IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v80y2019ics0966692319300572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commodity interaction in freight movement models for New South Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Hensher, David A.
  • Teye, Collins

Abstract

The continuous growth in urban population has led to intense competition for space among the various actors in the urban system. Planning and managing this competition requires a better understanding of both personal travel and goods movements. Urban planning in the past has however, focused on providing a sustainable and efficient transport system to solve personal mobility challenges with almost total neglect of the goods movement sector. However, with the growing importance of freight to both local and national economies, and also the disproportionate impacts of freight related activities on congestion, pollution, accidents and other road hazards, there is a stronger call for a better understanding of the freight system. Central to freight movement models is an understanding of where the freight commodities are produced and consumed. An important driver in the production and/or consumption of each commodity is the production and consumption of other commodities. In this paper, these important interactions between commodities are captured in a path analysis freight model which incorporates models of commodity production and consumption. We identify the key factors driving the consumption and production of each commodity. To be suitable for forecasting and policy testing, the estimated models are transformed into linked logit models to also allow for important policy measures such as accessibility and commodity generation influences such as population and employment to be estimated. The proposed model has been implemented to generate the amount of commodity of each type produced and consumed in each state of Australia with illustrations of how the production and/or consumption of one commodity triggers the production and/or consumption of other commodities. The study also demonstrates the differential impacts of changes in demographics or employment growth on the consumption and/production of different commodities. When built into an integrated transport and land use model system that accommodates both passenger and freight activity, and includes models that account for spatial dependency (which is not a requirement of the macro level commodity generation stage), this freight generation capability contribute to the way in which freight movements influence and hence impact on the performance of the entire transport network, for both passenger and freight.

