IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v45y2015i2p196-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalising XBRL for financial reporting: resorting to regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Indrit Troshani
  • Lee D. Parker
  • Andy Lymer

Abstract

By integrating and streamlining financial information within and among various organisations, eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) has been developed with a view to enhancing the efficiency, accuracy, and transparency of corporate accounting information. Taking an inter-organisational focus, this paper investigates the process of how XBRL was institutionalised. It explains and offers insights on how institutional arrangements emerge and become relevant as heterogeneous organisations consider adopting accounting innovations while evidence concerning their benefits is unavailable. The original and overall contribution of this study is that it improves current understanding of coal-face actors' perceptions, behaviours, and strategies as they interact in the organisational field and become engaged in developing accounting innovations to produce the macro-level observations documented in existing institutional theory studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Indrit Troshani & Lee D. Parker & Andy Lymer, 2015. "Institutionalising XBRL for financial reporting: resorting to regulation," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 196-228, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:45:y:2015:i:2:p:196-228
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2014.980772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2014.980772
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2014.980772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    2. Gostimir Dejan, 2015. "XBRL Standard for Financial Reporting in Croatia: Current State and Perspectives," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 31-40, September.
    3. van de Kaa, Geerten & Janssen, Marijn & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Standards battles for business-to-government data exchange: Identifying success factors for standard dominance using the Best Worst Method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 182-189.
    4. Schiavi, Giovana Sordi & Behr, Ariel & Marcolin, Carla Bonato, 2024. "Institutional theory in accounting information systems research: Shedding light on digital transformation and institutional change," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    5. Valentinetti, Diego & Flores Muñoz, Francisco, 2021. "Internet of things: Emerging impacts on digital reporting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 549-562.
    6. Atanasov, Atanas, 2022. "Digitalization Of The Corporate Reporting In Europe - Evidence From Bulgarian Wood Based Industry," MPRA Paper 114372, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Troshani, Indrit & Janssen, Marijn & Lymer, Andy & Parker, Lee D., 2018. "Digital transformation of business-to-government reporting: An institutional work perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-36.
    8. Rowbottom, N. & Locke, J. & Troshani, I., 2021. "When the tail wags the dog? Digitalisation and corporate reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Alkhatib, Esra'a & Ojala, Hannu & Collis, Jill, 2019. "Determinants of the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies to Companies House: Evidence from the UK," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:45:y:2015:i:2:p:196-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.