IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v82y2022ics0047235222001076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the Cinderella effect: Measuring victim injury in child abuse cases

Author

Listed:
  • Block, Kristina
  • Kaplan, Jacob

Abstract

Past research finds that stepparents harm and kill their partner's children at higher rates than biological parents do to their own children, a phenomenon called the “Cinderella effect.” Yet one major limitation of these studies is that reporting biases may account for a large share of the effect observed if reporting rates differ based on the victim-offender relationship. As abuse cases with serious injuries are more likely to be disclosed to police than ones with no injuries or minor injuries, using cases where the victim is seriously injured allows us to minimize the impact of differential reporting. Using data from the FBI's National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) which covers over 500,000 cases of child abuse from 1991 through 2019, we find that, relative to biological parents, unmarried partners, but not stepparents, are significantly more likely to seriously injure the child, partially supporting the Cinderella effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Block, Kristina & Kaplan, Jacob, 2022. "Testing the Cinderella effect: Measuring victim injury in child abuse cases," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:82:y:2022:i:c:s0047235222001076
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235222001076
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101987?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merritt, Darcey H., 2009. "Child abuse potential: Correlates with child maltreatment rates and structural measures of neighborhoods," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 927-934, August.
    2. Hampton, R.L. & Newberger, E.H., 1985. "Child abuse incidence and reporting by hospitals: Significance of severity, class, and race," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 75(1), pages 56-60.
    3. Kim, H. & Wildeman, C. & Jonson-Reid, M. & Drake, B., 2017. "Lifetime prevalence of investigating child maltreatment among US children," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(2), pages 274-280.
    4. Fluke, John D. & Yuan, Ying-Ying T. & Hedderson, John & Curtis, Patrick A., 2003. "Disproportionate representation of race and ethnicity in child maltreatment: investigation and victimization," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5-6), pages 359-373.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cénat, Jude Mary & McIntee, Sara-Emilie & Mukunzi, Joana N. & Noorishad, Pari-Gole, 2021. "Overrepresentation of Black children in the child welfare system: A systematic review to understand and better act," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Fix, Rebecca L. & Nair, Reshmi, 2020. "Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in substantiation of child physical and sexual abuse: Influences of caregiver and child characteristics," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Stephens, Tricia & Kuerbis, Alexis & Pisciotta, Caterina & Morgenstern, Jon, 2020. "Underexamined points of vulnerability for black mothers in the child welfare system: The role of number of births, age of first use of substances and criminal justice involvement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Cesar, Gabriel T & Decker, Scott H., 2020. "“CPS Sucks, but… I think I’m better off in the system:” Family, social support, & arts-based mentorship in child protective services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Klein, Sacha & Merritt, Darcey H., 2014. "Neighborhood racial & ethnic diversity as a predictor of child welfare system involvement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 95-105.
    6. Kim, Hyunil & Kim, Yun Young & Song, Eun-Jee & Windsor, Liliane, 2024. "Policies to reduce child poverty and child maltreatment: A scoping review and preliminary estimates of indirect effects," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Virginia Araceli Feliz & Sue D. Hobbs & Rose Borunda, 2022. "Strengthen and Respect Each Thread," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, October.
    8. Perez, Deanna M., 2001. "Ethnic differences in property, violent, and sex offending for abused and nonabused adolescents," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 407-417.
    9. Slayter, Elspeth M. & Jensen, Jordan, 2019. "Parents with intellectual disabilities in the child protection system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 297-304.
    10. M. Carmen Cano-Lozano & María J. Navas-Martínez & Lourdes Contreras, 2021. "Child-to-Parent Violence during Confinement Due to COVID-19: Relationship with Other Forms of Family Violence and Psychosocial Stressors in Spanish Youth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Adjei, Paul Banahene & Minka, Eric, 2018. "Black parents ask for a second look: Parenting under ‘White’ Child Protection rules in Canada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 511-524.
    12. Slack, Kristen S. & Berger, Lawrence M. & Reilly, Aaron & Reynders, Rachel & Cai, Julie Y., 2022. "Preventing child protective services system involvement by asking families what they need: Findings from a multi-site RCT of the community response program (CRP)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Maguire-Jack, Kathryn & Font, Sarah A., 2017. "Intersections of individual and neighborhood disadvantage: Implications for child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 44-51.
    14. Fong, Kelley, 2017. "Child welfare involvement and contexts of poverty: The role of parental adversities, social networks, and social services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 5-13.
    15. Lee, Sei-Young & Villagrana, Margarita, 2015. "Differences in risk and protective factors between crossover and non-crossover youth in juvenile justice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 18-27.
    16. Rolock, Nancy, 2011. "New methodology: Measuring racial or ethnic disparities in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1531-1537, September.
    17. Feely, Megan & Seay, Kristen D. & Loomis, Alysse M., 2019. "Harsh physical punishment as a mediator between income, re-reports and out-of-home placement in a child protective services-involved population," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 70-78.
    18. Berger, Lawrence M., 2004. "Income, family structure, and child maltreatment risk," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(8), pages 725-748, August.
    19. Weaver, Nancy L. & Taylor, Meghan E. & Weaver, Terri L. & Kutz, Timothy J., 2020. "Support Over Silence for KIDS: A bystander training program to address public child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Yang, Mi-Youn & Font, Sarah A. & Ketchum, McKenzie & Kim, Youn Kyoung, 2018. "Intergenerational transmission of child abuse and neglect: Effects of maltreatment type and depressive symptoms," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 364-371.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:82:y:2022:i:c:s0047235222001076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.