Suggested Citation

  • Hensher, David A. & Teye, Collins, 2019. "Commodity interaction in freight movement models for New South Wales," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:80:y:2019:i:c:s0966692319300572
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692319300572
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, September.
    2. David Novak & Christopher Hodgdon & Feng Guo & Lisa Aultman-Hall, 2011. "Nationwide Freight Generation Models: A Spatial Regression Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 23-41, March.
    3. Garrido, Rodrigo A., 2000. "Spatial interaction between the truck flows through the Mexico-Texas border," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 23-33, January.
    4. Hensher,David A. & Rose,John M. & Greene,William H., 2015. "Applied Choice Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107465923, October.
    5. Harker, Patrick T. & Friesz, Terry L., 1986. "Prediction of intercity freight flows, I: Theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 139-153, April.
    6. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Egger, Peter & Larch, Mario, 2013. "Gravity Redux: Estimation of gravity-equation coefficients, elasticities of substitution, and general equilibrium comparative statics under asymmetric bilateral trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 110-121.
    7. José Holguín-Veras & Gopal Patil, 2008. "A Multicommodity Integrated Freight Origin–destination Synthesis Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 309-326, September.
    8. Russo, Francesco & Musolino, Giuseppe, 2012. "A unifying modelling framework to simulate the Spatial Economic Transport Interaction process at urban and national scales," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 189-197.
    9. Sean Puckett & David Hensher & John Rose & Andrew Collins, 2007. "Design and development of a stated choice experiment for interdependent agents: accounting for interactions between buyers and sellers of urban freight services," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 429-451, July.
    10. Harker, Patrick T. & Friesz, Terry L., 1986. "Prediction of intercity freight flows, II: Mathematical formulations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 155-174, April.
    11. Terry L. Friesz & Zhong-Gui Suo & Lars Westin, 1998. "Integration of Freight Network and Computable General Equilibrium Models," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Lars Lundqvist & Lars-Göran Mattsson & Tschangho John Kim (ed.), Network Infrastructure and the Urban Environment, chapter 12, pages 212-223, Springer.
    12. Nilesh Anand & Ron van Duin & Hans Quak & Lori Tavasszy, 2015. "Relevance of City Logistics Modelling Efforts: A Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 701-719, November.
    13. Le Pira, Michela & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Inturri, Giuseppe & Ignaccolo, Matteo & Pluchino, Alessandro, 2017. "Integrating discrete choice models and agent-based models for ex-ante evaluation of stakeholder policy acceptability in urban freight transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 13-25.
    14. de Jong, Gerard & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2007. "A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 950-965, November.
    15. Thijs Knaap & Jan Oosterhaven & Lóri Tavasszy, 2001. "On the development of raem: The dutch spatial general equilibrium model and it's first application to a new railway link," ERSA conference papers ersa01p171, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    17. Agostino Nuzzolo & Pierluigi Coppola & Antonio Comi, 2013. "Freight Transport Modeling: Review And Future Challenges," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 40(2).
    18. Roorda, Matthew J. & Cavalcante, Rinaldo & McCabe, Stephanie & Kwan, Helen, 2010. "A conceptual framework for agent-based modelling of logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 18-31, January.
    19. Hensher, David & Figliozzi, Miguel Andres, 2007. "Behavioural insights into the modelling of freight transportation and distribution systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 921-923, November.
    20. Tavasszy, L.A. & Thissen, M.J.P.M. & Oosterhaven, J., 2011. "Challenges in the application of spatial computable general equilibrium models for transport appraisal," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 12-18.
    21. David Hensher & Sean Puckett, 2005. "Refocusing the Modelling of Freight Distribution: Development of an Economic-Based Framework to Evaluate Supply Chain Behaviour in Response to Congestion Charging," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 573-602, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Márquez, Luis & Cantillo, Víctor & Paternina-Arboleda, Carlos D., 2024. "Temporal accessibility and freight generation of agricultural products: An empirical study in Colombia," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Sowjanya Dhulipala & Gopal R. Patil, 2023. "Regional freight generation and spatial interactions in developing regions using secondary data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 773-810, June.
    3. Hensher, David A. & Wei, Edward & Liu, Wen, 2021. "Battery electric vehicles in cities: Measurement of some impacts on traffic and government revenue recovery," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gatta, Valerio & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2014. "Urban freight transport and policy changes: Improving decision makers' awareness via an agent-specific approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 248-252.
    2. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    3. dell’Olio, Luigi & Moura, Jose Luis & Ibeas, Angel & Cordera, Ruben & Holguin-Veras, Jose, 2017. "Receivers’ willingness-to-adopt novel urban goods distribution practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 130-141.
    4. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Konstantinus, Abisai & Zuidgeest, Mark & Hess, Stephane & de Jong, Gerard, 2020. "Assessing inter-urban freight mode choice preference for short-sea shipping in the Southern African Development Community region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Sharman, Bryce W. & Roorda, Matthew J., 2013. "Multilevel modelling of commercial vehicle inter-arrival duration using GPS data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 94-107.
    7. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & de Jong, Gerard & Larranaga, Ana M. & Bettella Cybis, Helena B., 2020. "Application of MDCEV to infrastructure planning in regional freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 255-271.
    8. Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María & García-Menéndez, Leandro & Román, Concepción, 2015. "Modelling mode choice for freight transport using advanced choice experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 252-267.
    9. Ahmed, Usman & Roorda, Matthew J., 2022. "Modelling carrier type and vehicle type choice of small and medium size firms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    11. José Holguín-Veras & Ning Xu & Miguel Jaller & John Mitchell, 2016. "A Dynamic Spatial Price Equilibrium Model of Integrated Urban Production-Transportation Operations Considering Freight Delivery Tours," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 489-519, May.
    12. Bell, Michael G.H. & Liu, Xin & Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Fonzone, Achille & Hosseinloo, Solmaz Haji, 2011. "A frequency-based maritime container assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1152-1161, September.
    13. Bell, Michael G.H. & Liu, Xin & Rioult, Jeremy & Angeloudis, Panagiotis, 2013. "A cost-based maritime container assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 58-70.
    14. Shams, Kollol & Asgari, Hamidreza & Jin, Xia, 2017. "Valuation of travel time reliability in freight transportation: A review and meta-analysis of stated preference studies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 228-243.
    15. Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2020. "Predicting the effects of logistics innovations on freight systems: Directions for research," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-6.
    16. Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ritchie, Stephen G. & Jeong, Kyungsoo, 2014. "Nonlinear inverse optimization for parameter estimation of commodity-vehicle-decoupled freight assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 71-91.
    17. Edoardo Marcucci, Amanda Stathopoulos, Romeo Danielis, 2012. "Urban freight policies and tourism. The case of own-account operators in Rome�s limited traffic zone," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 66(2), pages 121-139.
    18. Zhao, Miyuan & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ritchie, Stephen G., 2015. "An inventory-based simulation model for annual-to-daily temporal freight assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 83-101.
    19. Friesz, Terry L. & Suo, Zhong-Gui & Bernstein, David H., 1998. "A dynamic disequilibrium interregional commodity flow model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 467-483, September.
    20. Bernadeta Gołębiowska & Anna Bartczak & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2020. "Energy Demand Management and Social Norms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:80:y:2019:i:c:s0966692319300572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.