IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbfina/v152y2023ics0378426623001000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homophilous intensity in the online lending market: Bidding behavior and economic effects

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jianwen
  • Zhang, Bo
  • Jiang, Mingming
  • Hu, Jinyan

Abstract

Using transaction-level data from a large online lending marketplace, we explore the role of homophilous intensity in online lending and uncover the evidence of a significant impact of homophily on the bidding behavior and economic effects of both lenders and borrowers. Lenders are more likely to invest in borrowers with more homophilous traits, and homophily induces higher bidding amounts. Moreover, lenders charge lower prices to more homophilous borrowers, but are able to earn higher returns due to better repayment from these borrowers. Our findings suggest that homophilous intensity has a statistically and economically significant effect on both borrowers and lenders in the online lending environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jianwen & Zhang, Bo & Jiang, Mingming & Hu, Jinyan, 2023. "Homophilous intensity in the online lending market: Bidding behavior and economic effects," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:152:y:2023:i:c:s0378426623001000
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426623001000
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Girard, Yann & Hett, Florian & Schunk, Daniel, 2015. "How individual characteristics shape the structure of social networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 197-216.
    2. Xun Li & Xue Jiang & Yang Yang, 2023. "Learning by P2P bidding," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 96-119, January.
    3. Gompers, Paul A. & Mukharlyamov, Vladimir & Xuan, Yuhai, 2016. "The cost of friendship," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 626-644.
    4. He, Qing & Li, Xiaoyang, 2021. "The failure of Chinese peer-to-peer lending platforms: Finance and politics," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Hwang, Byoung-Hyoun & Kim, Seoyoung, 2009. "It pays to have friends," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 138-158, July.
    6. Raymond Fisman & Daniel Paravisini & Vikrant Vig, 2017. "Cultural Proximity and Loan Outcomes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(2), pages 457-492, February.
    7. Chen, Xiao & Huang, Bihong & Ye, Dezhu, 2018. "The role of punctuation in P2P lending: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 634-643.
    8. Oscar Stolper & Andreas Walter, 2019. "Birds of a Feather: The Impact of Homophily on the Propensity to Follow Financial Advice," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(2), pages 524-563.
    9. Deepak Hegde & Justin Tumlinson, 2014. "Does Social Proximity Enhance Business Partnerships? Theory and Evidence from Ethnicity's Role in U.S. Venture Capital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2355-2380, September.
    10. Tan, Youchao & Xiao, Jason & (Colin) Zeng, Cheng & Zou, Hong, 2021. "What's in a name? The valuation effect of directors’ sharing of surnames," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Zaiyan Wei & Mingfeng Lin, 2017. "Market Mechanisms in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4236-4257, December.
    12. Freedman, Seth & Jin, Ginger Zhe, 2017. "The information value of online social networks: Lessons from peer-to-peer lending," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 185-222.
    13. Francesco D’Acunto & Nagpurnanand Prabhala & Alberto G Rossi, 2019. "The Promises and Pitfalls of Robo-Advising," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1983-2020.
    14. Feng Li & Venky Nagar, 2013. "Diversity and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 529-544, September.
    15. Junhui Xu & Jitka Hilliard & James R. Barth, 2020. "On Education Level and Terms in Obtaining P2P Funding: New Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 801-826, December.
    16. Yang Jiang & Yi-Chun (Chad) Ho & Xiangbin Yan & Yong Tan, 2020. "When Online Lending Meets Real Estate: Examining Investment Decisions in Lending-Based Real Estate Crowdfunding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 715-730, September.
    17. Li Liao & Zhengwei Wang & Jia Xiang & Hongjun Yan & Jun Yang & LaurenCohen, 2021. "User Interface and Firsthand Experience in Retail Investing," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(9), pages 4486-4523.
    18. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Priberny, Christopher & Schuster, Stephanie & Stoiber, Johannes & Weber, Martina & de Castro, Ivan & Kammler, Julia, 2016. "Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending – Evidence from two leading European platforms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 169-187.
    19. Fan, Yaoyao & Jiang, Yuxiang & John, Kose & Liu, Frank Hong, 2021. "From watchdog to watchman: Do independent directors monitor a CEO of their own age?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 206-229.
    20. Jianwen Li & Xiaofan Zhang & Jinyan Hu, 2021. "Strategic co-funding in informal finance market: evidence from China," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 329-349, January.
    21. Mariassunta Giannetti & Yishay Yafeh, 2012. "Do Cultural Differences Between Contracting Parties Matter? Evidence from Syndicated Bank Loans," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 365-383, February.
    22. Huan Tang, 2019. "Peer-to-Peer Lenders Versus Banks: Substitutes or Complements?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1900-1938.
    23. Chen, Xiao & Huang, Bihong & Ye, Dezhu, 2020. "Gender gap in peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    24. Mingfeng Lin & Siva Viswanathan, 2016. "Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1393-1414, May.
    25. Francesco D’Acunto & Marcel Prokopczuk & Michael Weber, 2019. "Historical Antisemitism, Ethnic Specialization, and Financial Development," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(3), pages 1170-1206.
