IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v22y2016icp60-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated”—Artificial intelligence research in accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Sutton, Steve G.
  • Holt, Matthew
  • Arnold, Vicky

Abstract

Gray et al. (2014) examined the productivity of expert systems/artificial intelligence research in accounting and came to the conclusion that both research on and practice use of expert systems/artificial intelligence had waned since the late 1990s. In our study, we reconsider these findings based on a broader view that is ‘artificial intelligence’ centric versus ‘expert systems’ centric. The results show that while there was a bit of a lull in the late 1990s, artificial intelligence research in accounting has continued to steadily increase over the past 30years. Further consideration of artificial intelligence techniques as embedded modules in integrated audit support systems also suggest that use by practice continues to be robust. Based on these findings, we make a call for much more research on the usability, and use, of artificial intelligence techniques in accounting domains. Contrary to earlier perceptions, the research domain remains vibrant and holds great potential for AIS researchers to take a leadership role in advancing the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Sutton, Steve G. & Holt, Matthew & Arnold, Vicky, 2016. "“The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated”—Artificial intelligence research in accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 60-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:22:y:2016:i:c:p:60-73
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2016.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089516300823
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O'Leary, Daniel E., 2008. "Gartner's hype cycle and information system research issues," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 240-252.
    2. Daniel E. O'Leary & Paul R. Watkins, 1992. "Integration of Intelligent Systems and Conventional Systems: Requirements for Co‐ordinating Multiple Agents for Diagnostic Decisions," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(2), pages 135-145, May.
    3. Alles, Michael G. & Kogan, Alexander & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2008. "Exploiting comparative advantage: A paradigm for value added research in accounting information systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 202-215.
    4. Daniel E. O'Leary, 2007. "Knowledge representation of rules: a note," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1‐2), pages 73-84, January.
    5. Carlin Dowling & Stewart a. Leech, 2014. "A Big 4 Firm's Use of Information Technology to Control the Audit Process: How an Audit Support System is Changing Auditor Behavior," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 230-252, March.
    6. Gray, Glen L. & Chiu, Victoria & Liu, Qi & Li, Pei, 2014. "The expert systems life cycle in AIS research: What does it mean for future AIS research?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 423-451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravi Seethamraju & Angela Hecimovic, 2023. "Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 780-800, November.
    2. Alles, Michael, 2018. "Examining the role of the AIS research literature using the natural experiment of the 2018 JIS conference on cloud computing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 58-74.
    3. Gray, Glen L. & Chiu, Victoria & Liu, Qi & Li, Pei, 2014. "The expert systems life cycle in AIS research: What does it mean for future AIS research?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 423-451.
    4. Vicky Arnold, 2018. "The changing technological environment and the future of behavioural research in accounting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 315-339, June.
    5. Mahdi Salehi, 2011. "A study of the barriers of implementation of accounting information system: Case of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 2(2), pages 76-85.
    6. Koreff, Jared & Weisner, Martin & Sutton, Steve G., 2021. "Data analytics (ab) use in healthcare fraud audits," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    7. Efrim Boritz, J. & Hayes, Louise & Timoshenko, Lev M., 2020. "How understandable are SOX 404 auditors reports?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    8. Federica De Santis, 2018. "Big Data e revisione contabile: uno studio esplorativo nel contesto italiano," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 129-154.
    9. Desai, Vikram & Bucaro, Anthony C. & Kim, Joung W. & Srivastava, Rajendra & Desai, Renu, 2023. "Toward a better expert system for auditor going concern opinions using Bayesian network inflation factors," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    10. Hoffman, Benjamin W. & Sellers, R. Drew & Skomra, Justyna, 2018. "The impact of client information technology capability on audit pricing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 59-75.
    11. Bisbe, Josep & Kruis, Anne-Marie & Madini, Paola, 2019. "Coercive, enabling, diagnostic, and interactive control: Untangling the threads of their connections," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 124-144.
    12. Chiu, Victoria & Liu, Qi & Muehlmann, Brigitte & Baldwin, Amelia Annette, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of accounting information systems journals and their emerging technologies contributions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 24-43.
    13. Mahama, Habib & Elbashir, Mohamed Z. & Sutton, Steve G. & Arnold, Vicky, 2016. "A further interpretation of the relational agency of information systems: A research note," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 16-25.
    14. Paula M. G. Veen-Dirks & Marijke C. Leliveld & Wesley Kaufmann, 2021. "The effect of enabling versus coercive performance measurement systems on procedural fairness and red tape," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 269-294, June.
    15. Yigitbasioglu, Ogan M., 2015. "External auditors' perceptions of cloud computing adoption in Australia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 46-62.
    16. Liew, Angela, 2019. "Enhancing and enabling management control systems through information technology: The essential roles of internal transparency and global transparency," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 16-31.
    17. Alles, Michael, 2020. "Using the 2019 JBE conference and 2017 JIS themed issue as natural experiments to examine the role of editors as gatekeepers of the research literature in AIS and ethics," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    18. Huh, Bong Gu & Lee, Sunhwa & Kim, Wonsin, 2021. "The impact of the input level of information system audit on the audit quality: Korean evidence," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    19. Guan, Jian & Levitan, Alan S. & Kuhn, John R., 2013. "How AIS can progress along with ontology research in IS," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 21-38.
    20. Krieger, Felix & Drews, Paul & Velte, Patrick, 2021. "Explaining the (non-) adoption of advanced data analytics in auditing: A process theory," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:22:y:2016:i:c:p:60-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.