IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v123y2021icp529-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refugee information consumption on Twitter

Author

Listed:
  • Perez-Cepeda, Maximiliano
  • Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo G.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to describe how society expresses itself in regard to people who, due to war, politics or religion, migrate from their country of origin to foreign countries. Refugees are considered minority groups. Thus, examining their behavior reveals significant data on sociocultural factors (Tsai, 2011). Under a qualitative approach and the netnography method, we used Twitter as an instrument for data collection. The model proposed by Perez-Cepeda and Arias-Bolzmann (2020), which describes cultural factors, is used to analyze the Twitter conversation flow that evidences the sociocultural factors of minority subcultures. Studies have shown that the data structure, classification, categorization, and purpose are based on the information production and consumption of the users who participate in Twitter conversations with @Refugees—the official account of the ACNUR/UNHCR Américas. The findings showed recurrent subjects and sets of ideas related to sociocultural factors, human rights, economic news, critical reflection, and religious topics. Tweets about refugees describe the sociocultural issues around this minority group. This paper focuses on refugees, the consumption of refugee information, text writing, sociocultural factors, and the environment on Twitter. This research contributes to the social sciences, especially to sociocultural interaction studies. The originality of the work is the identification of sociocultural factors related to the social sciences that emerge from minority groups' tweets through images, texts, and objects.

Suggested Citation

  • Perez-Cepeda, Maximiliano & Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo G., 2021. "Refugee information consumption on Twitter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 529-537.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:123:y:2021:i:c:p:529-537
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320306895
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenacre, Luke & Freeman, Lynne & Donald, Melissa, 2013. "Contrasting social network and tribal theories: An applied perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 948-954.
    2. Johnson, Guillaume D. & Grier, Sonya A., 2013. "Understanding the influence of cross-cultural Consumer-to-Consumer Interaction on consumer service satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 306-313.
    3. Kozinets, Robert V, 2002. "Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 20-38, June.
    4. Zhunchen Luo & Yang Yu & Miles Osborne & Ting Wang, 2015. "Structuring Tweets for improving Twitter search," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2522-2539, December.
    5. Canice M. C. Kwan & Xianchi Dai & Robert S. WyerJr., 2017. "Contextual Influences on Message Persuasion: The Effect of Empty Space," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(2), pages 448-464.
    6. Markus Giesler & Craig J. Thompson, 2016. "A Tutorial in Consumer Research: Process Theorization in Cultural Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(4), pages 497-508.
    7. Guillaume D. Johnson & Sonya A. Grier, 2013. "Understanding the influence of cross-cultural Consumer-to-Consumer Interaction on consumer service satisfaction," Post-Print hal-01655302, HAL.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11316 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Cleveland, Mark & Rojas-Méndez, José I. & Laroche, Michel & Papadopoulos, Nicolas, 2016. "Identity, culture, dispositions and behavior: A cross-national examination of globalization and culture change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1090-1102.
    10. Jamal, Ahmad & Shukor, Syadiyah Abdul, 2014. "Antecedents and outcomes of interpersonal influences and the role of acculturation: The case of young British-Muslims," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 237-245.
    11. Eric J. Arnould & Craig J. Thompson, 2005. "Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 868-882, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thanwamas Kassanuk & Khongdet Phasinam, 2023. "A Hybrid Binary Bird Swarm Optimization (BSO) and Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) for VM Allocation and Load Balancing in Cloud," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Perez-Cepeda, Maximiliano & Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo G., 2022. "Sociocultural factors during COVID-19 pandemic: Information consumption on Twitter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 384-393.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez-Cepeda, Maximiliano & Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo G., 2022. "Sociocultural factors during COVID-19 pandemic: Information consumption on Twitter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 384-393.
    2. Griffith, Denni Arli & van Esch, Patrick & Trittenbach, Makayla, 2018. "Investigating the mediating effect of Uber's sexual harassment case on its brand: Does it matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 111-118.
    3. Jack Coffin & Andreas Chatzidakis, 2021. "The Möbius strip of market spatiality: mobilizing transdisciplinary dialogues between CCT and the marketing mainstream," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 40-59, June.
    4. Karin Brondino-Pompeo, 2021. "Mapping spheres of exchange: a multidimensional approach to commoditization and singularization," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 81-95, June.
    5. G. Tomas M. Hult & Forrest V. Morgeson III & Udit Sharma & Claes Fornell, 2022. "Customer satisfaction and international business: A multidisciplinary review and avenues for research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(8), pages 1695-1733, October.
    6. repec:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2023:i:5:p:904-925. is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Dorsey, Joshua D. & Ashley, Christy & Oliver, Jason D., 2016. "Triggers and outcomes of customer-to-customer aisle rage," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 67-77.
    8. Kharouf, Husni & Biscaia, Rui & Garcia-Perez, Alexeis & Hickman, Ellie, 2020. "Understanding online event experience: The importance of communication, engagement and interaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 735-746.
    9. Ariana Furtado & Ricardo F. Ramos & Bruno Maia & Joana Martinho Costa, 2022. "Predictors of Hotel Clients’ Satisfaction in the Cape Verde Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    10. O'Shaughnessy, Nicholas, 2008. "Romancing Alpacas: A commentary," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 509-511, May.
    11. Podoshen, Jeffrey S. & Venkatesh, Vivek & Wallin, Jason & Andrzejewski, Susan A. & Jin, Zheng, 2015. "Dystopian dark tourism: An exploratory examination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 316-328.
    12. Bodkin, Charles D. & Amato, Christie & Peters, Cara, 2009. "The role of conflict, culture, and myth in creating attitudinal commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 1013-1019, October.
    13. Skandalis, Alexandros & Byrom, John & Banister, Emma, 2019. "Experiential marketing and the changing nature of extraordinary experiences in post-postmodern consumer culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 43-50.
    14. Cavusgil, Erin & Yayla, Serdar & Cem Kutlubay, Omer & Yeniyurt, Sengun, 2022. "The impact of demographic similarity on customers in a service setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 145-160.
    15. Pires, Guilherme D. & Dean, Alison & Rehman, Muqqadas, 2015. "Using service logic to redefine exchange in terms of customer and supplier participation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 925-932.
    16. Bernd Schmitt & J Joško Brakus & Alessandro Biraglia, 2022. "Consumption Ideology [Ideology and Terror: A Novel Form of Government]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(1), pages 74-95.
    17. Sarah C. Grace, 2021. "The intermingling of meanings in marketing: semiology and phenomenology in consumer culture theory," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 70-80, June.
    18. Das, Manish & Saha, Victor & Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Kalai, Anjana & Debnath, Nirmalya, 2022. "Cultural consequences of brands' masstige: An emerging market perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 338-353.
    19. Katja H Brunk & Markus Giesler & Benjamin J Hartmann & Darren DahlEditor & Craig ThompsonAssociate Editor, 2018. "Creating a Consumable Past: How Memory Making Shapes Marketization," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(6), pages 1325-1342.
    20. Pedeliento, Giuseppe & Bettinelli, Cristina & Andreini, Daniela & Bergamaschi, Mara, 2018. "Consumer entrepreneurship and cultural innovation: The case of GinO12," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 431-442.
    21. Ying Zhou & Sameer Kumar & Fumitaka Furuoka, 2024. "Enhancing customer value co-creation and stickiness in social commerce: integrating PLS-SEM and NCA for deeper insights into customer-to-customer dynamics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:123:y:2021:i:c:p:529-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.