IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v43y2002i3p485-504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enumerating and testing conjoint measurement models

Author

Listed:
  • Karabatsos, George
  • Ullrich, James R.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Karabatsos, George & Ullrich, James R., 2002. "Enumerating and testing conjoint measurement models," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 485-504, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:43:y:2002:i:3:p:485-504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165-4896(02)00024-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dykstra, Robert R., 1988. "Trails South: The Wagon-Road Economy in the Dodge City-Panhandle Region. By C. Robert Haywood. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1986. xv + 312 pp. Maps, illustrations, notes, bibliography, and in," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(1), pages 157-158, April.
    2. Iverson, G. & Falmagne, J. -C., 1985. "Statistical issues in measurement," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 131-153, October.
    3. Hartman Scheiblechner, 1999. "Additive conjoint isotonic probabilistic models (ADISOP)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 295-316, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Alberto Martínez-González & Urszula Kobylinska & Desiderio Gutiérrez-Taño, 2021. "Exploring Personal and Contextual Variables of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor through the Rasch Mathematical Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. José Alberto Martínez-González & Vidina Tais Díaz-Padilla & Eduardo Parra-López, 2021. "Study of the Tourism Competitiveness Model of the World Economic Forum Using Rasch’s Mathematical Model: The Case of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dagsvik, John K., 2015. "Stochastic models for risky choices: A comparison of different axiomatizations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 81-88.
    2. Shi, Ning-Zhong & Zheng, Shu-Rong & Guo, Jianhua, 2005. "The restricted EM algorithm under inequality restrictions on the parameters," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 53-76, January.
    3. Shi, Ning-Zhong & Jiang, Hua, 1998. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Isotonic Normal Means with Unknown Variances," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 183-195, February.
    4. Richard Potthoff, 2011. "Condorcet Polling," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 67-86, July.
    5. Bouyssou, Denis & Pirlot, Marc, 2004. "A note on Wakker's Cardinal Coordinate Independence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 11-22, July.
    6. Michael H. Birnbaum & Daniel Navarro-Martinez & Christoph Ungemach & Neil Stewart & Edika G. Quispe-Torreblanca, 2016. "Risky Decision making: Testing for violations of transitivity predicted by an editing mechanism," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 75-91, January.
    7. Ma, Chunsheng, 2000. "ISO* Property of Two-Parameter Compound Poisson Distributions with Applications," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 279-294, November.
    8. Michael Birnbaum & Ulrich Schmidt, 2008. "An experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 77-91, August.
    9. Park, Chul Gyu, 2002. "Testing for Ordered Trends of Binary Responses between Contingency Tables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 229-241, May.
    10. Dagsvik, John K., 2018. "Invariance axioms and functional form restrictions in structural models," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 85-95.
    11. Jamshidian, Mortaza, 2004. "On algorithms for restricted maximum likelihood estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 137-157, March.
    12. R. Luce, 2010. "Behavioral assumptions for a class of utility theories: A program of experiments," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 19-37, August.
    13. Birnbaum, Michael H. & Gutierrez, Roman J., 2007. "Testing for intransitivity of preferences predicted by a lexicographic semi-order," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 96-112, September.
    14. Nashimoto, Kane & Wright, F.T., 2005. "Multiple comparison procedures for detecting differences in simply ordered means," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 291-306, February.
    15. Birnbaum, Michael H., 2004. "Tests of rank-dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory in gambles represented by natural frequencies: Effects of format, event framing, and branch splitting," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 40-65, September.
    16. Clintin P. Davis-Stober & Nicholas Brown, 2011. "A shift in strategy or "error"? Strategy classification over multiple stochastic specifications," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(8), pages 800-813, December.
    17. Han Bleichrodt & Peter P. Wakker, 2015. "Regret Theory: A Bold Alternative to the Alternatives," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(583), pages 493-532, March.
    18. Jens Hougaard & Tue Tjur & Lars Østerdal, 2012. "On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(4), pages 409-417, August.
    19. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2015. "A consolidated approach to the axiomatization of outranking relations: a survey and new results," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 159-212, June.
    20. Birnbaum, Michael H. & LaCroix, Adam R., 2008. "Dimension integration: Testing models without trade-offs," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 122-133, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:43:y:2002:i:3:p:485-504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.