IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v128y2024ics0305048324000938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customer-to-customer returns logistics: Can it mitigate the negative impact of online returns?

Author

Listed:
  • Eruguz, Ayse Sena
  • Karabağ, Oktay
  • Tetteroo, Eline
  • van Heijst, Carl
  • van den Heuvel, Wilco
  • Dekker, Rommert

Abstract

Customer returns are a major problem for online retailers due to their economic and environmental impact. This paper investigates a new concept for handling online returns: customer-to-customer (C2C) returns logistics. The idea behind the C2C concept is to deliver returned items directly to the next customer, bypassing the retailer’s warehouse. To incentivize customers to purchase C2C return items, retailers can promote return items on their webshop with a discount. We build the mathematical models behind the C2C concept to determine how much discount to offer to ensure enough customers are induced to purchase C2C return items and to maximize the retailer’s expected total profit. Our first model, the base model (BM), is a customer-based formulation of the problem and provides an easy-to-implement constant-discount-level policy. Our second model formulates the real-world problem as a Markov decision process (MDP). Since our MDP suffers from the curse of dimensionality, we resort to simulation optimization (SO) and reinforcement learning (RL) methods to obtain reasonably good solutions. We apply our methods to data collected from a Dutch fashion retailer. We also provide extensive numerical experiments to claim generality. Our results indicate that the constant-discount-level policy obtained with the BM performs well in terms of expected profit compared to SO and RL. With the C2C concept, significant benefits can be achieved in terms of both expected profit and return rate. Even in cases where the cost-effectiveness of the C2C returns program is not pronounced, the proportion of customer-to-warehouse returns to total demand becomes lower. Therefore, the system can be defined as more environmentally friendly. The C2C concept can help retailers financially address the problem of online returns and meet the growing need for reducing their environmental impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Karabağ, Oktay & Tetteroo, Eline & van Heijst, Carl & van den Heuvel, Wilco & Dekker, Rommert, 2024. "Customer-to-customer returns logistics: Can it mitigate the negative impact of online returns?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:128:y:2024:i:c:s0305048324000938
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000938
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vishal V. Agrawal & Mark Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay & Valerie M. Thomas, 2012. "Is Leasing Greener Than Selling?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 523-533, March.
    2. Maxime C. Cohen, & Georgia Perakis & Robert S. Pindyck, 2021. "A Simple Rule for Pricing with Limited Knowledge of Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1608-1621, March.
    3. Mostard, Julien & Teunter, Ruud, 2006. "The newsboy problem with resalable returns: A single period model and case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 81-96, February.
    4. Zhang, Chong & Yu, Man & Chen, Jian, 2022. "Signaling quality with return insurance: Theory and empirical evidence," Other publications TiSEM 184da313-a89e-4a81-9f23-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Li, Tingting & Xie, Jinxing & Liu, Xin, 2020. "Consumer return policies in presence of a P2P market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Chen, Zhongwei & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Offering return-freight insurance or not: Strategic analysis of an e-seller's decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Lifei Jiang & Stanko Dimitrov & Benny Mantin, 2017. "P2P Marketplaces and Retailing in the Presence of Consumers' Valuation Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(3), pages 509-524, March.
    8. Leela Nageswaran & Soo-Haeng Cho & Alan Scheller-Wolf, 2020. "Consumer Return Policies in Omnichannel Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5558-5575, December.
    9. Xue, Yu & Caliskan-Demirag, Ozgun & Chen, Youhua (Frank) & Yu, Yugang, 2018. "Supporting customers to sell used goods: Profitability and environmental implications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 220-232.
    10. Laura Wagner & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2020. "Pricing and Assortment Strategies with Product Exchanges," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 453-466, March.
    11. Zhang, Danni & Frei, Regina & Senyo, P.K. & Bayer, Steffen & Gerding, Enrico & Wills, Gary & Beck, Adrian, 2023. "Understanding fraudulent returns and mitigation strategies in multichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Vishal V. Agrawal & Ioannis Bellos, 2017. "The Potential of Servicizing as a Green Business Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1545-1562, May.
    13. Pang, Chen & Li, Gang & Jiang, Li, 2023. "Leveraging strategic consumer behavior in consumer-to-consumer resale: From economic and environmental perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Fremstad, Anders, 2017. "Does Craigslist Reduce Waste? Evidence from California and Florida," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 135-143.
    15. Jeffrey D. Shulman & Anne T. Coughlan & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Optimal Restocking Fees and Information Provision in an Integrated Demand-Supply Model of Product Returns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 577-594, December.
