IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v24y1999i3p219-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-optimality of a linear combination of proportional and non-proportional reinsurance

Author

Listed:
  • Hurlimann, W.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hurlimann, W., 1999. "Non-optimality of a linear combination of proportional and non-proportional reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 219-227, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:24:y:1999:i:3:p:219-227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-6687(98)00054-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaari, Menahem E, 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 95-115, January.
    2. Hurlimann, Werner, 1994. "A note on experience rating, reinsurance and premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 197-204, July.
    3. Bäuerle, Nicole & Müller, Alfred, 1998. "Modeling and Comparing Dependencies in Multivariate Risk Portfolios," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 59-76, May.
    4. Denneberg, Dieter, 1990. "Premium Calculation: Why Standard Deviation Should be Replaced by Absolute Deviation1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 181-190, November.
    5. Wang, Shaun, 1996. "Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 71-92, May.
    6. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R. & Panjer, Harry H., 1997. "Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 173-183, November.
    7. Hurlimann, Werner, 1988. "On algebraic equivalence of tariffing systems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 35-37, January.
    8. De Pril, Nelson, 1989. "The Aggregate Claims Distribution in the Individual Model with Arbitrary Positive Claims," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 9-24, April.
    9. Koller, Bruno & Dettwyler, Nicole, 1997. "APS Reinsurance," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 329-337, November.
    10. Hürlimann, W., 1990. "Pseudo Compound Poisson Distributions in Risk Theory," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 57-79, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debora Daniela Escobar & Georg Ch. Pflug, 2020. "The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 771-794, September.
    2. Stanislaw Heilpern, 2002. "Using Choquet integral in economics," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 53-73, January.
    3. Daniela Escobar & Georg Pflug, 2018. "The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness," Papers 1809.06592, arXiv.org.
    4. Leitner, Johannes, 2005. "Dilatation monotonous Choquet integrals," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 994-1006, December.
    5. Albrecht, Peter & Huggenberger, Markus, 2017. "The fundamental theorem of mutual insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 180-188.
    6. Tim J. Boonen, 2016. "Optimal Reinsurance with Heterogeneous Reference Probabilities," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Laeven, Roger J. A. & Goovaerts, Marc J., 2004. "An optimization approach to the dynamic allocation of economic capital," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 299-319, October.
    8. Young, Virginia R. & Zariphopoulou, Thaleia, 2000. "Computation of distorted probabilities for diffusion processes via stochastic control methods," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Goncalves Marcelo & Kolev Nikolai & Fabris Antonio, 2008. "Bounds for Distorted Risk Measures," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 243-255, January.
    10. John A. Major & Stephen J. Mildenhall, 2020. "Pricing and Capital Allocation for Multiline Insurance Firms With Finite Assets in an Imperfect Market," Papers 2008.12427, arXiv.org.
    11. Belles-Sampera, Jaume & Merigó, José M. & Guillén, Montserrat & Santolino, Miguel, 2013. "The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 411-420.
    12. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R., 1998. "Ordering risks: Expected utility theory versus Yaari's dual theory of risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 145-161, June.
    13. Koster, Maurice & Boonen, Tim J., 2019. "Constrained stochastic cost allocation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 20-30.
    14. Dhaene, Jan & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Zhang, Yiying, 2022. "Systemic risk: Conditional distortion risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 126-145.
    15. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2022. "A marginal indemnity function approach to optimal reinsurance under the Vajda condition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 928-944.
    16. Hurlimann, Werner, 2001. "Distribution-free comparison of pricing principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 351-360, June.
    17. Hurlimann, Werner, 2006. "A note on generalized distortion risk measures," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 267-272, December.
    18. Greselin, Francesca & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2015. "Measuring economic inequality and risk: a unifying approach based on personal gambles, societal preferences and references," MPRA Paper 65892, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Volker Kratschmer & Alexander Schied & Henryk Zahle, 2012. "Comparative and qualitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures," Papers 1204.2458, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2014.
    20. Miguel Sordo & Jorge Navarro & José Sarabia, 2014. "Distorted Lorenz curves: models and comparisons," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 761-780, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:24:y:1999:i:3:p:219-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.