IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v180y2024ics0148296324002029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partner or servant? The influence of robot role positioning on consumers’ brand evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Teng, Lefa
  • Sun, Chuluo
  • Chen, Yifei
  • Lever, Michael W.
  • Foti, Lianne

Abstract

Despite the increasing use of robots in marketing to improve consumers’ perceptions of brand image, relatively little is known about how the positioning of robots (i.e., as either partners or servants) influences consumer evaluations of brands employing service robots. In this paper, we examine the effect of robot role positioning on consumers in four studies within the context of time-honored brands. Study 1 demonstrates that brands using robots positioned as partners (vs. servants) will enhance consumers’ brand evaluations. Study 2 shows that psychological distance is a mechanism underlying the effect between robot role positioning and consumers’ brand evaluations. Studies 3 and 4 consider power distance belief (PDB) and service type to explore the premise’s boundary and find that these factors moderate the effect of robot role positioning on consumer brand evaluations. The findings offer theoretical and managerial implications for human-robot interaction in marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Teng, Lefa & Sun, Chuluo & Chen, Yifei & Lever, Michael W. & Foti, Lianne, 2024. "Partner or servant? The influence of robot role positioning on consumers’ brand evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:180:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324002029
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324002029
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:180:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324002029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.