IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v4y1995i3p355-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National ideology, public policy, and the business environment: A contingency approach to economic reform in Hungary, Poland and Eastern Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Brouthers, Lance Eliot
  • Lamb, Charles W.

Abstract

This paper proposes a contingency approach to economic reform in former Eastern bloc countries. In contrast to the standard view suggesting that market economies are the only viable alternative to command economies, this paper presents three alternative models of capitalism and offers a contingency approach to economic reform. The contingency view suggests that Eastern European countries should adopt the capitalist economy type that (1) best matches their capital and labor market structures; (2) is most consistent with their national history; and (3) best matches their economic development goals. Hungary and Poland are used to illustrate the efficacy of the proposed contingency framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Brouthers, Lance Eliot & Lamb, Charles W., 1995. "National ideology, public policy, and the business environment: A contingency approach to economic reform in Hungary, Poland and Eastern Europe," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 355-372, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:4:y:1995:i:3:p:355-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/096959319500014Q
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sachs, J.D., 1991. "Accelerating Privatizatiob in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland," Research Paper 92, World Institute for Development Economics Research.
    2. Sachs, Jeffrey D, 1992. "Privatization in Russia: Some Lessons from Eastern Europe," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 43-48, May.
    3. Toyohiro Kono, 1984. "Strategy and Structure of Japanese Enterprises," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-17627-4.
    4. Domanski, Tomasz, 1992. "Development of small private companies and their marketing activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 57-65, January.
    5. Fischer, Stanley & Frenkel, Jacob, 1992. "Macroeconomic Issues of Soviet Reform," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 37-42, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gil, Adrian & Nakos, George & Brouthers, Lance Eliot & Brouthers, Keith D., 2006. "Country-specific strategy and new venture formation in Central and East Europe," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klasen, Stephan., 1993. "Gender inequality and development strategies: lessons from the past and policy issues for the future," ILO Working Papers 992987383402676, International Labour Organization.
    2. Jan Svejnar, 2002. "Assistance to the Transition Economies : Were There Alternatives?," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 20232.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:298738 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Pavel Ciaian & Ján Pokrivčák & Dušan Drabik, 2008. "Prečo sú niektoré sektory v tranzitívnych ekonomikách menej reformované ako ostatné? prípad výskumu a vzdelávania v oblasti ekonómie [Why some sectors of transition economies are less reformed than," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(6), pages 819-836.
    5. R. Daviddi, 1994. "Privatisation in the transition to a market economy," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 47(191), pages 399-429.
    6. Zou, Heng-fu, 1994. "On the dynamics of privatization," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 221-233.
    7. Hingorani, Archana & Lehn, Kenneth & Makhija, Anil K., 1997. "Investor behavior in mass privatization: The case of the Czech voucher scheme," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 349-396, June.
    8. William N. Trumbull, 1992. "Neither Socialism nor Capitalism: The Emergence of a New Economic System in the Former Soviet Union," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 307-315, December.
    9. Park, Namgyoo K. & Cho, Dong-Sung, 1997. "The effect of strategic alliance on performance," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 155-164.
    10. Justin Yifu Lin, 2007. "Development and Transition : Idea, Strategy, and Viability," Development Economics Working Papers 22709, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    11. Raiser, Martin, 1992. "Soft budget constraints: An institutional interpretation of stylised facts in economic transformation in Central Eastern Europe," Kiel Working Papers 549, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. John Marangos, 2005. "A Political Economy Approach to the Neoclassical Gradualist Model of Transition," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 263-293, April.
    13. Ernesto Sepúlveda & Germán Coloma & Ana María Gómez & Rossana Corona & Juan Pablo Trujillo & Lino Jaramillo & Pablo Gerchunoff & Luis Alberto Zuleta & Gustavo Adolfo Ramírez & Dominique Hachette & Gui, 1993. "Privatization in Latin America," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 44638 edited by Rossana Corona & Manuel Sánchez, February.
    14. Bluhm, Richard & Szirmai, Adam, 2012. "Institutions and long-run growth performance: An analytic literature review of the institutional determinants of economic growth," MERIT Working Papers 2012-033, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Can Erutku & Luc Vallée, 1997. "Business start-ups in today's Poland:who and how?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 113-126, January.
    16. Hideshi Itoh, 2003. "Corporate Restructuring in Japan Part I: Can M‐Form Organization Manage Diverse Businesses?," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 54(1), pages 49-73, March.
    17. Wladimir Andreff, 2003. "Le gouvernement d’entreprise à l’Est : vers un modèle de contrôle centre-européen ?," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 72(3), pages 173-199.
    18. Pierfederico Asdrubali & Simone Tedeschi & Luigi Ventura, 2020. "Household risk‐sharing channels," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(3), pages 1109-1142, July.
    19. Simeon Djankov & Owen Hauck, 2016. "The Divergent Postcommunist Paths to Democracy and Economic Freedom," Working Paper Series WP16-10, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    20. Pasquale Tridico, "undated". "The Enlargement Of The European Union To Eastern Europe: Ten Years After," Working Papers 0011, ASTRIL - Associazione Studi e Ricerche Interdisciplinari sul Lavoro.
    21. Faruk Balli & Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan & Bent E. Sørensen, 2012. "Risk sharing through capital gains," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 472-492, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:4:y:1995:i:3:p:355-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.