IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaitra/v118y2024ics0969699724000784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban air mobility for time-sensitive goods with explicit customer preferences: A case study on Chengdu

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Bozhi
  • Suo, Yining
  • Tang, Li
  • Li, Chenglong
  • Fu, Mengying
  • Huang, Longyang

Abstract

The technological innovation has gradually turned UAV delivery services in urban areas into a reality. As crucial stakeholders, urban residents have a growing demand for goods delivery, and they are in the process of understanding this new technology. Understanding their acceptance and quantifying their preferences can effectively promote the development of UAV delivery systems. While scholars have conducted extensive research on this topic, there remains a lack of detailed analysis regarding consumer heterogeneity and specific service experiences, especially in China, which is one of the largest potential markets for urban air mobility and UAV applications. This study addresses pertinent questions, including in high-density urban areas, the potential user characteristics of UAVs for instant delivery, the types of goods users prefer UAVs to transport, and how users prefer goods to be handed over to them. Conducted in Chengdu, a major city in southwest China, the survey collected 2,008 validated responses, encompassing potential users of urban air delivery. Employing a discrete choice model (DCM) for quantitative analysis, market share and willingness to pay were derived based on field data, with the identified issues designed as attribute variables integrated into the model. The findings reveal that under suitable services, the UAV market share can reach 21.2%, while electric bike and car deliveries persist as the mainstream in on-demand delivery, constituting 51.8% and 27.0%, respectively. Notably, consumers’ choices are significantly influenced by their socioeconomic status and key indicators. As the cost of UAVs increases relative to electric bike and car deliveries, respondents tend to prefer the electric bike, indicating that UAVs are not the preferred substitute. However, when the price falls below 9.5 CNY, UAVs become more appealing than cars. The identification of five latent classes reflects distinctly different user attitudes towards delivery services in China. The analysis of key attribute elasticity guides adjustments in delivery efficiency and pricing, aligning with market conditions. These results elucidate the intriguing psychology of Chengdu consumers when embracing this new technology. For actively accepting consumers, the hope is for UAV delivery to offer a more convenient service experience, with customized services especially between the arrival of UAVs and pick-up emerging as a distinctive feature. We also discusses regional heterogeneity and implications of the pandemic. As an effective supplement to existing studies, we posit that when UAVs meet customer demands for affordability and high-quality service, they will emerge as the primary force in Chengdu’s future urban air market.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Bozhi & Suo, Yining & Tang, Li & Li, Chenglong & Fu, Mengying & Huang, Longyang, 2024. "Urban air mobility for time-sensitive goods with explicit customer preferences: A case study on Chengdu," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:118:y:2024:i:c:s0969699724000784
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000784
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merkert, Rico & Beck, Matthew J. & Bushell, James, 2021. "Will It Fly? Adoption of the road pricing framework to manage drone use of airspace," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 156-170.
    2. Kim, Sang Hyun, 2020. "Choice model based analysis of consumer preference for drone delivery service," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Charlie Chen & Makoto Nakayama & Peter Ractham, 2023. "Increasing the intention of Gen Zers to adopt drone delivery services based on a three-step decision-making process," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2188987-218, December.
    4. Amalia Polydoropoulou & Athena Tsirimpa & Ioannis Karakikes & Ioannis Tsouros & Ioanna Pagoni, 2022. "Mode Choice Modeling for Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery: The Greek Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Wei Xie & Charlie Chen & Juthamon Sithipolvanichgul, 2022. "Understanding e-commerce customer behaviors to use drone delivery services: A privacy calculus view," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2102791-210, December.
    6. Amaya, Johanna & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira & Arellana, Julian & Allen, Jaime, 2021. "Urban freight logistics: What do citizens perceive?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zheng, Changhong & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic and air transportation: Successfully navigating the paper hurricane," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Idrees Waris & Rashid Ali & Anand Nayyar & Mohammed Baz & Ran Liu & Irfan Hameed, 2022. "An Empirical Evaluation of Customers’ Adoption of Drone Food Delivery Services: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Sham, Rohana & Chong, Han Xi & Cheng-Xi Aw, Eugene & Bibi Tkm Thangal, Thahira & Abdamia, Noranita binti, 2023. "Switching up the delivery game: Understanding switching intention to retail drone delivery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Fabio Borghetti & Claudia Caballini & Angela Carboni & Gaia Grossato & Roberto Maja & Benedetto Barabino, 2022. "The Use of Drones for Last-Mile Delivery: A Numerical Case Study in Milan, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Wang, Shenhao & Mo, Baichuan & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "Theory-based residual neural networks: A synergy of discrete choice models and deep neural networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 333-358.
    12. Lachapelle, Ugo & Burke, Matthew & Brotherton, Aiden & Leung, Abraham, 2018. "Parcel locker systems in a car dominant city: Location, characterisation and potential impacts on city planning and consumer travel access," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Noor Islam Jasim & Hairoladenan Kasim & Moamin A. Mahmoud, 2022. "Towards the Development of Smart and Sustainable Transportation System for Foodservice Industry: Modelling Factors Influencing Customer’s Intention to Adopt Drone Food Delivery (DFD) Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Hans E. Comtet & Karl-Arne Johannessen, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Pro-Innovative Leadership and Gender as an Enabler for Future Drone Transports in Healthcare Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Cai, Lanhui & Yuen, Kum Fai & Xie, Diancen & Fang, Mingjie & Wang, Xueqin, 2021. "Consumer's usage of logistics technologies: Integration of habit into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Jinsoo Hwang & Dohyung Kim & Jinkyung Jenny Kim, 2020. "How to Form Behavioral Intentions in the Field of Drone Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Kapser, Sebastian & Abdelrahman, Mahmoud & Bernecker, Tobias, 2021. "Autonomous delivery vehicles to fight the spread of Covid-19 – How do men and women differ in their acceptance?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 183-198.