    26. Chen, Jia & Jiang, Jiajun & Liu, Yu-jane, 2018. "Financial literacy and gender difference in loan performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 307-320.
    27. Xun Li & Yuxin Deng & Shanlin Li, 2020. "Gender differences in self-risk evaluation: evidence from the Renrendai online lending platform," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 485-496, January.
    28. Caglayan, Mustafa & Talavera, Oleksandr & Zhang, Wei, 2021. "Herding behaviour in P2P lending markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 27-41.
    29. Riza Emekter & Yanbin Tu & Benjamas Jirasakuldech & Min Lu, 2015. "Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 54-70, January.
    30. Jiang, Jiajun & Liu, Yu-Jane & Lu, Ruichang, 2020. "Social heterogeneity and local bias in peer-to-peer lending – evidence from China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 302-324.
    31. Devin G. Pope & Justin R. Sydnor, 2011. "What’s in a Picture?: Evidence of Discrimination from Prosper.com," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 46(1), pages 53-92.
    32. Lihui Tian & Gerhard Kling, 2022. "Financial inclusion and financial technology: finance for everyone?," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 1-2, January.
    33. Dr. Neelu Tiwari & Sneha, 2013. "Impact of Gender Diversity on the Performance of the Companies," Journal of Commerce and Trade, Society for Advanced Management Studies, vol. 8(12), pages 28-34, AprilOcto.
    34. Jiang, Jinglin & Liao, Li & Wang, Zhengwei & Zhang, Xiaoyan, 2021. "Government Affiliation and Peer-To-Peer Lending Platforms in China," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 87-106.
    35. Gonzalez, Laura & Loureiro, Yuliya Komarova, 2014. "When can a photo increase credit? The impact of lender and borrower profiles on online peer-to-peer loans," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 44-58.
    36. Jefferson Duarte & Stephan Siegel & Lance Young, 2012. "Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(8), pages 2455-2484.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jianwen, 2023. "MSMEs meet FinTech: Chance or challenge?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Jianwen Li & Jinyan Hu, 2022. "Migrants and default: Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 472-505, September.
    3. Jin, Ming & Yin, Mingmei & Chen, Zhongfei, 2021. "Do investors prefer borrowers from high level of trust cities? Evidence from China’s P2P market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Said Kaawach & Oskar Kowalewski & Oleksandr Talavera, 2023. "Automatic vs Manual Investing: Role of Past Performance," Discussion Papers 23-04, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    5. Qun Chen & Ji-Wen Li & Jian-Guo Liu & Jing-Ti Han & Yun Shi & Xun-Hua Guo, 2021. "Borrower Learning Effects: Do Prior Experiences Promote Continuous Successes in Peer-to-Peer Lending?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 963-986, August.
    6. Kai Lu & Zaiyan Wei & Tat Y. Chan, 2022. "Information Asymmetry Among Investors and Strategic Bidding in Peer-to-Peer Lending," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 824-845, September.
    7. Dongwoo Kim, 2023. "Can investors’ collective decision-making evolve? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending markets," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1323-1358, June.
    8. Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete & Juan Piñeiro-Chousa & M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Daniel Palacios-Marqués, 2022. "Crowdlending: mapping the core literature and research frontiers," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2381-2411, November.
    9. Pankaj Kumar Maskara & Emre Kuvvet & Gengxuan Chen, 2021. "The role of P2P platforms in enhancing financial inclusion in the United States: An analysis of peer‐to‐peer lending across the rural–urban divide," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(3), pages 747-774, September.
    10. Wolfgang Pointner & Burkhard Raunig, 2018. "A primer on peer-to-peer lending: immediate financial intermediation in practice," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/18, pages 36-51.
    11. Xueru Chen & Xiaoji Hu & Shenglin Ben, 2021. "How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1055-1082, December.
    12. D'Acunto, Francesco & Ghosh, Pulak & Jain, Rajiv & Rossi, Alberto G., 2022. "How costly are cultural biases?," LawFin Working Paper Series 34, Goethe University, Center for Advanced Studies on the Foundations of Law and Finance (LawFin).
    13. Zhu, Zongyuan, 2018. "Safety promise, moral hazard and financial supervision: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-5.
    14. Lu, Haitian & Wang, Bo & Wang, Haizhi & Zhao, Tianyu, 2020. "Does social capital matter for peer-to-peer-lending? Empirical evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Li, Jianwen & Hu, Jinyan, 2019. "Does university reputation matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 66-77.
    16. Caglayan, Mustafa & Talavera, Oleksandr & Xiong, Lin, 2022. "Female small business owners in China: Discouraged, not discriminated," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Liu, Yi & Yang, Menglong & Wang, Yudong & Li, Yongshan & Xiong, Tiancheng & Li, Anzhe, 2022. "Applying machine learning algorithms to predict default probability in the online credit market: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Ho, Kung-Cheng & Gu, Yan & Yan, Cheng & Gozgor, Giray, 2024. "Peer effects in the online peer-to-peer lending market: Ex-ante selection and ex-post learning," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. GUO, Jianfeng & LIU, Xiaojie & CUI, Changnan & GU, Fu, 2021. "Influence of nonspecific factors on the interest rate of online peer-to-peer microloans in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    20. Chen, Xiao & Chong, Zhaohui & Giudici, Paolo & Huang, Bihong, 2022. "Network centrality effects in peer to peer lending," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Homophilous intensity; Online lending; Bidding behavior; Economic effects;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:152:y:2023:i:c:s0378426623001000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.