IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i6p2284-2288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multilevel control chart and fuzzy set theory to monitor inpatient falls

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Chih-Ming
  • Kao, Chi-Hung
  • Sha, Wei-Shun
  • Wu, Wen-Hsiang
  • Chen, Juei-Chao

Abstract

Monitoring hospital adverse events ensures the patient's safety. This study aims to develop a multilevel control chart and to apply fuzzy set theory and warning lines concept to monitor inpatient adverse events. This study uses a u chart to monitor the adverse events relating to falls. This study also considers the severity of fall injuries to develop multilevel control charts, and applies fuzzy set theory to determine the severity of falls. The final analysis of this study is a combination of multilevel control charts, fuzzy set theory, and warning lines concept. The findings of this study show that traditional control charts do not consider the severity of fall injury, whereas multilevel control charts can make up for the deficiencies of traditional control charts through the establishment of fuzzy rules and warning lines, thus reducing the shortcomings of traditional control charts, which cause error and low sensitivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Chih-Ming & Kao, Chi-Hung & Sha, Wei-Shun & Wu, Wen-Hsiang & Chen, Juei-Chao, 2016. "Multilevel control chart and fuzzy set theory to monitor inpatient falls," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2284-2288.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:6:p:2284-2288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315006682
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kvist, Jon, 2007. "Fuzzy set ideal type analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 474-481, May.
    2. Alireza Faraz & M. Moghadam, 2007. "Fuzzy Control Chart A Better Alternative for Shewhart Average Chart," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 375-385, June.
    3. Wu, Chih-Wen, 2015. "Facebook users' intentions in risk communication and food-safety issues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2242-2247.
    4. Albert, S.M. & King, J. & Boudreau, R. & Prasad, T. & Lin, C.J. & Newman, A.B., 2014. "Primary prevention of falls: Effectiveness of a statewide program," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(5), pages 77-84.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ching-Hsin Wang & Feng-Chia Li, 2020. "Economic design under gamma shock model of the control chart for sustainable operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 169-190, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Ebbini, Lina & Oztekin, Asil & Chen, Yao, 2016. "FLAS: Fuzzy lung allocation system for US-based transplantations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1051-1065.
    2. Ott, Ursula F. & Prowse, Peter & Fells, Ray & Rogers, Helen, 2016. "The DNA of negotiations as a set theoretic concept: A theoretical and empirical analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3561-3571.
    3. Ying Zhu & Xiaowei Wen & May Chu & Gongliang Zhang & Xuefan Liu, 2021. "Consumers’ Food Safety Risk Communication on Social Media Following the Suan Tang Zi Accident: An Extended Protection Motivation Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Schneider, Martin R. & Eggert, Andreas, 2014. "Embracing complex causality with the QCA method: An invitation," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 7(1), pages 312-328.
    5. Ott, Ursula F. & Kimura, Yuko, 2016. "A set-theoretic analysis of negotiations in Japanese MNEs: Opening up the black box," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1294-1300.
    6. Ming-Hung Shu & Dinh-Chien Dang & Thanh-Lam Nguyen & Bi-Min Hsu & Ngoc-Son Phan, 2017. "Fuzzy and Control Charts: A Data-Adaptability and Human-Acceptance Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-17, April.
    7. Johannes Meuer & Henric van der Ent, 2012. "Revisiting system theories in Strategic Human Resource Management - A set-theoretic analysis of high performing firms in the UK," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0076, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    8. Mohammad Ahmad & Weihu Cheng, 2022. "A Novel Approach of Fuzzy Control Chart with Fuzzy Process Capability Indices Using Alpha Cut Triangular Fuzzy Number," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Rossella Ciccia, 2017. "A two-step approach for the analysis of hybrids in comparative social policy analysis: a nuanced typology of childcare between policies and regimes," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2761-2780, November.
    10. A. Azadeh & M. Ameli & N. Alisoltani & S. Motevali Haghighi, 2016. "A unique fuzzy multi-control approach for continuous quality improvement in a radio therapy department," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2469-2493, November.
    11. Taewook Huh, 2020. "Comparative and Relational Trajectory of Economic Growth and Greenhouse Gas Emission: Coupled or Decoupled?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Sascha Kraus & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano & Miriam Schüssler, 2018. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 15-33, March.
    13. Meng Zhang & Yang Gao & Minghe Sun & Datian Bi, 2020. "Influential Factors and the Realization Mechanism of Sustainable Information-Sharing in Virtual Communities from a Knowledge Fermenting Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    14. Bettina Trueb, 2013. "Integrating qualitative and quantitative data: index creation using fuzzy-set QCA," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3537-3558, October.
    15. Taewook Huh & Yong-Chan Choi & Jiyoung Hailiey Kim, 2018. "The Time-Series of Energy Mix and Transition: A Comparative Study of OECD Countries through the Fuzzy-Set Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Attila Bartha & Violetta Zentai, 2020. "Long-Term Care and Gender Equality: Fuzzy-Set Ideal Types of Care Regimes in Europe," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 92-102.
    17. Fotiadis, Anestis, 2018. "Modelling wedding marketing strategies: An fsQCA Analysis," MPRA Paper 88249, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Oehr, Tim-Frederik & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2012. "Accounting and the welfare state: The missing link," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 134-152.
    19. Muhammad Aslam & Ali Hussein AL-Marshadi & Nasrullah Khan, 2019. "A New X-Bar Control Chart for Using Neutrosophic Exponentially Weighted Moving Average," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Taewook Huh & Kee-Young Yoon & I Re Chung, 2019. "Drivers and Ideal Types towards Energy Transition: Anticipating the Futures Scenarios of OECD Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:6:p:2284-2288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.