IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijocip/v30y2020ics1874548220300391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing an evaluation method for SCADA-Controlled urban gas infrastructure hierarchical design using multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Wu
  • Hui, Longxuan
  • Lu, Yuting
  • Tang, Jinsong

Abstract

Currently, China's urban gas supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system faces numerous problems, such as weak information system architecture, incomplete information (& communication) infrastructure design, and an uneven development level. A capable comprehensive evaluation method is urgently needed to achieve a hierarchical design of their infrastructure. This study introduces a multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), coupled with particle swarm optimization (PSO). By combining qualitative and quantitative analysis, an evaluation index system for a multi-dimensional SCADA-controlled urban gas infrastructure hierarchical design is developed based on the scale of operations, regional safety risk, and management situation. The consistency test, correction, and evaluation index weight value of the judgement matrix in AHP are transformed into a nonlinear constrained optimization problem, which is then solved using PSO. Then, combined with the fuzzy mathematical theory, the membership function is used to compute the membership levels of the indicators at all levels. Finally, the multi-dimensional and multi-index fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the hierarchical design of SCADA-controlled gas infrastructure is implemented. The proposed evaluation approach was used to evaluate 20 branches of the Sichuan Chuangang Gas Company. The results show that the method is applicable to the hierarchical design of SCADA-controlled gas infrastructure and can serve as reference for other gas companies in developing SCADA-controlled gas infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Wu & Hui, Longxuan & Lu, Yuting & Tang, Jinsong, 2020. "Developing an evaluation method for SCADA-Controlled urban gas infrastructure hierarchical design using multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:30:y:2020:i:c:s1874548220300391
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548220300391
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel (Jian) Sun & Shukai Chen & Chun Zhang & Suwan Shen, 2016. "A bus route evaluation model based on GIS and super-efficient data envelopment analysis," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 407-423, June.
    2. Kaya, Tolga & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2010. "Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2517-2527.
    3. Cynthia Changxin Wang & Samad M.E. Sepasgozar & Mudan Wang & Jun Sun & Xin Ning, 2019. "Green Performance Evaluation System for Energy-Efficiency-Based Planning for Construction Site Layout," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Ming-Tien Tsai & Hsueh-Liang Wu & Wen-Ko Liang, 2008. "Fuzzy Decision Making for Market Positioning and Developing Strategy for Improving Service Quality in Department Stores," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 303-319, June.
    5. Daniel (Jian) Sun & Lily Elefteriadou, 2014. "A Driver Behavior-Based Lane-Changing Model for Urban Arterial Streets," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 184-205, May.
    6. Wang, Zhiwei & Lei, Tingzhou & Chang, Xia & Shi, Xinguang & Xiao, Ju & Li, Zaifeng & He, Xiaofeng & Zhu, Jinling & Yang, Shuhua, 2015. "Optimization of a biomass briquette fuel system based on grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process: A study using cornstalks in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 523-532.
    7. Chengguang Lai & Xiaohong Chen & Xiaoyu Chen & Zhaoli Wang & Xushu Wu & Shiwei Zhao, 2015. "A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 1243-1259, June.
    8. Sánchez-Lozano, J.M. & García-Cascales, M.S. & Lamata, M.T., 2016. "GIS-based onshore wind farm site selection using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods. Evaluating the case of Southeastern Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 86-102.
    9. Stevan Djenadic & Dragan Ignjatovic & Milos Tanasijevic & Ugljesa Bugaric & Ivan Jankovic & Tomislav Subaranovic, 2019. "Development of the Availability Concept by Using Fuzzy Theory with AHP Correction, a Case Study: Bulldozers in the Open-Pit Lignite Mine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Kou, Gang & Ergu, Daji & Shang, Jennifer, 2014. "Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: Adapting Hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 261-271.
    11. Kabir, Golam & Sumi, Razia Sultana, 2014. "Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: A case study from Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 717-730.
    12. Yasir Ahmed Solangi & Qingmei Tan & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Ifzal Ahmed, 2018. "The Selection of Wind Power Project Location in the Southeastern Corridor of Pakistan: A Factor Analysis, AHP, and Fuzzy-TOPSIS Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, July.
