The effect of rules shifting supreme court jurisdiction from mandatory to discretionary—An empirical lesson from Taiwan
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2011.12.005
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.
Other versions of this item:
- Eisenberg, Theodore & Huang, Kuo-Chang, 2011. "The Effect of Rules Shifting Supreme Court Jurisdiction from Mandatory to Discretionary - An Empirical Lesson from Taiwan," IEL Working Papers 2, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
References listed on IDEAS
- Jonathan P. Kastellec & Jeffrey R. Lax, 2008. "Case Selection and the Study of Judicial Politics," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3), pages 407-446, September.
- Kornhauser, Lewis A, 1992. "Modeling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 441-470, October.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Yun‐chien Chang & Theodore Eisenberg & Han‐Wei Ho & Martin T. Wells, 2015. "Pain and Suffering Damages in Wrongful Death Cases: An Empirical Study," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 128-160, March.
- Giovanni B. Ramello, 2016. "The past, present and future of comparative law and economics," Chapters, in: Theodore Eisenberg & Giovanni B. Ramello (ed.), Comparative Law and Economics, chapter 1, pages 3-22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Melcarne Alessandro & Ramello Giovanni B., 2015.
"Judicial Independence, Judges’ Incentives and Efficiency,"
Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 149-169, July.
- Alessandro Melcarne & Giovanni Battista Ramello, 2015. "Judicial Independence, Judges’ Incentives and Efficiency," Post-Print hal-01386058, HAL.
- Melcarne, Alessandro & Ramello, Giovanni B., 2015. "Judicial Independence, Judges’ Incentives and Efficiency," IEL Working Papers 19, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
- Przemysław Banasik & Katarzyna Metelska-Szaniawska & Małgorzata Godlewska & Sylwia Morawska, 2022. "Determinants of judges’ career choices and productivity: a Polish case study," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 81-107, February.
- Przemyslaw Banasik & Monika Odlanicka-Poczobutt & Maciej Wolny & Sylwia Morawska, 2020. "Preliminary Identification of Quantitative Factors Determining the Duration of Court Proceedings in Commercial Cases," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 279-293.
- Alessandro Melcarne, 2017.
"Careerism and judicial behavior,"
European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 241-264, October.
- Alessandro Melcarne, 2017. "Careerism and judicial behavior," Post-Print hal-01611563, HAL.
- Alberto Cassone & Giovanni Ramello, 2011.
"The simple economics of class action: private provision of club and public goods,"
European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 205-224, October.
- Cassone, Alberto & Ramello, Giovanni B., 2011. "The Simple Economics of Class Action: Private Provision of Club and Public Goods," IEL Working Papers 3, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
- Alberto Cassone & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2011. "The Simple Economics of Class Action: Private Provision of Club and Public Goods," ICER Working Papers 06-2011, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
- Roberto Ippoliti & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2018. "Governance of tax courts," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 317-338, November.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Tom S Clark, 2016. "Scope and precedent: judicial rule-making under uncertainty," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 28(3), pages 353-384, July.
- Niblett, Anthony, 2013. "Tracking inconsistent judicial behavior," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 9-20.
- List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010.
"Introduction to judgment aggregation,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 441-466, March.
- List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Christian List & Ben Polak, 2010. "Introduction to Judgment Aggregation," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1753, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Christian List & Ben Polak, 2010. "Introduction to Judgment Aggregation," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000006, David K. Levine.
- Arthur Dyevre & Nicolas Lampach, 2021. "Issue attention on international courts: Evidence from the European Court of Justice," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 793-815, October.
- Clark, Tom S. & Montagnes, B. Pablo & Spenkuch, Jörg L., 2022.
"Politics from the Bench? Ideology and Strategic Voting in the U.S. Supreme Court,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
- Tom S. Clark & B. Pablo Montagnes & Jörg L. Spenkuch, 2018. "Politics from the Bench? Ideology and Strategic Voting in the U.S. Supreme Court," CESifo Working Paper Series 7264, CESifo.
- Gennaioli, Nicola & Shleifer, Andrei, 2007.
"Overruling and the instability of law,"
Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 309-328, June.
- Gennaioli, Nicola & Shleifer, Andrei, 2007. "Overruling and the instability of law," Scholarly Articles 27867133, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2007. "Overruling and the Instability of Law," NBER Working Papers 12913, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Pierre Bentata & Romain Espinosa & Yolande Hiriart, 2019.
"Correction Activities by France’s Supreme Courts and Control over their Dockets,"
Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 129(2), pages 169-204.
- Pierre Bentata & Romain Espinosa & Yolande Hiriart, 2019. "Correction Activities by France’s Supreme Courts and Control over their Dockets," Post-Print halshs-02167246, HAL.
- Dietrich, Franz & Mongin, Philippe, 2010.
"The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 562-582, March.
- Dietrich, F.K. & Mongin, P., 2008. "The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Dietrich, Franz & Mongin, Philippe, 2010. "The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27896, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Post-Print hal-00528387, HAL.
- Shay Lavie, 2017. "Discretionary review and undesired cases," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 265-285, October.
- Mongin, Philippe & Dietrich, Franz, 2011.
"An interpretive account of logical aggregation theory,"
HEC Research Papers Series
941, HEC Paris.
- Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
- Miguel Santolino & Magnus Söderberg, 2014.
"Modelling appellate courts’ responses in motor injury disputes,"
European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 393-407, December.
- Magnus Söderberg & Miguel Santolino, 2012. "Modelling appellate courts' responses in motor injury disputes," Post-Print hal-00869780, HAL.
- Miguel Santolino & Magnus Söderberg, 2012. "Modelling appellate courts' responses in motor injury disputes," Post-Print hal-00840717, HAL.
- JBrandon Duck-Mayr, 2022. "Explaining legal inconsistency," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 34(1), pages 107-126, January.
- Keith Carlson & Michael A. Livermore & Daniel N. Rockmore, 2020. "The Problem of Data Bias in the Pool of Published U.S. Appellate Court Opinions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 224-261, June.
- Philippe Mongin, 2012.
"The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
- Mongin, Philippe, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 37752, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Post-Print hal-00733521, HAL.
- Bustos, Álvaro & Tiller, Emerson H., 2021. "Authorial control of the Supreme Court: Chief Justice Roberts and the Obamacare surprise," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
- Bernardo Guimaraes & Bruno Meyerhof Salama, 2023.
"Permitting Prohibitions,"
The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52(1), pages 241-271.
- Guimaraes, Bernardo & Salama, Bruno Meyerhof, 2021. "Permitting prohibitions," Textos para discussão 544, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
- Pablo T. Spiller & Rafael Gely, 2007.
"Strategic Judicial Decision Making,"
NBER Working Papers
13321, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Pablo T Spiller & Rafael Gely, 2007. "Strategic Judicial Decision Making," Levine's Working Paper Archive 122247000000001409, David K. Levine.
- Whitman, Douglas Glen, 2005. "The Role of Panels in Enhancing Legal Predictability," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 541-555, December.
- Brennan, Geoffrey, 2001. "Collective coherence?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 197-211, June.
- Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2014. "From degrees of belief to beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 58257, University Library of Munich, Germany.
More about this item
Keywords
Courts; Appeals; Jurisdiction; Mandatory jurisdiction; Discretionary jurisdiction; Taiwan Supreme Court;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process
- N45 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Asia including Middle East
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:3-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/irle .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.