IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ireced/v28y2018icp11-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online assessment, adaptive feedback and the importance of visual learning for students. The advantages, with a few caveats, of using MapleTA

Author

Listed:
  • Pezzino, Mario

Abstract

The paper highlights the importance and necessity of a versatile and reliable platform for online assessment in higher education. Recent technological developments allow instructors to go beyond standard multiple choice questions (MCQs). The paper considers, in particular, two important aspects: (i) embedding visual and interactive material in assignment questions that favours reasoning and learning and (ii) the importance of questions and feedback that can adapt to the particular performance of students. To reinforce the message, the paper shows how the latest release of the platform MapleTA could represent a powerful tool in the hands of educators in those fields where algebraic and diagrammatic analysis is essential to the learning process, such as mathematics, economics and business.

Suggested Citation

  • Pezzino, Mario, 2018. "Online assessment, adaptive feedback and the importance of visual learning for students. The advantages, with a few caveats, of using MapleTA," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 11-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:28:y:2018:i:c:p:11-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2018.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388017300415
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iree.2018.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olczak, Matthew, 2014. "Evaluating the impact of a web-based resource on student learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 16(PB), pages 156-169.
    2. Steven Yamarik, 2007. "Does Cooperative Learning Improve Student Learning Outcomes?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 259-277, July.
    3. Maureen J. Lage & Glenn J. Platt & Michael Treglia, 2000. "Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 30-43, December.
    4. Al-Bahrani, Abdullah & Holder, Kim & Moryl, Rebecca L. & Ryan Murphy, Patrick & Patel, Darshak, 2016. "Putting yourself in the picture with an ‘ECONSelfie’: Using student-generated photos to enhance introductory economics courses," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 16-22.
    5. Michael Watts & Georg Schaur, 2011. "Teaching and Assessment Methods in Undergraduate Economics: A Fourth National Quinquennial Survey," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 294-309, July.
    6. Roach, Travis, 2014. "Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 74-84.
    7. Parama Chaudhury & Christian Spielmann, 2016. "Let's Make a Movie! Introducing Economics With a Multimedia Project," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 1(1), pages 17-41, June.
    8. Pezzino, Mario, 2016. "Understanding strategic competition using numerical simulations and dynamic diagrams in Mathematica," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-47.
    9. Vazquez, Jose J. & Chiang, Eric P., 2014. "A picture is worth a thousand words (at least): The effective use of visuals in the economics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 109-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter N. Kiriri, 2022. "Management of Performance in Higher Education Institutions: the Application of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC)," European Journal of Education Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejed_v5_i.
    2. Hussein Albazar, 2020. "A New Automated Forms Generation Algorithm for Online Assessment," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Rodrigo Martín-García & Carmen López-Martín & Raquel Arguedas-Sanz, 2020. "Collaborative Learning Communities for Sustainable Employment through Visual Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jill Caviglia‐Harris, 2016. "Flipping the Undergraduate Economics Classroom: Using Online Videos to Enhance Teaching and Learning," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 321-331, July.
    2. Gemma Abió & Manuela Alcáñiz & Marta Gómez-Puig & Gloria Rubert & Mónica Serrano & Alexandrina Stoyanova & Montserrat Vilalta-Bufí, 2016. "“Retaking a course in Economics: Innovative methodologies to simulate academic performance in large groups”," IREA Working Papers 201609, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Apr 2016.
    3. Rita A. Balaban & Donna B. Gilleskie & Uyen Tran, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 269-287, October.
    4. Fritz Dresselhaus & Jessika A. Bohlmann & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2015. "Assessing the impact of just-in-time methodology, in-lecture activities, and tutor-assisted post-lecture activities in the course experience of first year students in Economics at the University of Pr," Working Papers 562, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    5. Gourley, Patrick, 2021. "Back to basics: How reading the text and taking notes improves learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    6. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    7. Jennjou Chen & Tsui-Fang Lin, 2020. "Do Cooperative-Based Learning Groups Help Students Learn Microeconomics?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    8. Boulatoff, Catherine & Cyrus, Teresa L., 2022. "Improving student outcomes in large introductory courses," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    9. repec:eee:ireced:v:31:y:2019:i:c:p:- is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Becker, Ralf & Proud, Steven, 2018. "Flipping quantitative tutorials," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 59-73.
    11. Lombardini, Chiara & Lakkala, Minna & Muukkonen, Hanni, 2018. "The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-28.
    12. Tisha L. N. Emerson & Linda K. English & KimMarie McGoldrick, 2018. "The High Costs of Large Enrollment Classes: Can Cooperative Learning Help?," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 455-474, June.
    13. Olitsky, Neal H. & Cosgrove, Sarah B., 2016. "The better blend? Flipping the principles of microeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-11.
    14. A. Arrighetti & A. Lasagni, 2018. "Insegnare Economia Industriale ‘in a digital age’," Economics Department Working Papers 2018-EP06, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    15. Peter Mikek, 2023. "A Flipped Classroom Experiment in Growth Theory," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 433-456, June.
    16. Calimeris, Lauren, 2018. "Effects of flipping the principles of microeconomics class: Does scheduling matter?," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 29-43.
    17. Rousu, Matthew C. & Melichar, Mark & Hackenberry, Bailey, 2021. "Using Music to Teach Agricultural, Applied, and Environmental Economics," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 3(4), November.
    18. Dowell, Chelsea T. & Duncan, Daniel F., 2016. "Periscoping economics through someone else’s eyes: A real world (Twitter) app," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 34-39.
    19. Xiaodan Zhou & Ling-Hsiu Chen & Chin-Ling Chen, 2019. "Collaborative Learning by Teaching: A Pedagogy between Learner-Centered and Learner-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Rafael Ferreira dos Santos & Lilia Ribeiro Guerra & Bruno Leal Alves & Selma Ribeiro de Paiva & Ana Lafetá Cabral & Helena C. Castro* & Ana Joffily*, 2018. "Teaching Biotechnology: A Demand Still to be Fully Attended," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(4), pages 13-18, 04-2018.
    21. John T. Dalton & Andrew J. Logan, 2022. "Teaching and learning Schumpeter: A dialogue between professor and student," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 235-256, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Online assessment; Adaptive questions; Visual learning; MapleTA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:28:y:2018:i:c:p:11-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.