IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobuve/v19y2023ics2352673422000567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge problem diagnosis and the fate of corporate entrepreneurship initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Hunt, Richard A.
  • Townsend, David M.
  • Manocha, Parul
  • Simpson, Joseph J.

Abstract

One of the great paradoxes of corporate entrepreneurship (CE) is that even with good intentions and prodigious resources initiatives supporting the renewal and revitalization of organizations through entrepreneurial action are often programmed to fail before they are even launched. The cause of this malady stems from the challenges corporate entrepreneurs face in accurately diagnosing the state of the marketplace and the needs of their respective companies. Misdiagnosis is costly, pervasive, and avoidable; yet, the entrepreneurship literature does not offer a comprehensive explanatory model concerning why and how these expensive errors arise with such frequency. To address this gap, we leverage recent advances in realm of knowledge problem scholarship to hone in on the ability and willingness of corporate entrepreneurs to accurately assess ambiguity, equivocality, uncertainty, and complexity in the context of corporate acquisitions. Findings from the study indicate that knowledge problem misdiagnosis has a profoundly negative impact on venturing outcomes. Practitioners exposed to the framework lauded its potential to constructively challenge core company assumptions to avoid expensive mistakes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunt, Richard A. & Townsend, David M. & Manocha, Parul & Simpson, Joseph J., 2023. "Knowledge problem diagnosis and the fate of corporate entrepreneurship initiatives," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:19:y:2023:i:c:s2352673422000567
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673422000567
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Richard A., 2021. "Entrepreneurial orientation and the fate of corporate acquisitions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 241-255.
    2. Jan W. Rivkin, 2000. "Imitation of Complex Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 824-844, June.
    3. Pramodita Sharma & Sankaran James J. Chrisman, 2007. "Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship," Springer Books, in: Álvaro Cuervo & Domingo Ribeiro & Salvador Roig (ed.), Entrepreneurship, pages 83-103, Springer.
    4. Hermann Frank & Hans Landström, 2016. "What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1-2), pages 51-75, January.
    5. Richard A. Hunt & David M. Townsend & Elham Asgari & Daniel A. Lerner, 2019. "Bringing It All Back Home: Corporate Venturing and Renewal Through Spin-ins," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(6), pages 1166-1193, November.
    6. Kee H. Chung & Stephen W. Pruitt, 1994. "A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 23(3), Fall.
    7. Jeffrey G. Covin & Morgan P. Miles, 1999. "Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Pursuit of Competitive Advantage," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(3), pages 47-63, April.
    8. Phebo D. Wibbens & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2020. "Introducing LIVA to measure long‐term firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 867-890, May.
    9. R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Donald F. Kuratko, 2009. "Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-46, January.
    10. Fama, Eugene F, et al, 1969. "The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Iden, Jon & Methlie, Leif B. & Christensen, Gunnar E., 2017. "The nature of strategic foresight research: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 87-97.
    12. Jiang Bian & Jason Greenberg & Jizhen Li & Yanbo Wang, 2022. "Good to Go First? Position Effects in Expert Evaluation of Early-Stage Ventures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 300-315, January.
    13. Townsend, David M. & Hunt, Richard A., 2019. "Entrepreneurial action, creativity, & judgment in the age of artificial intelligence," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hunt, Richard A. & Townsend, David M. & Lerner, Daniel A. & Brownell, Katrina M., 2024. "Pivot, persist or perish? Knowledge problems and the extraordinarily tight boundary conditions of entrepreneurs as scientists," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    2. Villalonga, Belen, 2004. "Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 205-230, June.
    3. Darren K. Hayunga & Clifford P. Stephens, 2009. "Dividend behaviour of US equity REITs," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 105-123, September.
    4. Gonçalo Rodrigues Brás & Miguel Torres Preto, 2021. "The consequences of intrapreneurship in exporting firms: a structural-model approach," CeBER Working Papers 2021-06, Centre for Business and Economics Research (CeBER), University of Coimbra.
    5. Belén Casales Morici, 2022. "Strategic corporate entrepreneurship practices in financial services firms: the role of organizational factors," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Águeda Gil-López & Unai Arzubiaga & Elena San Román & Alfredo Massis, 2022. "The Visible Hand of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises: a longitudinal study of the Spanish National Postal Operator," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1033-1071, September.
    7. White, George O. & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Krammer, Sorin M.S., 2022. "Legal distance and entrepreneurial orientation of foreign subsidiaries: Evidence from Southeast Asia," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(6).
    8. Maretno A. Harjoto & Dongshin Kim & Indrarini Laksmana & Richard C. Walton, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and stock split," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 575-600, August.
    9. Homa Pirhadi & Alireza Feyzbakhsh, 2021. "Corporate entrepreneurship, its antecedents, process, and consequences: A systematic review and suggestion for future research," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 196-222, June.
    10. Maria de Lurdes Calisto & Soumodip Sarkar, 2017. "Innovation and corporate entrepreneurship in service businesses," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(3), pages 581-600, September.
    11. Bogatyreva, Karina & Laskovaia, Anastasiia & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy, 2022. "Entrepreneurial activity, intrapreneurship, and conducive institutions: Is there a connection?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 45-56.
    12. Gatti, Corrado & Volpe, Loredana & Vagnani, Gianluca, 2015. "Interdependence among productive activities: Implications for exploration and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 711-722.
    13. Arnd Vomberg & Christian Homburg & Torsten Bornemann, 2015. "Talented people and strong brands: The contribution of human capital and brand equity to firm value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 2122-2131, December.
    14. McSweeney, Jordan J. & McSweeney, Kevin T. & Webb, Justin W. & Sandoval, Rosalyn G., 2022. "Passion drove me here: Exploring how types of entrepreneurial passion influence different entrepreneurial intentions," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    15. Matthew J. Mazzei & David J. Ketchen & Christopher L. Shook, 2017. "Understanding strategic entrepreneurship: a “theoretical toolbox” approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 631-663, June.
    16. Covin, Jeffrey G. & Rigtering, J.P. Coen & Hughes, Mathew & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2020. "Individual and team entrepreneurial orientation: Scale development and configurations for success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-12.
    17. Michael Mustafa & Fiona Gavin & Mathew Hughes, 2018. "Contextual Determinants of Employee Entrepreneurial Behavior in Support of Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(03), pages 285-326, September.
    18. Lucrezia Fattobene & Marco Caiffa, 2016. "Sitting on the Board or Sitting on the Throne? Evidence of Boards' Overconfidence from the Italian Market," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 45(2), pages 235-269, July.
    19. Kuratko, Donald F. & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Garrett, Robert P., 2009. "Corporate venturing: Insights from actual performance," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 459-467, September.
    20. Patrick Kreiser & Louis Marino & Donald Kuratko & K. Weaver, 2013. "Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 273-291, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:19:y:2023:i:c:s2352673422000567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing-insights .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.