IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v61y2002i1p111-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a community-level health policy intervention

Author

Listed:
  • von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
  • Joksimovic, Ljiljana
  • Badura, Bernhard
  • Siegrist, Johannes

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • von dem Knesebeck, Olaf & Joksimovic, Ljiljana & Badura, Bernhard & Siegrist, Johannes, 2002. "Evaluation of a community-level health policy intervention," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 111-122, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:61:y:2002:i:1:p:111-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(01)00221-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grielen, Saskia J. & Boerma, Wienke G. W. & Groenewegen, Peter P., 2000. "Science in practice: can health care reform projects in central and eastern Europe be evaluated systematically?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 73-89, September.
    2. Jennifer Greene & Charles McClintock, 1985. "Triangulation in Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 9(5), pages 523-545, October.
    3. Carol H. Weiss, 1997. "How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 501-524, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hart, Diane & Paucar-Caceres, Alberto, 2017. "A utilisation focussed and viable systems approach for evaluating technology supported learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 626-641.
    2. Simic, Snezana & Milicevic, Milena Santric & Matejic, Bojana & Marinkovic, Jelena & Adams, Orvill, 2010. "Do we have primary health care reform? The story of the Republic of Serbia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 160-169, July.
    3. Goldberg, Jessica & Bumgarner, Erin & Jacobs, Francine, 2016. "Measuring program- and individual-level fidelity in a home visiting program for adolescent parents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 163-173.
    4. Harman, Elena & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "Towards program theory validation: Crowdsourcing the qualitative analysis of participant experiences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 183-194.
    5. Groenewegen, Peter P. & Dourgnon, Paul & Greß, Stefan & Jurgutis, Arnoldas & Willems, Sara, 2013. "Strengthening weak primary care systems: Steps towards stronger primary care in selected Western and Eastern European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 170-179.
    6. Florio, Massimo & Graeme, Brad & Astbury, Philip & Armstrong, Harvey W. & Audretsch, David B. & Dermastia, Mateja & Picciotto, Robert & Delponte, Laura & Rampton, James & Sartori, Davide & Vignetti, S, 2016. "Support to SMEs - Increasing research and innovation in SMEs and SME development. Final report. Work package 2," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 141310.
    7. Rob Tulder & M. May Seitanidi & Andrew Crane & Stephen Brammer, 2016. "Enhancing the Impact of Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Khembo, Felix & Chapman, Sarah, 2017. "A formative evaluation of the recovery public works programme in Blantyre City, Malawi," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 8-21.
    9. Peterson, Christina & Skolits, Gary, 2019. "Evaluating unintended program outcomes through Ripple Effects Mapping (REM): Application of REM using grounded theory," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Helitzer, Deborah L. & Sussman, Andrew L. & Hoffman, Richard M. & Getrich, Christina M. & Warner, Teddy D. & Rhyne, Robert L., 2014. "Along the way to developing a theory of the program: A re-examination of the conceptual framework as an organizing strategy," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 157-163.
    11. Harris, Kevin & Adams, Andrew, 2016. "Power and discourse in the politics of evidence in sport for development," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 97-106.
    12. Fred Coalter, 2017. "Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 141-149.
    13. Nogueira-Jr, Cassimiro & Padoveze, Maria Clara, 2018. "Public policies on healthcare associated infections: A case study of three countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(9), pages 991-1000.
    14. Jabeen, Sumera, 2016. "Do we really care about unintended outcomes? An analysis of evaluation theory and practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 144-154.
    15. Fred Coalter, 2015. "Sport-for-Change: Some Thoughts from a Sceptic," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 19-23.
    16. Ofek, Yuval, 2017. "Evaluating social exclusion interventions in university-community partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 46-55.
    17. Jabeen, Sumera, 2018. "Unintended outcomes evaluation approach: A plausible way to evaluate unintended outcomes of social development programmes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 262-274.
    18. Armstrong, Natalie & Brewster, Liz & Tarrant, Carolyn & Dixon, Ruth & Willars, Janet & Power, Maxine & Dixon-Woods, Mary, 2018. "Taking the heat or taking the temperature? A qualitative study of a large-scale exercise in seeking to measure for improvement, not blame," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 157-164.
    19. Massimo FLORIO & Aleksandra PARTEKA & Emanuela SIRTORI, 2016. "The Role of EU Policy in Supporting Technological Innovation in SMEs - a Bayesian Network Analysis of Firm-Level Data from Poland," Departmental Working Papers 2016-13, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    20. Kersnik, Janko, 2001. "Determinants of customer satisfaction with the health care system, with the possibility to choose a personal physician and with a family doctor in a transition country," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 155-164, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:61:y:2002:i:1:p:111-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.