IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v112y2012icp92-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A criterion-based model comparison statistic for structural equation models with heterogeneous data

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yun-Xian
  • Kano, Yutaka
  • Pan, Jun-Hao
  • Song, Xin-Yuan

Abstract

Heterogeneous data are common in social, educational, medical and behavioral sciences. Recently, finite mixture structural equation models (SEMs) and two-level SEMs have been respectively proposed to analyze different kinds of heterogeneous data. Due to the complexity of these two kinds of SEMs, model comparison is difficult. For instance, the computational burden in evaluating the Bayes factor is heavy, and the Deviance Information Criterion may not be appropriate for mixture SEMs. In this paper, a Bayesian criterion-based method called the Lv measure, which involves a component related to the variability of the prediction and a component related to the discrepancy between the data and the prediction, is proposed. Moreover, the calibration distribution is introduced for formal comparison of competing models. Two simulation studies, and two applications based on real data sets are presented to illustrate the satisfactory performance of the Lv measure in model comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yun-Xian & Kano, Yutaka & Pan, Jun-Hao & Song, Xin-Yuan, 2012. "A criterion-based model comparison statistic for structural equation models with heterogeneous data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 92-107.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:112:y:2012:i:c:p:92-107
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2012.05.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X12001364
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmva.2012.05.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conor Dolan & Han Maas, 1998. "Fitting multivariage normal finite mixtures subject to structural equation modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 227-253, September.
    2. Hong-Tu Zhu & Sik-Yum Lee, 2001. "A Bayesian analysis of finite mixtures in the LISREL model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 133-152, March.
    3. Asim Ansari & Kamel Jedidi, 2000. "Bayesian factor analysis for multilevel binary observations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 475-496, December.
    4. Ming-Hui Chen, 2004. "Bayesian criterion based model assessment for categorical data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(1), pages 45-63, March.
    5. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    6. Richard Scheines & Herbert Hoijtink & Anne Boomsma, 1999. "Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 37-52, March.
    7. D. B. Dunson, 2000. "Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(2), pages 355-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Yunxian & Tang, Niansheng & Jiang, Xuejun, 2016. "Bayesian approaches for analyzing earthquake catastrophic risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 110-119.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Jing-Heng & Song, Xin-Yuan & Lam, Kwok-Hap & Ip, Edward Hak-Sing, 2011. "A mixture of generalized latent variable models for mixed mode and heterogeneous data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2889-2907, November.
    2. Sik-Yum Lee & Ye-Mao Xia, 2008. "A Robust Bayesian Approach for Structural Equation Models with Missing Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 343-364, September.
    3. Dingjing Shi & Xin Tong, 2017. "The Impact of Prior Information on Bayesian Latent Basis Growth Model Estimation," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    4. Lee, Sik-Yum & Song, Xin-Yuan, 2008. "On Bayesian estimation and model comparison of an integrated structural equation model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4814-4827, June.
    5. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Melina Vekini & Vassilis Moustakis, 2009. "Entrepreneurial orientation, access to financial resources, and product performance in the Greek commercial TV industry," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 897-910, April.
    6. Ali Noudoostbeni & Kiran Kaur & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, 2018. "A Comparison of Structural Equation Modeling Approaches with DeLone & McLean’s Model: A Case Study of Radio-Frequency Identification User Satisfaction in Malaysian University Libraries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    7. David Kaplan & Chansoon Lee, 2018. "Optimizing Prediction Using Bayesian Model Averaging: Examples Using Large-Scale Educational Assessments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(4), pages 423-457, August.
    8. E. Juarez‐Colunga & G. L. Silva & C. B. Dean, 2017. "Joint modeling of zero‐inflated panel count and severity outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1413-1423, December.
    9. Assaf, A. George & Tsionas, Mike & Oh, Haemoon, 2018. "The time has come: Toward Bayesian SEM estimation in tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 98-109.
    10. Lai-Fa Hung & Wen-Chung Wang, 2012. "The Generalized Multilevel Facets Model for Longitudinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(2), pages 231-255, April.
    11. Asim Ansari & Kamel Jedidi & Sharan Jagpal, 2000. "A Hierarchical Bayesian Methodology for Treating Heterogeneity in Structural Equation Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 328-347, August.
    12. Dylan Molenaar & Paul Boeck, 2018. "Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(2), pages 279-297, June.
    13. Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi & Maisarah Binti Hasbullah, 2015. "Firm Sustainability Performance Index Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Hong-Tu Zhu & Sik-Yum Lee, 2001. "A Bayesian analysis of finite mixtures in the LISREL model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 133-152, March.
    15. Xia, Ye-Mao & Tang, Nian-Sheng, 2019. "Bayesian analysis for mixture of latent variable hidden Markov models with multivariate longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 190-211.
    16. Michael J. Daniels & Arkendu S. Chatterjee & Chenguang Wang, 2012. "Bayesian Model Selection for Incomplete Data Using the Posterior Predictive Distribution," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1055-1063, December.
    17. David B. Dunson & Zhen Chen & Jean Harry, 2003. "A Bayesian Approach for Joint Modeling of Cluster Size and Subunit-Specific Outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 521-530, September.
    18. Lu, Zhenqiu (Laura) & Zhang, Zhiyong, 2014. "Robust growth mixture models with non-ignorable missingness: Models, estimation, selection, and application," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 220-240.
    19. Arnab Kumar Maity & Sanjib Basu & Santu Ghosh, 2021. "Bayesian criterion‐based variable selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 835-857, August.
    20. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh, 2007. "Latent Variable Modelling: A Survey," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(4), pages 712-745, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:112:y:2012:i:c:p:92-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.