IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v70y2023ics0969698922002685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

May robots be held responsible for service failure and recovery? The role of robot service provider agents’ human-likeness

Author

Listed:
  • Arikan, Esra
  • Altinigne, Nesenur
  • Kuzgun, Ebru
  • Okan, Mehmet

Abstract

This research investigates how consumers attribute service failure and recovery responsibilities and respond to them differently based on the service provider agent type (human, humanoid, and non-humanoid robot). Two experiments show that, first, consumers attribute more service failure responsibility to the firm when the agent is less human-like. Second, they attribute more recovery responsibility to the agent and less to the firm when those agents are human, rather than robots. Third, failure (recovery) attribution to the firm reduces (enhances) consumer forgiveness and satisfaction. This study identifies the impact of human-likeness and humanness on responsibility attribution processes in interaction with robotic and human agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Arikan, Esra & Altinigne, Nesenur & Kuzgun, Ebru & Okan, Mehmet, 2023. "May robots be held responsible for service failure and recovery? The role of robot service provider agents’ human-likeness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:70:y:2023:i:c:s0969698922002685
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698922002685
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Zhen & Nakata, Cheryl & Sivakumar, K. & Grewal, Dhruv, 2013. "Fix It or Leave It? Customer Recovery from Self-service Technology Failures," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 15-29.
    2. Muhammad, Lakhi & Gul-E-Rana,, 2020. "Mediating role of customer forgiveness between perceived justice and satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Seo Young Kim & Bernd H. Schmitt & Nadia M. Thalmann, 2019. "Eliza in the uncanny valley: anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Francesc Fusté-Forné & Tazim Jamal, 2021. "Co-Creating New Directions for Service Robots in Hospitality and Tourism," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Andrew Prahl & Lyn Van Swol, 2017. "Understanding algorithm aversion: When is advice from automation discounted?," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(6), pages 691-702, September.
    6. Chen, Nuoya & Mohanty, Smaraki & Jiao, Jinfeng & Fan, Xiucheng, 2021. "To err is human: Tolerate humans instead of machines in service failure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Gohary, Ali & Hamzelu, Bahman & Pourazizi, Lida & Hanzaee, Kambiz Heidarzadeh, 2016. "Understanding effects of co-creation on cognitive, affective and behavioral evaluations in service recovery: An ethnocultural analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 182-198.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liao, Jiancai & Huang, Jingya, 2024. "Think like a robot: How interactions with humanoid service robots affect consumers’ decision strategies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Park, Junsung & Yoo, Joon Woo & Cho, Youngju & Park, Heejun, 2023. "Examining the impact of service robot communication styles on customer intimacy following service failure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Zhao, Taiyang & Ran, Yaxuan & Wu, Banggang & Lynette Wang, Valerie & Zhou, Liying & Lu Wang, Cheng, 2024. "Virtual versus human: Unraveling consumer reactions to service failures through influencer types," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Honora, Andreawan & Chih, Wen-Hai & Wang, Kai-Yu, 2022. "Managing social media recovery: The important role of service recovery transparency in retaining customers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Yang, Yan & Hu, Jing, 2021. "Self-diminishing effects of awe on consumer forgiveness in service encounters," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Yu Zhang & Bingjia Shao, 2019. "The Effectiveness of Customer Participation and Affective Misforecasting in Online Post-Recovery Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Yu Zhang & Bingjia Shao, 2018. "The Effect of Customer Participation Types on Online Recovery Satisfaction: A Mental Accounting Perspective," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Asante, Daniel & Tang, Chunyong & Asante, Eric Adom & Kwamega, Michael & Opoku-Danso, Alexander, 2023. "Leveraging perceived HPWS to improve service encounter quality in high-contact service industries," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Bagherzadeh, Ramin & Rawal, Monika & Wei, Shuqin & Saavedra Torres, Jose Luis, 2020. "The journey from customer participation in service failure to co-creation in service recovery," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    7. Zhang, Yu & Yuan, Yafen & Su, Jiafu & Xiao, Yan, 2021. "The effect of employees' politeness strategy and customer membership on customers' perception of co-recovery and online post-recovery satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Na Cai & Shuhong Gao & Jinzhe Yan, 2024. "How the communication style of chatbots influences consumers’ satisfaction, trust, and engagement in the context of service failure," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. El Hedhli, Kamel & Zourrig, Haithem & Al Khateeb, Amr & Alnawas, Ibrahim, 2023. "Stereotyping human-like virtual influencers in retailing: Does warmth prevail over competence?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Yongping Bao & Ludwig Danwitz & Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler & Lars Hornuf & Hsuan Yu Lin & Bettina von Helversen, 2022. "Similarity and Consistency in Algorithm-Guided Exploration," CESifo Working Paper Series 10188, CESifo.
    11. Yoganathan, Vignesh & Osburg, Victoria-Sophie, 2024. "The mind in the machine: Estimating mind perception's effect on user satisfaction with voice-based conversational agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Aubel Martin & Pikturniene Indre & Joye Yannick, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Response to Service Robot Anthropomorphism in Banking," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 26-42, June.
    13. Cai, Ya-Jun & Lo, Chris K.Y., 2020. "Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. K.S. Madhushankha & R. Senathirajag, 2022. "Determinants for Consumer Choice of “Electronic Banking Utilization†; Evidence from Customers of Public Banks in Sri Lanka," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(1), pages 624-634, January.
    15. Willems, Kim & Smolders, Annelien & Brengman, Malaika & Luyten, Kris & Schöning, Johannes, 2017. "The path-to-purchase is paved with digital opportunities: An inventory of shopper-oriented retail technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 228-242.
    16. Markus Jung & Mischa Seiter, 2021. "Towards a better understanding on mitigating algorithm aversion in forecasting: an experimental study," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 495-516, December.
    17. Tse, Tiffany Tsz Kwan & Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Mao, Bolin, 2024. "Beware the performance of an algorithm before relying on it: Evidence from a stock price forecasting experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Kohei Kawaguchi, 2021. "When Will Workers Follow an Algorithm? A Field Experiment with a Retail Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1670-1695, March.
    19. Logg, Jennifer M. & Minson, Julia A. & Moore, Don A., 2019. "Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 90-103.
    20. Rodolfo Vázquez-Casielles & Víctor Iglesias & Concepción Varela-Neira, 2017. "Co-creation and service recovery process communication: effects on satisfaction, repurchase intentions, and word of mouth," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(2), pages 321-343, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:70:y:2023:i:c:s0969698922002685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.