IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v81y2024ics0969698924002674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visual metaphors and white space: How the visual rhetorical language in advertising influences consumer responses to paradox brands

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Xiaozhi
  • Wei, Meiting
  • Cao, Xin

Abstract

Paradoxical brands are very common in the marketplace, and increasing the appeal of paradoxical brands to consumers is not only an important challenge for marketers but also a key issue for scholars. Based on psychobiological dual system theory, the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions, and high-low context culture theory, this study examines the effects, mechanisms, and boundary conditions of visual metaphor ads with extended white space on consumers' responses to paradoxical brands. The results of the three experiments showed that visual metaphor ads with extended (vs. limited) white space increased consumers' favorable evaluations and preferences for paradoxical brands by serially increasing their aesthetic pleasure and cognitive flexibility. In addition, these indirect effects were more pronounced in high-context cultures and were not observed in low-context cultures. This study not only makes important theoretical contributions but also provides new managerial insights into how managers can effectively promote paradoxical brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Xiaozhi & Wei, Meiting & Cao, Xin, 2024. "Visual metaphors and white space: How the visual rhetorical language in advertising influences consumer responses to paradox brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924002674
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924002674
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felix Septianto & Yuri Seo & Amy Christine Errmann, 2021. "Distinct Effects of Pride and Gratitude Appeals on Sustainable Luxury Brands," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 211-224, March.
    2. Canice M. C. Kwan & Xianchi Dai & Robert S. WyerJr., 2017. "Contextual Influences on Message Persuasion: The Effect of Empty Space," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(2), pages 448-464.
    3. Xin, Benlu & Zhu, Chengfeng & Septianto, Felix, 2022. "The effects of mixed emotional appeals in leveraging paradox brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 266-275.
    4. John W. Pracejus & G. Douglas Olsen & Thomas C. O'Guinn, 2006. "How Nothing Became Something: White Space, Rhetoric, History, and Meaning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 82-90, June.
    5. Maria A Rodas & Deborah Roedder John & Carlos J Torelli & Margaret C Campbell & Stefano Puntoni, 2021. "Building Brands for the Emerging Bicultural Market: The Appeal of Paradox Brands," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 633-650.
    6. Lei Su & Echo Wen Wan & Yuwei Jiang, 2019. "Filling an Empty Self: The Impact of Social Exclusion on Consumer Preference for Visual Density," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 808-824.
    7. Ambler, Tim & Hollier, E. Ann, 2004. "The Waste in Advertising Is the Part That Works," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 375-389, December.
    8. Kostoula Margariti, 2021. "“White” Space and Organic Claims on Food Packaging: Communicating Sustainability Values and Affecting Young Adults’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    9. McQuarrie, Edward F & Mick, David Glen, 1996. "Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(4), pages 424-438, March.
    10. Olsen, G. Douglas & Pracejus, John W. & O'Guinn, Thomas C., 2012. "Print advertising: White space," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 855-860.
    11. Japutra, Arnold & Molinillo, Sebastian, 2019. "Responsible and active brand personality: On the relationships with brand experience and key relationship constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 464-471.
    12. Lamberto Zollo, 2021. "The Consumers’ Emotional Dog Learns to Persuade Its Rational Tail: Toward a Social Intuitionist Framework of Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 295-313, January.
    13. McQuarrie, Edward F & Mick, David Glen, 1999. "Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 37-54, June.
    14. Choi, Yung Kyun & Seo, Yuri & Wagner, Udo & Yoon, Sukki, 2020. "Matching luxury brand appeals with attitude functions on social media across cultures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 520-528.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Kyounghee & Lee, Do-Hee & Kim, Ji Yoon, 2019. "The effect of verbal brand personification on consumer evaluation in advertising: Internal and external personification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 472-480.
    2. Jiang, Xia & Deng, Fengyi & Yang, Defeng & Yao, Qing, 2024. "The effects of residential mobility on consumers’ preference for paradox brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Bertele, Kerrie & Feiereisen, Stephanie & Storey, Chris & van Laer, Tom, 2020. "It’s not what you say, it’s the way you say it! Effective message styles for promoting innovative new services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 38-49.
    4. Boujena, Othman & Ulrich, Isabelle & Piris, Yolande & Chicheportiche, Laëtitia, 2021. "Using food pictorial metaphor in the advertising of non-food brands: An exploratory investigation of consumer interpretation and affective response," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Joy, Annamma & Sherry Jr., John F. & Deschenes, Jonathan, 2009. "Conceptual blending in advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 39-49, January.
    6. Kostoula Margariti, 2021. "“White” Space and Organic Claims on Food Packaging: Communicating Sustainability Values and Affecting Young Adults’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Carnevale, Marina & Luna, David & Lerman, Dawn, 2017. "Brand linguistics: A theory-driven framework for the study of language in branding," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 572-591.
    8. Davison, Jane, 2014. "Visual rhetoric and the case of intellectual capital," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 20-37.
    9. Eliza K. Dehay & Jan R. Landwehr, 2019. "A MAP for effective advertising: the metaphoric advertising processing model," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 289-303, December.
    10. Xin, Benlu & Zhu, Chengfeng & Septianto, Felix, 2022. "The effects of mixed emotional appeals in leveraging paradox brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 266-275.
    11. Olsen, G. Douglas & Pracejus, John W. & O'Guinn, Thomas C., 2012. "Print advertising: White space," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 855-860.
    12. Pecot, Fabien & Celhay, Franck & Kacha, Mathieu & Lombard, Gautier, 2022. "Expressions of the past: A practice-based approach of brand longevity visual translation in advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 121-133.
    13. Gavin L. Fox & Stephen J. Lind, 2020. "A framework for viral marketing replication and mutation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 206-222, December.
    14. Pangarkar, Aniruddha & Patel, Jayesh & Kumar, Sampath K., 2023. "Drivers of eWOM engagement on social media for luxury consumers: Analysis, implications, and future research directions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Pracejus, John W. & O'Guinn, Thomas C. & Olsen, G. Douglas, 2013. "When white space is more than “burning money”: Economic signaling meets visual commercial rhetoric," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 211-218.
    16. Wu, Laurie & Shen, Han & Fan, Alei & Mattila, Anna S., 2017. "The impact of language style on consumers′ reactions to online reviews," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 590-596.
    17. Malik, Faiza & Ishaq, Muhammad Ishtiaq, 2023. "Impact of minimalist practices on consumer happiness and financial well-being," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Menglin Li & Sining Kou & Jun Pang & Wangshuai Wang, 2024. "Take me back to the past: the impact of social identity conflict on nostalgic consumption," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 289-301, June.
    19. Anders Hauge Wien & Alessandro M. Peluso & Marco Pichierri & Luigi Piper & Gianluigi Guido, 2024. "Effects of the dark triad on word of mouth in the luxury context: the moderating role of opinion divergence," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2024(3), pages 287-309, September.
    20. Mainardes, Emerson Wagner & Coutinho, Ananda Raquel Silva & Alves, Helena Maria Batista, 2023. "The influence of the ethics of E-retailers on online customer experience and customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924002674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.