transition quantification matters for smart land management in drylands: An in-depth analysis in Northwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Weiming Tong & Kevin Lo & Pingyu Zhang, 2020. "Land Consolidation in Rural China: Life Satisfaction among Resettlers and Its Determinants," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    19. Tian, Guangjin & Duan, Jinlong & Yang, Lan, 2021. "Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanisms of cropland circulation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720325618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.