IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v52y2024ics1467089523000544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional theory in accounting information systems research: Shedding light on digital transformation and institutional change

Author

Listed:
  • Schiavi, Giovana Sordi
  • Behr, Ariel
  • Marcolin, Carla Bonato

Abstract

This article aims to shed light on digital transformation in the accounting sector from the perspective of institutional change. We performed a systematic literature review to understand how institutional change could be applied to research on Accounting Information Systems (AIS), using a quantitative method to categorize data through LSA (Latent Semantic Analysis) technique; and a qualitative method performed by hierarchical categorical content analysis as a basis for inferences. We reviewed 309 articles using Institutional Theory in accounting and AIS. The LSA results presented the main topics of study, subfields of research, and uses of Institutional Theory. Regarding accounting research, it is possible to identify the role of institutional forces in the IFRS adoption (in private and public sectors), XBRL adoption, and disclosure of information on organizations’ environmental, social, and governance, with a focus on analyses at the organizational level and regulatory pressures. A deep dive into AIS articles showed that Institutional Theory was applied to analyze the adoption of systems/technologies (mostly ERP and XBRL) through isomorphic processes (coercive, mimetic, and normative). We proposed to analyze digital technologies as an exogenous change for the digital transformation in accounting business using another perspective of Institutional Theory: institutional change. Institutional change analyzes the role of destabilizing elements in the change of an organizational field as a whole and not just in a few organizations. In this perspective, technology is the agent of change on a broader level, transforming organizations, individuals, customers, suppliers, and governments. The main contribution of this article is presenting suggestions for future AIS. This research agenda contributes to advancing Institutional Theory in AIS, using the lens of institutional change to analyze the new realities shaping accounting organizations, such as digital transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Schiavi, Giovana Sordi & Behr, Ariel & Marcolin, Carla Bonato, 2024. "Institutional theory in accounting information systems research: Shedding light on digital transformation and institutional change," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:52:y:2024:i:c:s1467089523000544
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089523000544
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozdil, Esin & Hoque, Zahirul, 2017. "Budgetary change at a university: A narrative inquiry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 316-328.
    2. Knudsen, Dan-Richard, 2020. "Elusive boundaries, power relations, and knowledge production: A systematic review of the literature on digitalization in accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    3. Patrícia S. Gomes & Maria José Fernandes & João Baptista Da Costa Carvalho, 2015. "The International Harmonization Process of Public Sector Accounting in Portugal: The Perspective of Different Stakeholders," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 268-281, March.
    4. Li, Teng & Belal, Ataur, 2018. "Authoritarian state, global expansion and corporate social responsibility reporting: The narrative of a Chinese state-owned enterprise," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 199-217.
    5. Chiu, Victoria & Liu, Qi & Muehlmann, Brigitte & Baldwin, Amelia Annette, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of accounting information systems journals and their emerging technologies contributions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 24-43.
    6. Guerreiro, Marta Silva & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima & Craig, Russell, 2012. "Voluntary adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by large unlisted companies in Portugal – Institutional logics and strategic responses," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 482-499.
    7. Kocsis, David, 2019. "A conceptual foundation of design and implementation research in accounting information systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Emilio Boulianne & Charles H. Cho, 2009. "The Rise And Fall Of Webtrust," Post-Print halshs-00459412, HAL.
    9. Boulianne, Emilio & Cho, Charles H., 2009. "The rise and fall of WebTrust," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 229-244.
    10. Indrit Troshani & Lee D. Parker & Andy Lymer, 2015. "Institutionalising XBRL for financial reporting: resorting to regulation," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 196-228, February.
    11. Luo, Le & Tang, Qingliang, 2016. "Determinants of the Quality of Corporate Carbon Management Systems: An International Study," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 275-305.
    12. Teng Li & Ataur Belal, 2018. "Authoritarian state, global expansion and corporate social responsibility reporting: The narrative of a Chinese state-owned enterprise," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 199-217, June.
    13. Ahmed Kouki, 2015. "Accounting valuation models under international financial reporting standards: evidence from some European listed companies," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 82-101.
    14. James Guthrie & Lee D. Parker, 2016. "Whither the accounting profession, accountants and accounting researchers? Commentary and projections," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(1), pages 2-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fábio Albuquerque & Paula Gomes Dos Santos, 2023. "Recent Trends in Accounting and Information System Research: A Literature Review Using Textual Analysis Tools," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Albanese, Massimo, 2023. "Reviewing literature through multidimensional representations," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Troshani, Indrit & Janssen, Marijn & Lymer, Andy & Parker, Lee D., 2018. "Digital transformation of business-to-government reporting: An institutional work perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-36.
    4. Mingyuan Guo & Yanfang Hu & Yu Zhang & Fuge Tian, 2019. "State-Owned Shareholding and CSR: Do Multiple Financing Methods Matter?—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    6. Li, Xinxiang & Soobaroyen, Teerooven, 2021. "Accounting, Ideological and Political Work and Chinese multinational operations: A neo-Gramscian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Yongfeng Zhang & Peng Wang & Jongwook Kwon, 2021. "CSR in China: Does Being Close to the Central or Local Government Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Aluchna, Maria & Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria & Jastrzębska, Ewa & Bohdanowicz, Leszek, 2023. "Sustainability reporting as a social construct : the systematic literature review within socio-political view," Other publications TiSEM 2b64bf0e-2d46-469f-b19e-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Qian, Wei & Parker, Lee & Zhu, Jingyu, 2024. "Corporate environmental reporting in the China context: The interplay of stakeholder salience, socialist ideology and state power," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    10. Gray, Glen L. & Chiu, Victoria & Liu, Qi & Li, Pei, 2014. "The expert systems life cycle in AIS research: What does it mean for future AIS research?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 423-451.
    11. Vikrant Shirodkar & Namita Shete, 2021. "The Impact of Domestic CSR on the Internationalisation of Emerging-Market Multinational Enterprises: Evidence from India," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 799-829, December.
    12. Mihaela-Maria Barnes, 2019. "State-Owned Entities as Key Actors in the Promotion and Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Examples of Good Practices," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, April.
    13. Pizzi, Simone & Venturelli, Andrea & Variale, Michele & Macario, Giuseppe Pio, 2021. "Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Grégory Jemine & François-Régis Puyou & Florence Bouvet, 2024. "Technological innovation and the co-production of accounting services in small accounting firms," Post-Print hal-04325739, HAL.
    15. Cannizzaro, Anthony P. & Weiner, Robert J., 2015. "Multinational investment and voluntary disclosure: Project-level evidence from the petroleum industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 32-47.
    16. Nusirat Ojuolape Gold & Fauziah Md. Taib & Yaxin Ma, 2022. "Firm-Level Attributes, Industry-Specific Factors, Stakeholder Pressure, and Country-Level Attributes: Global Evidence of What Inspires Corporate Sustainability Practices and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    18. Turcan Cristian Dragos & Sabin-Alexandru Babeanu & Rapan Claudia Mihaela & Banta Viorel Costin, 2023. "Obstacles And Solutions In Accounting During The Pandemic Era," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 219-225, February.
    19. Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Delia Deliu, 2021. "Big Data’s Disruptive Effect on Job Profiles: Management Accountants’ Case Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Adrian GROȘANU & Melinda-Timea FÜLÖP & Nicolae MĂGDAȘ, 2024. "Ethical Dilemmas in Digital Accounting: A Comprehensive Literature Review," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(4), pages 56-67, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:52:y:2024:i:c:s1467089523000544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.