IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jiaata/v32y2018icp61-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications for IFRS principles-based and US GAAP rules-based applications: Are accountants’ decisions affected by work location and core self-evaluations?

Author

Listed:
  • Prather-Kinsey, Jenice
  • Boyar, Scott
  • Hood, Anthony C.

Abstract

Despite efforts to increase convergence and comparability in financial reporting across national borders and regulatory boundaries, inconsistencies in the interpretation of accounting standards persist. The current study examines whether accounting decision-making (consolidation of an investee) is influenced by accountants’ work location (United States (US) vs. India) and personality (core self-evaluations). We expect these relationships to differ based on whether the accounting term “control” is interpreted using the International Accounting Standards Board’s principles-based approach versus the US Financial Accounting Standards Board’s rules-based perspective. Drawing on a sample of 180 English-speaking accountants based in the US and India, results of moderation analyses suggest that accountants’ decision to consolidate is significantly influenced by work location and core self-evaluations when the term “control” is interpreted using principles-based terminology, but not when it is interpreted using rules-based terminology. Practical implications of such inconsistencies for the continued convergence and comparability of accounting standards and decisions as well as directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Prather-Kinsey, Jenice & Boyar, Scott & Hood, Anthony C., 2018. "Implications for IFRS principles-based and US GAAP rules-based applications: Are accountants’ decisions affected by work location and core self-evaluations?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 61-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jiaata:v:32:y:2018:i:c:p:61-69
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.08.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1061951818301769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.08.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ding, Yuan & Jeanjean, Thomas & Stolowy, Herve, 2005. "Reply to discussion of "Why do national GAAP differ from IAS? The role of culture"," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 359-362.
    2. Doupnik, Timothy S. & Riccio, Edson Luiz, 2006. "The influence of conservatism and secrecy on the interpretation of verbal probability expressions in the Anglo and Latin cultural areas," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 237-261.
    3. Ding, Yuan & Jeanjean, Thomas & Stolowy, Herve, 2005. "Why do national GAAP differ from IAS? The role of culture," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 325-350.
    4. Huerta, Esperanza & Petrides, Yanira & Braun, Gary P., 2016. "Interpretation of probability expressions in accounting: The effects of frame switching," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Doupnik, Timothy S. & Richter, Martin, 2003. "Interpretation of uncertainty expressions: a cross-national study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 15-35, January.
    6. Budescu, David V. & Wallsten, Thomas S., 1985. "Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 391-405, December.
    7. Heinz, Philip & Patel, Chris & Hellmann, Andreas, 2013. "Some theoretical and methodological suggestions for studies examining accountants' professional judgments and earnings management," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 299-311.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Natasha Jostan & Ria Sandra Alimbudiono, 2020. "Student Academic Studies, Lifestyle and Prospect as Future Accountant," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 14(2), pages 115-122.
    2. Jenice Prather-Kinsey & Francesco De Luca & Ho-Tan-Phat Phan, 2022. "Improving the global comparability of IFRS-based financial reporting through global enforcement: a proposed organizational dynamic," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 330-351, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heidhues, Eva & Patel, Chris, 2011. "A critique of Gray's framework on accounting values using Germany as a case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 273-287.
    2. Yasemin Zengin Karaibrahimoglu & Burcu Guneri Cangarli, 2016. "Do Auditing and Reporting Standards Affect Firms’ Ethical Behaviours? The Moderating Role of National Culture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 55-75, November.
    3. Esin Yelgen & Nilüfer Tetik, 2014. "The Development of Accounting in Turkey and Analysis of the Accounting Culture In Terms of International Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0702372, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    4. Stephen B. Salter & Tony Kang & Giorgio Gotti & Timothy S. Doupnik, 2013. "The Role of Social Values, Accounting Values and Institutions in Determining Accounting Conservatism," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 607-632, August.
    5. Katarzyna Koleœnik, 2014. "The Role Of Culture In Accounting In The Light Of Hofstede’S, Gray’S And Schwartz’S Cultural Dimensions Theories – A Literature Review," "e-Finanse", University of Information Technology and Management, Institute of Financial Research and Analysis, vol. 9(3), pages 33-41, January.
    6. Zhang, Yuqian & De Zoysa, Anura & Cortese, Corinne, 2023. "Foreign language effect in accounting uncertainty expressions: Interpretation and probabilistic estimation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    7. MARINA Alexandra Gabriela, 2019. "Ifrs For Smes: Cultural Dimensions On Accounting In Central And Eastern Europe Countries," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 72-85, December.
    8. Tyrrall, David & Woodward, David & Rakhimbekova, Almagoul, 2007. "The relevance of International Financial Reporting Standards to a developing country: Evidence from Kazakhstan," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 82-110.
    9. Bertrand, Jérémie & de Brebisson, Hélène & Burietz, Aurore, 2021. "Why choosing IFRS? Benefits of voluntary adoption by European private companies," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Vassili Joannides & Danture Wickramasinghe & Nicolas Berland, 2012. "Critiques on gray-hofstede’s model: what impact on cross-cultural accounting research?," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01661667, HAL.
    11. Monir Zaman Mir & Bikram Chatterjee & Abu Shiraz Rahaman, 2009. "Culture and corporate voluntary reporting: A comparative exploration of the chairperson's report in India and New Zealand," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(7), pages 639-667, July.
    12. Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & André, Paul & Evans, Lisa, 2012. "The transition to IFRS and the value relevance of financial statements in Greece," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 262-277.
    13. Claudia Catalina CIOCAN, 2019. "Prudence vs. Credibility. A Formal Comparative Analysis between Romanian Accounting Regulations and IFRS," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(153), pages 114-114.
    14. Macías, Marta & Muiño, Flora, 2011. "Examining dual accounting systems in Europe," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 51-78, March.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2091 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Baker, C. Richard & Biondi, Yuri & Zhang, Qiusheng, 2010. "Disharmony in international accounting standards setting: The Chinese approach to accounting for business combinations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 107-117.
    17. Tsunogaya Noriyuki & Okada Hiromasa & Patel Chris, 2011. "The Case for Economic and Accounting Dualism: Towards Reconciling the Japanese Accounting System with the Global Trend of Fair Value Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-56, October.
    18. El-Helaly, Moataz & Ntim, Collins G. & Soliman, Mark, 2020. "The Role of National Culture in International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    19. Philip Brown, 2013. "Some Observations on Research on the Benefits to Nations of Adopting IFRS," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 3, pages 1-19, December.
    20. Rodrigo de Oliveira Leite & Ricardo Lopes Cardoso, 2020. "The Theory of Cognitive-Conditional Conservatism in Accounting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-7, September.
    21. Bikki Jaggi & Alessandra Allini & Francesca Manes Rossi & Adele Caldarelli, 2016. "Impact of Accounting Traditions, Ownership and Governance Structures on Financial Reporting by Italian Firms," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-29, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jiaata:v:32:y:2018:i:c:p:61-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-international-accounting-auditing-and-taxation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.