IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v32y2019i2p524-563..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Birds of a Feather: The Impact of Homophily on the Propensity to Follow Financial Advice

Author

Listed:
  • Oscar Stolper
  • Andreas Walter

Abstract

Homophily—individuals’ affinity for others like them—is a powerful principle that governs whose opinions people attend to. Using nearly 2,400 advisory meetings, we find that homophily has a significant positive impact on the likelihood of following financial advice. The increased likelihood of following stems from homophily on gender and age for male clients and from sameness on marital and parental status for female advisees. Moreover, the homophily effect is mitigated by reduced information asymmetry between client and advisor and a long-term relationship with the bank. Our results suggest that client-advisor matching increases individuals’ propensity to follow financial advice. Received June 21, 2017; editorial decision June 7, 2018 by Editor Philip Strahan.

Suggested Citation

  • Oscar Stolper & Andreas Walter, 2019. "Birds of a Feather: The Impact of Homophily on the Propensity to Follow Financial Advice," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(2), pages 524-563.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:32:y:2019:i:2:p:524-563.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhy082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco D’Acunto & Andreas Fuster & Michael Weber, 2021. "Diverse Policy Committees Can Reach Underrepresented Groups," NBER Working Papers 29275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Shen, Lingbo, 2022. "Essays on behavioral finance and corporate finance," Other publications TiSEM a9b98a25-a208-4ba6-9344-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Fu, Fanjie & Fang, Jing & Zhang, Fan & Yao, Shujie & Ou, Jinghua, 2024. "CEOs' hometown connections and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. de Andres, Pablo & Garcia-Rodriguez, Inigo & Romero-Merino, M. Elena & Santamaria-Mariscal, Marcos, 2022. "Stakeholder governance and private benefits: The case of politicians in Spanish cajas," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1272-1292.
    5. Rubin, Amir & Rubin, Eran & Segal, Dan, 2023. "Editor home bias?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    6. Serwaah, Priscilla & Shneor, Rotem & Nyarko, Samuel Anokye & Nielsen, Kristian Roed, 2024. "Explaining gender differences in crowdfunding contribution intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Li, Jianwen & Zhang, Bo & Jiang, Mingming & Hu, Jinyan, 2023. "Homophilous intensity in the online lending market: Bidding behavior and economic effects," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Boyao Wu & Difang Huang & Muzi Chen, 2023. "Estimating contagion mechanism in global equity market with time‐zone effect," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(3), pages 543-572, September.
    9. Meyer, Steffen & Uhr, Charline & Loos, Benjamin & Hackethal, Andreas, 2023. "Switching from commissions on mutual funds to flat-fees: How are advisory clients affected?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 423-449.
    10. Boyao Wu & Difang Huang & Muzi Chen, 2024. "Estimating Contagion Mechanism in Global Equity Market with Time-Zone Effect," Papers 2404.04335, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:32:y:2019:i:2:p:524-563.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.