IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/injoed/v84y2021ics0738059321000614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why students leave Chinese elite universities for doctoral studies abroad: Institutional habitus, career script and college graduates’ decision to study abroad

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Liping
  • Shen, Wenqin
  • Xie, Ailei

Abstract

Despite the growing research capacity and rise of Chinese universities in global rankings, the number of Chinese students going abroad to pursue doctorate degrees is still large. Previous studies argue that a series of pull–push factors at systemic and individual levels affect the motivation and outbound mobility of students. However, the factors at the institutional level and the changing landscape of Chinese higher education have been rarely examined. To fill this gap, this study interviewed 31 graduates from the chemistry department of an elite university in China, which ranks among the top universities in the world. The insights offered in this study are based on the concepts of institutional habitus and career scripts in academic career research and highlight the motivations of students to go abroad for doctoral education. One of the arguments of this article is that students’ motivation to go abroad is influenced by organisational factors (that is, institutional habitus) and career scripts, which are partly shaped by central government policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Liping & Shen, Wenqin & Xie, Ailei, 2021. "Why students leave Chinese elite universities for doctoral studies abroad: Institutional habitus, career script and college graduates’ decision to study abroad," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:84:y:2021:i:c:s0738059321000614
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059321000614
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Müller, Moritz & Cowan, Robin & Barnard, Helena, 2018. "On the value of foreign PhDs in the developing world: Training versus selection effects in the case of South Africa," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 886-900.
    2. David Cyranoski & Natasha Gilbert & Heidi Ledford & Anjali Nayar & Mohammed Yahia, 2011. "Education: The PhD factory," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7343), pages 276-279, April.
    3. Ann E. Austin, 2002. "Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 94-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiong, Weiyan & Yang, Jiale & Shen, Wenqin, 2022. "Higher education reform in China: A comprehensive review of policymaking, implementation, and outcomes since 1978," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spronken-Smith, Rachel, 2018. "REFORMING DOCTORAL EDUCATION: There is a Better Way," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt4s08b4jx, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    2. Andrea M Zimmerman, 2018. "Navigating the path to a biomedical science career," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Catherine E. Déri & Émilie Tremblay-Wragg & Sara Mathieu-C., 2022. "Academic Writing Groups in Higher Education: History and State of Play," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-85, February.
    4. Hottenrott, Hanna & Lawson, Cornelia, 2014. "Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers’ career paths," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201409, University of Turin.
    5. Shibayama, Sotaro, 2019. "Sustainable development of science and scientists: Academic training in life science labs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 676-692.
    6. Sofia Patsali & Michele Pezzoni & Fabiana Visentin, 2021. "The Impact of Research Independence on PhD Students’ Careers: Large-Scale Evidence from France," Post-Print hal-03564708, HAL.
    7. Jeongeun Kim & Molly Ott & Lindsey Dippold, 2020. "University and Department Influences on Scientists’ Occupational Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(2), pages 197-228, March.
    8. Niels Stijn & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Martine Veelen, 2018. "Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: evidence from Route 128," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 674-713, June.
    9. Henry Sauermann & Michael Roach, 2011. "Not All Scientists pay to be Scientists:," DRUID Working Papers 11-03, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    10. Santos, João M. & Horta, Hugo & Heitor, Manuel, 2016. "Too many PhDs? An invalid argument for countries developing their scientific and academic systems: The case of Portugal," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 352-362.
    11. Gerardo Reyes-Ruiz & Alejandro Barragán-Ocaña & Samuel Olmos-Peña & María Eugenia González-à vila, 2018. "Perceptions of High School Students on Academic Training for Science and Technology in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    12. Ganguli, Ina & Gaule, Patrick & Čugalj, Danijela Vuletić, 2020. "Biased Beliefs and Entry into Scientific Careers," IZA Discussion Papers 13475, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Jan Marco Leimeister & Jörg Becker & Armin Heinzl & Robert Winter & David Gefen, 2019. "Doing a Doctorate in BISE in Germany, Austria and Switzerland? A Debate on the Why, What and How," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 759-766, December.
    14. Andrea Seidl & Stefan Wrzaczek & Fouad El Ouardighi & Gustav Feichtinger, 2016. "Optimal Career Strategies and Brain Drain in Academia," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 268-295, January.
    15. Michael Roach & Henry Sauermann, 2017. "The declining interest in an academic career," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Rogge, Jan-Christoph, 2020. "Does Academia Still Call? Experiences of Academics in Germany and the United States," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 187-210.
    17. Rossello, Giulia & Martinelli, Arianna, 2023. "Breach of academic values and digital deviant behaviour: The case of Sci-Hub," MERIT Working Papers 2023-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    18. Corbin M. Campbell & Jessica Ostrow Michel & Shikha Patel & Maia Gelashvili, 2019. "College Teaching from Multiple Angles: A Multi-trait Multi-method Analysis of College Courses," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(5), pages 711-735, August.
    19. Emil Israel & Nir Cohen & Daniel Czamanski, 2019. "Return on capital? Determinants of counter-migration among early career Israeli STEM researchers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Maxim Kotsemir & Ekaterina Dyachenko & Alena Nefedova, 2022. "Mobile young researchers and their non-mobile ‘twins’: who is winning the academic race?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7307-7332, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:84:y:2021:i:c:s0738059321000614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-educational-development .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.