IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v81y2024ics0969698924002674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visual metaphors and white space: How the visual rhetorical language in advertising influences consumer responses to paradox brands

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Xiaozhi
  • Wei, Meiting
  • Cao, Xin

Abstract

Paradoxical brands are very common in the marketplace, and increasing the appeal of paradoxical brands to consumers is not only an important challenge for marketers but also a key issue for scholars. Based on psychobiological dual system theory, the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions, and high-low context culture theory, this study examines the effects, mechanisms, and boundary conditions of visual metaphor ads with extended white space on consumers' responses to paradoxical brands. The results of the three experiments showed that visual metaphor ads with extended (vs. limited) white space increased consumers' favorable evaluations and preferences for paradoxical brands by serially increasing their aesthetic pleasure and cognitive flexibility. In addition, these indirect effects were more pronounced in high-context cultures and were not observed in low-context cultures. This study not only makes important theoretical contributions but also provides new managerial insights into how managers can effectively promote paradoxical brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Xiaozhi & Wei, Meiting & Cao, Xin, 2024. "Visual metaphors and white space: How the visual rhetorical language in advertising influences consumer responses to paradox brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924002674
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924002674
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924002674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.