IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v92y2018icp179-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A motivational–cognitive model of creativity and the role of autonomy

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Hua
  • Li, Fuli
  • Chen, Tingting

Abstract

Recent research has questioned the assumed positive relationship between intrinsic motivation and creativity. Going beyond previous studies that explored the question of “when” intrinsic motivation affects creativity, this research addresses the question of “how.” Drawing on motivated information processing theory, we propose a motivational-cognitive model of creativity, such that intrinsic motivation exerts a positive indirect effect on creativity through cognitive flexibility. Results from two field studies provide convincing empirical evidence for our central hypothesis. To further explore how the motivational–cognitive processes to creativity are stimulated, we identify job autonomy as a contextual antecedent and find that job autonomy is positively and serially related to creativity through intrinsic motivation and cognitive flexibility. Moreover, such a serial mediating effect is stronger when supervisory autonomy support is high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Hua & Li, Fuli & Chen, Tingting, 2018. "A motivational–cognitive model of creativity and the role of autonomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 179-188.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:179-188
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318303382
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Dong & Jiang, Kaifeng & Shalley, Christina E. & Keem, Sejin & Zhou, Jing, 2016. "Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 236-263.
    2. Rajagopal, 2014. "Organizations and Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 3, pages 58-86, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Shalley, Christina E. & Perry-Smith, Jill E., 2001. "Effects of Social-Psychological Factors on Creative Performance: The Role of Informational and Controlling Expected Evaluation and Modeling Experience," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Astakhova, Marina N. & Beal, Brent D. & Camp, Kerri M., 2017. "A cross-cultural examination of the curvilinear relationship between perceived demands-abilities fit and risk-taking propensity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 41-51.
    5. John Paul Macduffie, 1995. "Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 48(2), pages 197-221, January.
    6. Fiona Lee & Amy C. Edmondson & Stefan Thomke & Monica Worline, 2004. "The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 310-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xue, Jinjie & Liu, Junqi & Geng, Zizhen & Yuan, Hongping & Chao, Lei, 2023. "Why and when do paradoxical management capabilities matter to paradoxical pressure? An empirical investigation of the role of coopetition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. David Karpa & Torben Klarl & Michael Rochlitz, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence, Surveillance, and Big Data," Papers 2111.00992, arXiv.org.
    3. van Stel, André & Kaciak, Eugene & Cieślik, Jerzy, 2020. "Hiring plans by solo entrepreneurs at the time of start-up: The role of education and the desire for self-expression," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 58-66.
    4. Vafeas, Mario & Hughes, Tim, 2021. "Inertia, boredom, and complacency in business-to-business relationships: Identifying and interpreting antecedents and manifestations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 210-220.
    5. Herron, Eddward T. & Cornell, Robert M., 2021. "Creativity amidst standardization: Is creativity related to auditors’ recognition of and responses to fraud risk cues?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 314-326.
    6. David Karpa & Torben Klarl & Michael Rochlitz, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence, Surveillance, and Big Data," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2108, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    7. Ogbeibu, Samuel & Pereira, Vijay & Emelifeonwu, Jude & Gaskin, James, 2021. "Bolstering creativity willingness through digital task interdependence, disruptive and smart HRM technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 422-436.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tønnessen, Øystein & Dhir, Amandeep & Flåten, Bjørn-Tore, 2021. "Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Rigtering, J.P.C. (Coen) & Weitzel, G.U. (Utz) & Muehlfeld, K. (Katrin), 2019. "Increasing quantity without compromising quality: How managerial framing affects intrapreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 224-241.
    3. Yong, Kevyn & Mannucci, Pier Vittorio & Lander, Michel W., 2020. "Fostering creativity across countries: The moderating effect of cultural bundles on creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1-45.
    4. Rentao Miao & Yi Cao, 2019. "High-Performance Work System, Work Well-Being, and Employee Creativity: Cross-Level Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Naoko Kato-Nitta & Tadahiko Maeda, 2016. "Organizational Creativity in Japanese National Research Institutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, October.
    6. Servet Nasifoglu Elidemir & Ali Ozturen & Steven W. Bayighomog, 2020. "Innovative Behaviors, Employee Creativity, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Breidenthal, Amy P. & Liu, Dong & Bai, Yuntao & Mao, Yina, 2020. "The dark side of creativity: Coworker envy and ostracism as a response to employee creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 242-254.
    8. Montani, Francesco & Torres, Claudio & Ferreira, Maria Cristina & Mendonça, Helenides & Silva, Ana Junça & Courcy, François & Dagenais-Desmarais, Véronique, 2021. "Self-image goals, compassionate goals and innovative work behavior: The role of organizational support for innovation across countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 588-600.
    9. Lukoschek, Carmen Sabrina & Gerlach, Gisela & Stock, Ruth Maria & Xin, Katherine, 2018. "Leading to sustainable organizational unit performance: Antecedents and outcomes of executives' dual innovation leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 266-276.
    10. Lotta Hassi & Satu Rekonen, 2018. "How Individual Characteristics Promote Experimentation In Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-30, May.
    11. Liu, Dong & Jiang, Kaifeng & Shalley, Christina E. & Keem, Sejin & Zhou, Jing, 2016. "Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 236-263.
    12. Jian Tian & Yan Peng & Xing Zhou, 2020. "The Effects of Abusive Supervision and Motivational Preference on Employees’ Innovative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Wenjing Cai & Chun Yang & Bart A. G. Bossink & Jingtao Fu, 2020. "Linking Leaders’ Voluntary Workplace Green Behavior and Team Green Innovation: The Mediation Role of Team Green Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Travis J. Grosser & David Obstfeld & Emily W. Choi & Meredith Woehler & Virginie Lopez-Kidwell & Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca & Stephen P. Borgatti, 2018. "A Sociopolitical Perspective on Employee Innovativeness and Job Performance: The Role of Political Skill and Network Structure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 612-632, August.
    15. Christina E. Shalley & Lucy L. Gilson, 2017. "Creativity and the Management of Technology: Balancing Creativity and Standardization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 605-616, April.
    16. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    17. Valeriy Makarov & Albert Bakhtizin, 2014. "The Estimation Of The Regions’ Efficiency Of The Russian Federation Including The Intellectual Capital, The Characteristics Of Readiness For Innovation, Level Of Well-Being, And Quality Of Life," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 9-30.
    18. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    19. Sharon Novak & Scott Stern, 2009. "Complementarity Among Vertical Integration Decisions: Evidence from Automobile Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 311-332, February.
    20. Anil K. Gupta & Paul E. Tesluk & M. Susan Taylor, 2007. "Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 885-897, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:179-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.