IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v101y2010i4p765-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric tests for conditional independence in two-way contingency tables

Author

Listed:
  • Geenens, Gery
  • Simar, Léopold

Abstract

Testing for the independence between two categorical variables R and S forming a contingency table is a well-known problem: the classical chi-square and likelihood ratio tests are used. Suppose now that for each individual a set of p characteristics is also observed. Those explanatory variables, likely to be associated with R and S, can play a major role in their possible association, and it can therefore be interesting to test the independence between R and S conditionally on them. In this paper, we propose two nonparametric tests which generalise the chi-square and the likelihood ratio ideas to this case. The procedure is based on a kernel estimator of the conditional probabilities. The asymptotic law of the proposed test statistics under the conditional independence hypothesis is derived; the finite sample behaviour of the procedure is analysed through some Monte Carlo experiments and the approach is illustrated with a real data example.

Suggested Citation

  • Geenens, Gery & Simar, Léopold, 2010. "Nonparametric tests for conditional independence in two-way contingency tables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(4), pages 765-788, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:101:y:2010:i:4:p:765-788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-259X(09)00248-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodriguez-Campos, M. C. & Cao-Abad, R., 1993. "Nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals for discrete regression functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1-2), pages 207-222, July.
    2. Rodriguez-Campos, M. Celia, 1999. "On Confidence Intervals in Nonparametric Binary Regression via Edgeworth Expansions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 218-241, May.
    3. J. B. Copas, 1983. "Plotting p Against X," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 32(1), pages 25-31, March.
    4. Signorini, D.F. & Jones, M.C., 2004. "Kernel Estimators for Univariate Binary Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 119-126, January.
    5. Joel L. Horowitz & N. E. Savin, 2001. "Binary Response Models: Logits, Probits and Semiparametrics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 43-56, Fall.
    6. Romano, Joseph P. & Wolf, Michael, 2000. "A more general central limit theorem for m-dependent random variables with unbounded m," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 115-124, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geenens Gery, 2010. "Who Deserved the 2008-2009 Belgian Football Champion Title? A Semiparametric Answer," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 6(4), pages 1-31, October.
    2. Hui, Francis K.C. & Geenens, Gery, 2012. "Nonparametric bootstrap tests of conditional independence in two-way contingency tables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 130-144.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel McFadden, 2014. "The new science of pleasure: consumer choice behavior and the measurement of well-being," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 2, pages 7-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Daniel L. McFadden, 2013. "The New Science of Pleasure," NBER Working Papers 18687, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Hui, Francis K.C. & Geenens, Gery, 2012. "Nonparametric bootstrap tests of conditional independence in two-way contingency tables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 130-144.
    4. Le Breton, Michel & Lepelley, Dominique & Smaoui, Hatem, 2012. "The Probability of Casting a Decisive Vote: From IC to IAC trhough Ehrhart's Polynomials and Strong Mixing," IDEI Working Papers 722, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    5. James G. MacKinnon & Matthew D. Webb & Morten Ø. Nielsen, 2017. "Bootstrap And Asymptotic Inference With Multiway Clustering," Working Paper 1386, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    6. Pere Riera & Raúl Brey & Guillermo Gándara, 2008. "Bid design for non-parametric contingent valuation with a single bounded dichotomous choice format," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 186(3), pages 43-60, October.
    7. Ebrahimi, Nader & Molefe, Daniel, 2003. "Survival function estimation when lifetime and censoring time are dependent," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 101-132, October.
    8. Horowitz, Joel L. & Lee, Sokbae, 2005. "Nonparametric Estimation of an Additive Quantile Regression Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1238-1249, December.
    9. Geweke, J. & Joel Horowitz & Pesaran, M.H., 2006. "Econometrics: A Bird’s Eye View," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0655, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Martin L. Hazelton & Tilman M. Davies, 2022. "Pointwise comparison of two multivariate density functions," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1791-1810, December.
    11. Kodjo Adandohoin, 2021. "Tax transition in developing countries: do value added tax and excises really work?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 379-424, May.
    12. Han, Kevin & Basse, Guillaume & Bojinov, Iavor, 2024. "Population interference in panel experiments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    13. Peter Davis & Pasquale Schiraldi, 2014. "The flexible coefficient multinomial logit (FC-MNL) model of demand for differentiated products," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(1), pages 32-63, March.
    14. Kaicheng Chen & Robert S. Martin & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2023. "Another Look at the Linear Probability Model and Nonlinear Index Models," Papers 2308.15338, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    15. Zhao, Zhibiao & Wu, Wei Biao, 2007. "Asymptotic theory for curve-crossing analysis," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 117(7), pages 862-877, July.
    16. Di Marzio, Marco & Fensore, Stefania & Panzera, Agnese & Taylor, Charles C., 2019. "Local binary regression with spherical predictors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 30-36.
    17. Chowdhury, Md Iftekhar Hasan & Balli, Faruk & de Bruin, Anne, 2024. "Investment styles of islamic equity funds," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 172-187.
    18. Gery Geenens & Thomas Cuddihy, 2018. "Non‐parametric evidence of second‐leg home advantage in European football," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1009-1031, October.
    19. Agnello, Luca & Schuknecht, Ludger, 2011. "Booms and busts in housing markets: Determinants and implications," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 171-190, September.
    20. Colubi, Ana & González-Rodri­guez, Gil & Domi­nguez-Cuesta, Mari­a José & Jiménez-Sánchez, Montserrat, 2008. "Favorability functions based on kernel density estimation for logistic models: A case study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(9), pages 4533-4543, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:101:y:2010:i:4:p:765-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.