IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v72y2000i1p50-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Properties of Likelihood Inference for Order Restricted Models

Author

Listed:
  • Cohen, Arthur
  • Kemperman, J. H. B.
  • Sackrowitz, Harold B.

Abstract

The most common mode of inference for order restricted models is likelihood inference. See T. Robertson, F. T. Wright, and R. L. Dykstra (1988, "Order Restricted Statistical Inference," Wiley, New York) for an excellent treatment of inference in such models. In this paper we demonstrate that maximum likelihood estimation and likelihood ratio testing are prone to behavior that is somewhat unintuitive and unappealing to our sensibilities for many order restricted models. From a practical standpoint this behavior sometimes is cause enough for us to seek alternative procedures. For restrictions to a simple order cone, likelihood inference is satisfactory. However, if, for example, the restrictions are of the tree order type, umbrella order, star-shaped order, or stochastic order, then likelihood methods seem to have some shortcomings. General results will identify when likelihood methods are potentially wanting.

Suggested Citation

  • Cohen, Arthur & Kemperman, J. H. B. & Sackrowitz, Harold B., 2000. "Properties of Likelihood Inference for Order Restricted Models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 50-77, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:72:y:2000:i:1:p:50-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-259X(99)91847-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dykstra, Robert R., 1988. "Trails South: The Wagon-Road Economy in the Dodge City-Panhandle Region. By C. Robert Haywood. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1986. xv + 312 pp. Maps, illustrations, notes, bibliography, and in," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(1), pages 157-158, April.
    2. Agresti, Alan & Coull, Brent A., 1998. "Order-restricted inference for monotone trend alternatives in contingency tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 139-155, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balakrishnan, N. & Beutner, E. & Kamps, U., 2008. "Order restricted inference for sequential k-out-of-n systems," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(7), pages 1489-1502, August.
    2. Manco Gregory V. & Cohen Arthur, 2002. "Inadmissibility Of The Studentized Likelihood Ratio Test For Testing Order-Restricted Normal Means," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1-4), pages 177-190, April.
    3. repec:jss:jstsof:33:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Praestgaard, Jens, 2012. "A note on the power superiority of the restricted likelihood ratio test," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Cohen, Arthur & Sackrowitz, H. B., 2000. "Properties of Bayes testing procedures in order restricted inference," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 205-209, August.
    6. Youhei Oono & Nobuo Shinozaki, 2006. "Estimation of error variance in ANOVA model and order restricted scale parameters," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 58(4), pages 739-756, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartolucci, F. & Scaccia, L., 2004. "Testing for positive association in contingency tables with fixed margins," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 195-210, August.
    2. Shi, Ning-Zhong & Zheng, Shu-Rong & Guo, Jianhua, 2005. "The restricted EM algorithm under inequality restrictions on the parameters," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 53-76, January.
    3. Philip Pallmann & Ludwig Hothorn & Gemechis Djira, 2014. "A Levene-type test of homogeneity of variances against ordered alternatives," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1593-1608, December.
    4. Shin, Dong Wan & Park, Chul Gyu & Park, Taesung, 2001. "Testing for one-sided group effects in repeated measures study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 233-247, August.
    5. Bartolucci F. & Forcina A. & Dardanoni V., 2001. "Positive Quadrant Dependence and Marginal Modeling in Two-Way Tables With Ordered Margins," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1497-1505, December.
    6. Manuela Cazzaro & Roberto Colombi, 2006. "Maximum Likelihood Inference for Log-linear Models Subject to Constraints of Double Monotone Dependence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 15(2), pages 177-190, August.
    7. Gao, Wei & Shi, Ning-Zhong, 2005. "Estimating cell probabilities under order-restricted odds ratios," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 77-84, April.
    8. Jiménez, Javier Rojo & Villa-Diharce, Enrique & Flores, Miguel, 2001. "Nonparametric Estimation of the Dependence Function in Bivariate Extreme Value Distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 159-191, February.
    9. Shi, Ning-Zhong & Jiang, Hua, 1998. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Isotonic Normal Means with Unknown Variances," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 183-195, February.
    10. Ma, Chunsheng, 2000. "ISO* Property of Two-Parameter Compound Poisson Distributions with Applications," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 279-294, November.
    11. Park, Chul Gyu, 2002. "Testing for Ordered Trends of Binary Responses between Contingency Tables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 229-241, May.
    12. Jamshidian, Mortaza, 2004. "On algorithms for restricted maximum likelihood estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 137-157, March.
    13. Nashimoto, Kane & Wright, F.T., 2005. "Multiple comparison procedures for detecting differences in simply ordered means," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 291-306, February.
    14. Ivy Liu & Alan Agresti, 2005. "The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent developments," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 14(1), pages 1-73, June.
    15. Linda J. Young & M. Kateri & A. Agresti, 2013. "Bayesian inference about odds ratio structure in ordinal contingency tables," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(5), pages 281-288, August.
    16. Hoferkamp, Carol & Das Peddada, Shyamal, 2002. "Parameter Estimation in Linear Models with Heteroscedastic Variances Subject to Order Restrictions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 65-87, July.
    17. Kuriki, Satoshi & Takemura, Akimichi, 2000. "Shrinkage Estimation towards a Closed Convex Set with a Smooth Boundary," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 79-111, October.
    18. Manuela Cazzaro & Roberto Colombi, 2006. "Maximum Likelihood Inference for Log-linear Models Subject to Constraints of Double Monotone Dependence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 15(2), pages 177-190, August.
    19. Karabatsos, George & Ullrich, James R., 2002. "Enumerating and testing conjoint measurement models," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 485-504, July.
    20. Mansouri, Hossein & Shaw, Carrie, 2004. "Nonparametric multiple comparison procedures for ordered parameters in balanced incomplete blocks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 593-604, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:72:y:2000:i:1:p:50-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.