IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v76y2019ics0160289619300157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should students be smart, curious, or both? Fluid intelligence, openness, and interest co-shape the acquisition of reading and math competence

Author

Listed:
  • Lechner, Clemens M.
  • Miyamoto, Ai
  • Knopf, Thomas

Abstract

Developmental theories of intelligence in the tradition of Cattell's investment theory posit that gains in crystallized intelligence (gc) depend mainly on fluid intelligence (gf) but also on a range of so-called intellectual investment traits, such as Openness to Experience and interest in a subject area. However, the relative predictive power of, and the precise nature of the interplay between, gf and different intellectual investment traits remains incompletely understood. In this study, we use large-scale, multi-wave data on secondary school students from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS; N = 4646) to investigate how gf, Openness, and subject-specific interest relate to baseline levels and change over two years in gc in two domains, reading and math. Results of latent-variable models revealed that gf and interest, and to a lesser extent, Openness, predicted higher initial levels and stronger gains over two years in reading competence and mathematical competence. Moreover, results yielded strong support for the notion that gf interacts synergistically with interest in reading and math in producing (gains in) reading competence and mathematical competence. In other words, gf and interest cross-fertilize each other, with students who have both high gf and high interest showing the highest rate of skill and knowledge acquisition. Our findings contribute to developmental theories of intelligence by providing further support for the claim that gf and intellectual investment traits are both essential for the development of gc—and by showing that the interplay between gc and investment traits is interactive and synergistic in nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Lechner, Clemens M. & Miyamoto, Ai & Knopf, Thomas, 2019. "Should students be smart, curious, or both? Fluid intelligence, openness, and interest co-shape the acquisition of reading and math competence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:76:y:2019:i:c:s0160289619300157
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2019.101378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289619300157
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saß, Steffani & Schütte, Kerstin & Kampa, Nele & Köller, Olaf, 2021. "Continuous time models support the reciprocal relations between academic achievement and fluid intelligence over the course of a school year," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Laible, Marie-Christine & Anger, Silke & Baumann, Martina, 2020. "Personality Traits and Further Training," IAB-Discussion Paper 202034, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:76:y:2019:i:c:s0160289619300157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.