IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v110y2009i1p23-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Anseel, Frederik
  • Lievens, Filip
  • Schollaert, Eveline

Abstract

An unanswered question in employee development is how reflection can be used for improving performance in organizations. Drawing from research and theory on dual-process models, we develop and test a reflection strategy to stimulate deeper learning after feedback. Results of two studies (NÂ =Â 640 and NÂ =Â 488) showed that reflection combined with feedback enhanced performance improvement on a web-based work simulation better than feedback alone. Reflection without feedback did not lead to performance improvement. Further analyses indicated that the proposed reflection strategy was less effective for individuals low in learning goal orientation, low in need for cognition, and low in personal importance as they engaged less in reflection. Together, these findings provide a theoretical basis for the future study of reflection in organizations and suggest a practical and cost-effective strategy for facilitating employee development after feedback in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anseel, Frederik & Lievens, Filip & Schollaert, Eveline, 2009. "Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 23-35, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:110:y:2009:i:1:p:23-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749-5978(09)00043-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pieters, R. & Verplanken, B., 1995. "Intention-Behaviour consistency : Effects of consideration set size, involvement and need for cognition," Other publications TiSEM 3c86be3d-66f5-4f17-abc0-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maxim Egorov & Armin Pircher Verdorfer & Claudia Peus, 2019. "Taming the Emotional Dog: Moral Intuition and Ethically-Oriented Leader Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 817-834, December.
    2. Christiane Hinerasky & Rene Fahr, 2014. "Learning Outcomes, Feedback, and the Performance Effects of a Training Program," Working Papers Dissertations 16, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    3. Gérard Koenig & Isabelle Vandangeon-Derumez & Marie-Claire Marty & Yves Auroy & Jean-Paul Dumond, 2016. "Compliance with basic rules: the challenge of dialogical, enabling and disciplinary management [Le respect des règles élémentaires : enjeu d'un management dialogique, habilitant et disciplinant]," Post-Print hal-01377087, HAL.
    4. Ngoc Thuy Thi Thai & Bram De Wever & Martin Valcke, 2024. "Providing Feedback during the Online Phase of a Flipped Classroom Design: Fostering Sustainable Learning Performance While Considering Study Time Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ho Huy Tuu & Nguyen Huu Khoi & Svein Ottar Olsen, 2021. "How consumer innovativeness, technological expertise, and consideration set size can explain mobile commerce use: An extended understanding using a moderation–mediation model," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1015-1038, September.
    2. Cowley, Elizabeth, 2004. "Recognition confidence, recognition accuracy and choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 641-646, June.
    3. Sheeran, Paschal & Conner, Mark, 2019. "Degree of reasoned action predicts increased intentional control and reduced habitual control over health behaviors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 68-74.
    4. Koert Van Ittersum, 2012. "The effect of decision makers’ time perspective on intention–behavior consistency," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 263-277, March.
    5. Cowley, Elizabeth, 2002. "East-West consumer confidence and accuracy in memory for product information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 915-921, November.
    6. Van Kerckhove, Anneleen & Geuens, Maggie & Vermeir, Iris, 2012. "Intention superiority perspectives on preference-decision consistency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 692-700.
    7. Pieters, R. & Zeelenberg, M., 1999. "Wasting a window of opportunity : Anticipated and experienced regret in intention-behavior consistency," Discussion Paper 1999-03, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Kikyoung Park & Gangseog Ryu, 2018. "The Effect of Regulatory Focus on Individuals’ Donation Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Pieters, R. & Zeelenberg, M., 1999. "Wasting a window of opportunity : Anticipated and experienced regret in intention-behavior consistency," Other publications TiSEM 0e79cd6f-1ae7-4f88-b92b-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Pieters, Rik & Zeelenberg, Marcel, 2005. "On bad decisions and deciding badly: When intention-behavior inconsistency is regrettable," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 18-30, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:110:y:2009:i:1:p:23-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.