IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v97y2006i8p1783-1798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local influence analysis of multivariate probit latent variable models

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Bin
  • Song, Xin-Yuan

Abstract

The multivariate probit model is very useful for analyzing correlated multivariate dichotomous data. Recently, this model has been generalized with a confirmatory factor analysis structure for accommodating more general covariance structure, and it is called the MPCFA model. The main purpose of this paper is to consider local influence analysis, which is a well-recognized important step of data analysis beyond the maximum likelihood estimation, of the MPCFA model. As the observed-data likelihood associated with the MPCFA model is intractable, the famous Cook's approach cannot be applied to achieve local influence measures. Hence, the local influence measures are developed via Zhu and Lee's [Local influence for incomplete data model, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 63 (2001) 111-126.] approach that is closely related to the EM algorithm. The diagnostic measures are derived from the conformal normal curvature of an appropriate function. The building blocks are computed via a sufficiently large random sample of the latent response strengths and latent variables that are generated by the Gibbs sampler. Some useful perturbation schemes are discussed. Results that are obtained from analyses of an artificial example and a real example are presented to illustrate the newly developed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Bin & Song, Xin-Yuan, 2006. "Local influence analysis of multivariate probit latent variable models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(8), pages 1783-1798, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:97:y:2006:i:8:p:1783-1798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-259X(05)00179-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sik-Yum Lee & S. Wang, 1996. "Sensitivity analysis of structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 93-108, March.
    2. R. Bock & Murray Aitkin, 1981. "Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 443-459, December.
    3. Hong‐Tu Zhu & Sik‐Yum Lee, 2001. "Local influence for incomplete data models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 111-126.
    4. Sik-Yum Lee & Nian-Sheng Tang, 2004. "Local influence analysis of nonlinear structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 573-592, December.
    5. Sik-Yum Lee & Liang Xu, 2003. "On local influence analysis of full information item factor models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 339-360, September.
    6. Yutaka Tanaka & Yoshimasa Odaka, 1989. "Influential observations in principal factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(3), pages 475-485, September.
    7. W.‐Y. Poon & Y. S. Poon, 1999. "Conformal normal curvature and assessment of local influence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 51-61.
    8. Wai-Yin Poon & Shu-Jia Wang & Sik-Yum Lee, 1999. "Influence analysis of structural equation models with polytomous variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 461-473, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clécio da Silva Ferreira & Gilberto A. Paula & Gustavo C. Lana, 2022. "Estimation and diagnostic for partially linear models with first-order autoregressive skew-normal errors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 445-468, March.
    2. Zeinolabedin Najafi & Karim Zare & Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi & Soheil Shokri & Amir Mosavi, 2022. "Inference and Local Influence Assessment in a Multifactor Skew-Normal Linear Mixed Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Zeller, Camila B. & Labra, Filidor V. & Lachos, Victor H. & Balakrishnan, N., 2010. "Influence analyses of skew-normal/independent linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 1266-1280, May.
    4. Vasconcellos, Klaus L.P. & Zea Fernandez, L.M., 2009. "Influence analysis with homogeneous linear restrictions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 3787-3794, September.
    5. V. Lachos & T. Angolini & C. Abanto-Valle, 2011. "On estimation and local influence analysis for measurement errors models under heavy-tailed distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 567-590, August.
    6. Clécio S. Ferreira & Gilberto A. Paula, 2017. "Estimation and diagnostic for skew-normal partially linear models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(16), pages 3033-3053, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sik-Yum Lee & Liang Xu, 2003. "On local influence analysis of full information item factor models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 339-360, September.
    2. Tanaka, Yutaka & Zhang, Fanghong & Mori, Yuichi, 2003. "Local influence in principal component analysis: relationship between the local influence and influence function approaches revisited," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 143-160, October.
    3. Lee, Sik-Yum & Lu, Bin & Song, Xin-Yuan, 2006. "Assessing local influence for nonlinear structural equation models with ignorable missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 1356-1377, March.
    4. Sik-Yum Lee & Nian-Sheng Tang, 2004. "Local influence analysis of nonlinear structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 573-592, December.
    5. Manuel Galea & Patricia Giménez, 2019. "Local influence diagnostics for the test of mean–variance efficiency and systematic risks in the capital asset pricing model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 293-312, February.
    6. Fu, Ying-Zi & Tang, Nian-Sheng & Chen, Xing, 2009. "Local influence analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with nonignorable missing outcomes from reproductive dispersion models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3671-3684, August.
    7. Alejandra Tapia & Victor Leiva & Maria del Pilar Diaz & Viviana Giampaoli, 2019. "Influence diagnostics in mixed effects logistic regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 920-942, September.
    8. R.A.B. Assumpção & M.A. Uribe-Opazo & M. Galea, 2014. "Analysis of local influence in geostatistics using Student's t -distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(11), pages 2323-2341, November.
    9. Shi, Lei & Lu, Jun & Zhao, Jianhua & Chen, Gemai, 2016. "Case deletion diagnostics for GMM estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 176-191.
    10. Tang, Niansheng & Wu, Ying & Chen, Dan, 2018. "Semiparametric Bayesian analysis of transformation linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 225-240.
    11. V. Lachos & T. Angolini & C. Abanto-Valle, 2011. "On estimation and local influence analysis for measurement errors models under heavy-tailed distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 567-590, August.
    12. Fukang Zhu & Lei Shi & Shuangzhe Liu, 2015. "Influence diagnostics in log-linear integer-valued GARCH models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 99(3), pages 311-335, July.
    13. Matos, Larissa A. & Lachos, Victor H. & Balakrishnan, N. & Labra, Filidor V., 2013. "Influence diagnostics in linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models with censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 450-464.
    14. Zhang, Yan-Qing & Tang, Nian-Sheng, 2017. "Bayesian local influence analysis of general estimating equations with nonignorable missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 184-200.
    15. Russo, Cibele M. & Paula, Gilberto A. & Aoki, Reiko, 2009. "Influence diagnostics in nonlinear mixed-effects elliptical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4143-4156, October.
    16. Xiaowen Dai & Libin Jin & Maozai Tian & Lei Shi, 2019. "Bayesian Local Influence for Spatial Autoregressive Models with Heteroscedasticity," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 1423-1446, October.
    17. Xiaowen Dai & Libin Jin & Lei Shi & Cuiping Yang & Shuangzhe Liu, 2016. "Local influence analysis in general spatial models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(3), pages 313-331, July.
    18. Fernanda De Bastiani & Audrey Mariz de Aquino Cysneiros & Miguel Uribe-Opazo & Manuel Galea, 2015. "Influence diagnostics in elliptical spatial linear models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(2), pages 322-340, June.
    19. Jun Lu & Wen Gan & Lei Shi, 2022. "Local influence analysis for GMM estimation," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(1), pages 1-23, March.
    20. Vasconcellos, Klaus L.P. & Zea Fernandez, L.M., 2009. "Influence analysis with homogeneous linear restrictions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 3787-3794, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:97:y:2006:i:8:p:1783-1798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.