    18. Hwang, Jinsoo & Kim, Jinkyung Jenny & Lee, Kwang-Woo, 2021. "Investigating consumer innovativeness in the context of drone food delivery services: Its impact on attitude and behavioral intentions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Hyun Sang An & Arim Park & Ju Myung Song & Christina Chung, 2022. "Consumers’ adoption of parcel locker service: protection and technology perspectives," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2144096-214, December.
    20. AlKheder, Sharaf & Bash, Amina & Al Baghli, Zahra & Al Hubaini, Rahaf & Al Kader, Abedallah, 2023. "Customer perception and acceptance of autonomous delivery vehicles in the State of Kuwait during COVID-19," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    21. Hensher,David A. & Rose,John M. & Greene,William H., 2015. "Applied Choice Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107465923, November.
    22. Yaprak, Ümit & Kılıç, Fatih & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2021. "Is the Covid-19 pandemic strong enough to change the online order delivery methods? Changes in the relationship between attitude and behavior towards order delivery by drone," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    23. Charlie Chen & Steve Leon & Peter Ractham, 2022. "Will customers adopt last-mile drone delivery services? An analysis of drone delivery in the emerging market economy," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2074340-207, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raj Bridgelall, 2024. "Spatial Analysis of Middle-Mile Transport for Advanced Air Mobility: A Case Study of Rural North Dakota," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Raj Bridgelall & Denver Tolliver, 2024. "Transforming Healthcare Delivery with Advanced Air Mobility: A Rural Study with GIS-Based Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sham, Rohana & Chong, Han Xi & Cheng-Xi Aw, Eugene & Bibi Tkm Thangal, Thahira & Abdamia, Noranita binti, 2023. "Switching up the delivery game: Understanding switching intention to retail drone delivery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Wang, Ning & Mutzner, Nico & Blanchet, Karl, 2023. "Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Yuen, Kum Fai & Cai, Lanhui & Wee, Shaun Chuin Kit & Wang, Xueqin, 2024. "Pandemic-driven acceptance of urban drone deliveries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 356-370.
    4. Massimo Di Gangi & Antonio Polimeni & Orlando Marco Belcore, 2023. "Freight Distribution in Small Islands: Integration between Naval Services and Parcel Lockers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Yu, Vincent F. & Aloina, Grace & Eccarius, Timo, 2023. "Adoption intentions of home-refill delivery service for fast-moving consumer goods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Tamakloe, Reuben & Zhang, Kaihan & Atandzi, Jonathan & Park, Dongjoo, 2024. "Examining urban delivery service user profiles and determinants of drone delivery adoption in Ghana considering usage before and after the COVID-19 pandemic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 279-294.
    7. Sabino, Hullysses & Almeida, Rodrigo V.S. & Moraes, Lucas Baptista de & Silva, Walber Paschoal da & Guerra, Raphael & Malcher, Carlos & Passos, Diego & Passos, Fernanda G.O., 2022. "A systematic literature review on the main factors for public acceptance of drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Schmidt, Sebastian & Saraceni, Adriana, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Sun, Shanshan & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "An investigation of self-service technology usage during the COVID-19 pandemic: The changing perceptions of ‘self’ and technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Liu, Feng & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Consumers' paradoxical motives of co-creation: From self-service technology to crowd-sourcing platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. ElSayed, Mo & Foda, Ahmed & Mohamed, Moataz, 2024. "The impact of civil airspace policies on the viability of adopting autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles in last-mile applications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 37-54.
    13. Koh, Le Yi & Lee, Jia Yi & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Urban drone adoption: Addressing technological, privacy and task–technology fit concerns," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Frederiksen, Marianne Harbo & Wolf, Patricia & Klotz, Ute, 2024. "Citizen visions of drone uses and impacts in 2057: Far-future insights for policy decision-makers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Canessa, Carolin & Venus, Terese E. & Wiesmeier, Miriam & Mennig, Philipp & Sauer, Johannes, 2023. "Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Sant'Anna, Ana Claudia & Bergtold, Jason & Shanoyan, Aleksan & Caldas, Marcellus & Granco, Gabriel, 2021. "Deal or No Deal? Analysis of Bioenergy Feedstock Contract Choice with Multiple Opt-out Options and Contract Attribute Substitutability," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315289, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    18. Boyce, Christopher & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Hanley, Nick, 2019. "Personality and economic choices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 82-100.
    19. Garaus, Marion & Hudáková, Melánia, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tourists’ air travel intentions: The role of perceived health risk and trust in the airline," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    20. Giovanna Piracci & Emilia Lamonaca & Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2024. "On the willingness to pay for food sustainability labelling: A meta‐analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 329-345, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:118:y:2024:i:c:s0969699724000784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-air-transport-management/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.