IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v60y2019ic11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of the penetration of Smart Grid technologies in the Saudi Arabian electricity infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Alaqeel, T.A.
  • Suryanarayanan, S.

Abstract

The study proposes an economic framework based on detailed cost-benefit analysis of the insertion of Smart Grid technologies for electricity infrastructure modernization. The framework maps Smart Grid assets to their functions and benefits to estimate the feasibility of each Smart Grid technology and infrastructure. Net present value and discounted cash flow models, benefit/cost ratio, and minimum total cost are included in the analysis. The framework is applied to the Saudi electricity infrastructure as a case study. The framework is a comprehensive approach for economic analysis adapted from the EPRI Smart Grid model, the NETL modern grid initiative, and a study conducted by CESI and A.T. Kearney to estimate the impact of smart meters and smart equipment on the Saudi electric grid. Our findings show that advanced asset management infrastructure technologies are the most profitable technologies for the Saudi electricity infrastructure, followed by advanced distribution operations technologies, advanced transmission operations technologies, and advanced metering infrastructure technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaqeel, T.A. & Suryanarayanan, S., 2019. "A comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of the penetration of Smart Grid technologies in the Saudi Arabian electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:60:y:2019:i:c:11
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2019.100933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178717302874
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2019.100933?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hasan, Kazi Nazmul & Saha, Tapan Kumar & Chattopadhyay, Deb & Eghbal, Mehdi, 2014. "Benefit-based expansion cost allocation for large scale remote renewable power integration into the Australian grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 836-847.
    2. Konstantelos, Ioannis & Pudjianto, Danny & Strbac, Goran & De Decker, Jan & Joseph, Pieter & Flament, Aurore & Kreutzkamp, Paul & Genoese, Fabio & Rehfeldt, Leif & Wallasch, Anna-Kathrin & Gerdes, Ger, 2017. "Integrated North Sea grids: The costs, the benefits and their distribution between countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 28-41.
    3. Zheng, Yanan & Hu, Zhaoguang & Wang, Jianhui & Wen, Quan, 2014. "IRSP (integrated resource strategic planning) with interconnected smart grids in integrating renewable energy and implementing DSM (demand side management) in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 863-874.
    4. De Castro, Luciano & Dutra, Joisa, 2013. "Paying for the smart grid," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(S1), pages 74-84.
    5. Ahmad, Ali & Ramana, M.V., 2014. "Too costly to matter: Economics of nuclear power for Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 682-694.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biancardi, Alberto & D'Adamo, Idiano & D'Amore, Franco & Moretti, Raimond, 2024. "Prosumers as drivers of SDG7 in Palestine: Net-benefit analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Artur Felipe da Silva Veloso & José Valdemir Reis Júnior & Ricardo de Andrade Lira Rabelo & Jocines Dela-flora Silveira, 2021. "HyDSMaaS: A Hybrid Communication Infrastructure with LoRaWAN and LoraMesh for the Demand Side Management as a Service," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-45, October.
    3. Bo wang & Nana Deng & Wenhui Zhao & Zhaohua Wang, 2022. "Residential power demand side management optimization based on fine-grained mixed frequency data," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 603-622, September.
    4. Vinoth Kumar Ponnusamy & Padmanathan Kasinathan & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Vinoth Ramanathan & Ranjith Kumar Anandan & Umashankar Subramaniam & Aritra Ghosh & Eklas Hossain, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review on Sustainable Aspects of Big Data Analytics for the Smart Grid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-35, December.
    5. Inna Čábelková & Wadim Strielkowski & Frank-Detlef Wende & Raisa Krayneva, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Threats for Urban Energy Networks: The Inhabitants’ Point of View," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. D'Adamo, Idiano & Gastaldi, Massimo & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2022. "The impact of a subsidized tax deduction on residential solar photovoltaic-battery energy storage systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Churkin, Andrey & Bialek, Janusz & Pozo, David & Sauma, Enzo & Korgin, Nikolay, 2021. "Review of Cooperative Game Theory applications in power system expansion planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Hall, Stephen & Foxon, Timothy J., 2014. "Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 600-609.
