IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v90y2022ics0160289621001008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial ability as a distinct domain of human cognition: An evolutionary perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Geary, David C.

Abstract

Psychometric studies have consistently identified spatial abilities as a broad domain of human cognition. Spatial abilities are in fact found in species in which engagement with the physical world, as in prey capture or mate searches, influences survival or reproductive prospects and much is now known about the brain and cognitive systems that support these activities. Sex differences in spatial abilities are found in species in which one sex or the other engages the physical world in more complex ways, such as having a larger home range. Sex differences provide a unique opportunity to study the influence of evolutionary pressures on cognition, because the study of males and females from the same species controls for many aspects of evolutionary history. When there are differences in past selection pressures on males and females they are typically related to reproductive demands. The approach is illustrated here for spatial abilities and provides a blueprint for linking psychometric and evolutionary approaches to the study of human spatial and other abilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Geary, David C., 2022. "Spatial ability as a distinct domain of human cognition: An evolutionary perspective," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:90:y:2022:i:c:s0160289621001008
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2021.101616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289621001008
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caemmerer, Jacqueline M. & Keith, Timothy Z. & Reynolds, Matthew R., 2020. "Beyond individual intelligence tests: Application of Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Brian M. Wood & Jacob A. Harris & David A. Raichlen & Herman Pontzer & Katherine Sayre & Amelia Sancilio & Colette Berbesque & Alyssa N. Crittenden & Audax Mabulla & Richard McElreath & Elizabeth Cash, 2021. "Gendered movement ecology and landscape use in Hadza hunter-gatherers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 436-446, April.
    3. Wai, Jonathan & Hodges, Jaret & Makel, Matthew C., 2018. "Sex differences in ability tilt in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 35-year examination," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 76-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coyle, Thomas R., 2022. "Sex differences in spatial and mechanical tilt: Support for investment theories," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Coyle, Thomas R. & Greiff, Samuel, 2023. "Carbon is to life as g is to _____: A review of the contributions to the special issue on specific abilities in intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédérik Saltré & Joël Chadœuf & Thomas Higham & Monty Ochocki & Sebastián Block & Ellyse Bunney & Bastien Llamas & Corey J. A. Bradshaw, 2024. "Environmental conditions associated with initial northern expansion of anatomically modern humans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Sadowski, Ireneusz & Zawistowska, Alicja, 2020. "The net effect of ability tilt in gendered STEM-related choices," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Bruton, Oliver J., 2021. "Is there a “g-neuron”? Establishing a systematic link between general intelligence (g) and the von Economo neuron," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Zullo, Matteo, 2022. "(No) Trade-off between numeracy and verbal reasoning development: PISA evidence from Italy's academic tracking," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Protzko, John & Colom, Roberto, 2021. "A new beginning of intelligence research. Designing the playground," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Oberleiter, Sandra & Fries, Jonathan & Schock, Laura S. & Steininger, Benedikt & Pietschnig, Jakob, 2023. "Predicting cross-national sex differences in large-scale assessments of students' reading literacy, mathematics, and science achievement: Evidence from PIRLS and TIMSS," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Reynolds, Matthew R. & Hajovsky, Daniel B. & Caemmerer, Jacqueline M., 2022. "The sexes do not differ in general intelligence, but they do in some specifics," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Wilson, Christopher J. & Bowden, Stephen C. & Byrne, Linda K. & Joshua, Nicole R. & Marx, Wolfgang & Weiss, Lawrence G., 2023. "The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Stern, Charlotta & Madison, Guy, 2022. "Sex differences and occupational choice Theorizing for policy informed by behavioral science✰," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 694-702.
    10. Ji Hoon Ryoo & Sunhee Park & Hongwook Suh & Jaehwa Choi & Jongkyum Kwon, 2022. "Development of a New Measure of Cognitive Ability Using Automatic Item Generation and Its Psychometric Properties," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    11. Li, Dai & Wang, Yizhen & Li, Lantian, 2023. "Educational choice has greater effects on sex ratios of college STEM majors than has the greater male variance in general intelligence (g)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Coyle, Thomas R., 2021. "White-Black differences in tech tilt: Support for Spearman's law and investment theories," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Aija Klavina & Viktors Veliks & Inta Gulevska & Aleksandrs Aniscenko & Juris Porozovs & Anna Zusa, 2022. "Partly and Fully Supervised Physical Exercise Effects on Cognitive Functions and Movement Proficiency of Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Michael D Coovert & Winston Bennett Jr, 2022. "The importance of identifying the dimensionality of constructs employed in simulation and training for AI," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 19(2), pages 229-236, April.
    15. Vieira, Bruno Hebling & Pamplona, Gustavo Santo Pedro & Fachinello, Karim & Silva, Alice Kamensek & Foss, Maria Paula & Salmon, Carlos Ernesto Garrido, 2022. "On the prediction of human intelligence from neuroimaging: A systematic review of methods and reporting," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    16. Dominik Deffner & David Mezey & Benjamin Kahl & Alexander Schakowski & Pawel Romanczuk & Charley M. Wu & Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers, 2024. "Collective incentives reduce over-exploitation of social information in unconstrained human groups," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Coyle, Thomas R., 2023. "Sex differences in tech tilt and academic tilt in adolescence: Processing speed mediates age-tilt relations," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Loehlin, John C., 2019. "Cognitive clustering—How general?," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 19-22.
    19. Dunkel, Curtis S. & Madison, Guy, 2022. "The possible role of field independence/dependence on developmental sex differences in general intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:90:y:2022:i:c:s0160289621001008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.