    16. Difrancesco, Rita Maria & Huchzermeier, Arnd & Schröder, David, 2018. "Optimizing the return window for online fashion retailers with closed-loop refurbishment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 205-221.
    17. Unnati Narang & Venkatesh Shankar, 2019. "Mobile App Introduction and Online and Offline Purchases and Product Returns," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 756-772, September.
    18. Yang, Guangyong & Ji, Guojun, 2022. "The impact of cross-selling on managing consumer returns in omnichannel operations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    19. Yang, Lu & Li, Xiangyong & Xia, Ye & Aneja, Y.P., 2023. "Returns operations in omnichannel retailing with buy-online-and-return-to-store," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Mehmet Sekip Altug & Tolga Aydinliyim & Aditya Jain, 2021. "Managing Opportunistic Consumer Returns in Retail Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5660-5678, September.
    21. Chong Zhang & Man Yu & Jian Chen, 2022. "Signaling Quality with Return Insurance: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5847-5867, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Lu & Li, Xiangyong & Xia, Ye & Aneja, Y.P., 2023. "Returns operations in omnichannel retailing with buy-online-and-return-to-store," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Yiming Li & Gang Li & Xiajun Amy Pan, 2023. "Optimal return shipping insurance policy with consumers' anticipated regret," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(10), pages 3209-3226, October.
    3. Pang, Chen & Li, Gang & Jiang, Li, 2023. "Leveraging strategic consumer behavior in consumer-to-consumer resale: From economic and environmental perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Zhong, Yuyun & Shen, Wenjing & Ceryan, Oben, 2023. "Information provision under showrooming and webrooming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Chen, Jing & Yu, Bo & Chen, Bintong & Liu, Zhuojun, 2023. "Lenient vs. stringent returns policies in the presence of fraudulent returns: The role of customers’ fairness perceptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Aditya Vedantam & Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Trade‐In or Sell in My P2P Marketplace: A Game Theoretic Analysis of Profit and Environmental Impact," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 3923-3942, November.
    7. Xiong, Hui & Liu, Jie, 2023. "Return insurance in a competitive market: Benefiting the high-quality or low-quality retailer?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Yang, Guangyong & Ji, Guojun, 2022. "The impact of cross-selling on managing consumer returns in omnichannel operations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Avinash Geda & Jingchuan Pu & Liangfei Qiu, 2023. "The puzzle of online arbitrage and increased product returns: A game‐theoretic analysis," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(8), pages 2387-2399, August.
    10. Duong, Quang Huy & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & Nguyen, Truong Van & Ieromonachou, Petros & Nguyen, Duy Tiep, 2022. "Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    11. Liu, Jiqiong & Yuan, Rui & Feng, Shuai, 2023. "Whether to offer return-freight insurance or open a physical showroom: A strategic analysis of an online retailer’s decisions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Park, YoungSoo & Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bosung, 2022. "Online retail operations with “Try-Before-You-Buy”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 987-1002.
    13. Chen, Xiaohong & Tan, Lixia & Wang, Fuqiang, 2024. "Managing consumer bracketing purchases: Optimal return policy analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    14. Zhang, Qiao & Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong, 2021. "Information strategy in a supply chain under asymmetric customer returns information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Wan, Yao & Yang, Lei & Zhang, Jiahua & Feng, Lipan, 2024. "Optimal trade-in programs for quality differentiated recycled products," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Ratchford, Brian & Soysal, Gonca & Zentner, Alejandro & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Online and offline retailing: What we know and directions for future research," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 152-177.
    17. Zhao, Lianxia & Guo, Wen & Fang, Shu-Cherng & An, Qi, 2024. "Enhancing supply chain coordination through transparency initiatives to mitigate product returns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    18. Chen, Zhongwei & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Zhu, Stuart X., 2023. "Extracting values from consumer returns: The role of return-freight insurance for competing e-sellers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 141-155.
    19. Lin, Jiaxin & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2023. "Will providing return-freight-insurances do more good than harm to dual-channel e-commerce retailers?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1225-1239.
    20. Khouja, Moutaz & Hammami, Ramzi, 2023. "Optimizing price, order quantity, and return policy in the presence of consumer opportunistic behavior for online retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 683-703.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:128:y:2024:i:c:s0305048324000938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.