    3. Joalland, Olivier & Pereau, Jean-Christophe & Rambonilaza, Tina, 2019. "Bargaining local compensation payments for the installation of new power transmission lines," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 75-85.
    4. Zhou, P. & Jin, R.Y. & Fan, L.W., 2016. "Reliability and economic evaluation of power system with renewables: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 537-547.
    5. Griffiths, Steven, 2017. "A review and assessment of energy policy in the Middle East and North Africa region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 249-269.
    6. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Peng & Wang, Yang & Liu, Qian & Shen, Xinyi & Zhang, Kai & Dong, Liansai, 2016. "Coal power overcapacity and investment bubble in China during 2015–2020," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 136-144.
    7. Yuan, Jiahai & Lei, Qi & Xiong, Minpeng & Guo, Jingsheng & Hu, Zheng, 2016. "The prospective of coal power in China: Will it reach a plateau in the coming decade?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 495-504.
    8. Clastres, Cédric & Khalfallah, Haikel, 2021. "Dynamic pricing efficiency with strategic retailers and consumers: An analytical analysis of short-term market interactions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Wang, Tian & Deng, Shiming, 2019. "Multi-Period energy procurement policies for smart-grid communities with deferrable demand and supplementary uncertain power supplies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 212-226.
    10. Alshammari, Yousef M. & Sarathy, S. Mani, 2017. "Achieving 80% greenhouse gas reduction target in Saudi Arabia under low and medium oil prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 502-511.
    11. Kosugi, Takanobu, 2016. "Endogenizing the probability of nuclear exit in an optimal power-generation mix model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 102-114.
    12. Muhammad Shahid Mastoi & Hafiz Mudassir Munir & Shenxian Zhuang & Mannan Hassan & Muhammad Usman & Ahmad Alahmadi & Basem Alamri, 2022. "A Comprehensive Analysis of the Power Demand–Supply Situation, Electricity Usage Patterns, and the Recent Development of Renewable Energy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, March.
    13. Wang, Hongxia & Zhang, Junfeng & Fang, Hong, 2017. "Electricity footprint of China’s industrial sectors and its socioeconomic drivers," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 98-106.
    14. Zhang, Ning & Hu, Zhaoguang & Shen, Bo & Dang, Shuping & Zhang, Jian & Zhou, Yuhui, 2016. "A source–grid–load coordinated power planning model considering the integration of wind power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 13-24.
    15. Hasan, Kazi Nazmul & Saha, Tapan Kumar & Eghbal, Mehdi, 2014. "Investigating the priority of market participants for low emission generation entry into the Australian grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 445-455.
    16. Yang, Shenbo & Tan, Zhongfu & Lin, Hongyu & Li, Peng & De, Gejirifu & Zhou, Feng’ao & Ju, Liwei, 2020. "A two-stage optimization model for Park Integrated Energy System operation and benefit allocation considering the effect of Time-Of-Use energy price," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Hsiao, Cody Yu-Ling & Chen, Hsing Hung, 2018. "The contagious effects on economic development after resuming construction policy for nuclear power plants in Coastal China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 291-302.
    18. Zheng, Yanan & Ren, Dongming & Guo, Zheyu & Hu, Zhaoguang & Wen, Quan, 2019. "Research on integrated resource strategic planning based on complex uncertainty simulation with case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 772-786.
    19. Sunila, Kanerva & Bergaentzlé, Claire & Martin, Bénédicte & Ekroos, Ari, 2019. "A supra-national TSO to enhance offshore wind power development in the Baltic Sea? A legal and regulatory analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 775-782.
    20. Tosatto, Andrea & Beseler, Xavier Martínez & Østergaard, Jacob & Pinson, Pierre & Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros, 2022. "North Sea Energy Islands: Impact on national markets and grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:60:y:2019:i:c:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.