    13. Chengxin Fan & Fengshan Dou & Baiming Tong & Zhiqiang Long, 2016. "Risk Analysis Based on AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation for Maglev Train Bogie," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-10, January.
    14. Awasthi, Anjali & Govindan, Kannan & Gold, Stefan, 2018. "Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 106-117.
    15. Saud Alshehri & Yacine Rezgui & Haijiang Li, 2015. "Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2221-2245, February.
    16. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linyi Zhou & Demi Zhu & Wei Shen, 2022. "Social Stability Risk Assessment of Disaster-Preventive Migration in Ethnic Minority Areas of Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Xi Lu & Jiaqing Lu & Xinzheng Yang & Xumei Chen, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Mobility via a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) Model with the IVIF-AHP and FCE Methods: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yıldız, Nurdan & Tüysüz, Fatih, 2019. "A hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach for strategic retail location investment: Application to Turkish food retailing," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    4. Caetani, Alberto Pavlick & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2016. "Development of an integrated decision-making method for an oil refinery restructuring in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 197-210.
    5. Xu, Jiuping & Song, Xiaoling & Wu, Yimin & Zeng, Ziqiang, 2015. "GIS-modelling based coal-fired power plant site identification and selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 520-539.
    6. Sánchez-Lozano, J.M. & García-Cascales, M.S. & Lamata, M.T., 2014. "Identification and selection of potential sites for onshore wind farms development in Region of Murcia, Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 311-324.
    7. Muhammad Ikram & Qingyu Zhang & Robert Sroufe, 2020. "Developing integrated management systems using an AHP‐Fuzzy VIKOR approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2265-2283, September.
    8. Paweł Ziemba, 2019. "Inter-Criteria Dependencies-Based Decision Support in the Sustainable wind Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-29, February.
    9. Shao, Meng & Zhao, Yuanxu & Sun, Jinwei & Han, Zhixin & Shao, Zhuxiao, 2023. "A decision framework for tidal current power plant site selection based on GIS-MCDM: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    10. Jamal, Taskin & Urmee, Tania & Shafiullah, G.M., 2020. "Planning of off-grid power supply systems in remote areas using multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Seddiki, Mohammed & Bennadji, Amar, 2019. "Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for electricity generation in a residential building," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 101-117.
    12. Fatemeh Mokhtariyan Sorkhan & Soheil Roumi & Mohammad Soltanzadeh Zarandi & Mohammad Ali Ashraf Ganjouei, 2024. "The Impact of Indoor Environmental Quality on Occupant Satisfaction in Commercial Buildings: A Comparison of Building Expert Opinions and Residents’ Experiences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Alicja Stoltmann, 2020. "Hybrid Multi-Criteria Method of Analyzing the Location of Distributed Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Zhao, Chengwei & Xu, Xuanhua & Liu, Ruihuan & He, Jishan, 2021. "A multi-aspect coordination HDRED site selection framework under multi-type heterogeneous environments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 833-848.
    15. Yudan Dou & Xiaolong Xue & Zebin Zhao & Xiaowei Luo & Ankang Ji & Ting Luo, 2018. "Multi-Index Evaluation for Flood Disaster from Sustainable Perspective: A Case Study of Xinjiang in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Wenjun Chen & Yanlei Zhu & Meng Yang & Jiahai Yuan, 2017. "Optimal Site Selection of Wind-Solar Complementary Power Generation Project for a Large-Scale Plug-In Charging Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Carnero, María Carmen & Gómez, Andrés, 2017. "Maintenance strategy selection in electric power distribution systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 255-272.
    18. Aragonés-Beltrán, Pablo & Chaparro-González, Fidel & Pastor-Ferrando, Juan-Pascual & Pla-Rubio, Andrea, 2014. "An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 222-238.
    19. Yasir Ahmed Solangi & Qingmei Tan & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Ifzal Ahmed, 2018. "The Selection of Wind Power Project Location in the Southeastern Corridor of Pakistan: A Factor Analysis, AHP, and Fuzzy-TOPSIS Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, July.
    20. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:30:y:2020:i:c:s1874548220300391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-critical-infrastructure-protection .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.