IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v87y2018icp85-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding motivations for violation of timber harvesting regulation: The case of chainsaw operators in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Boakye, Joseph

Abstract

Despite regulations introduced about two decades ago to prohibit the use of chainsaw machines for milling logs into lumber for commercial purposes in Ghana, the practice still persists in clear violation of the law. This empirical case study in the Ashanti Region of Ghana seeks to understand the motivations for such violation. The study finds that low deterrence, economic gains to be derived, high patronage of chainsaw milled lumber on the domestic and the West African sub-regional markets, apparent lack of social sanctions for violators, weak morals of the actors involved, perceived unreasonableness of the regulations that prohibit chainsaw milling and low legitimacy of the regulators have all contributed to the violation behaviour. It also highlights the importance of contextual factors particularly poverty and political support in shaping the violation behaviour. The implications of these findings for policy are discussed and recommendations put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Boakye, Joseph, 2018. "Understanding motivations for violation of timber harvesting regulation: The case of chainsaw operators in Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 85-92.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:85-92
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934117302915
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afriyie, Kwadwo & Abass, Kabila, 2020. "Profiting from illegality: A discursive analysis of the chainsaw operation in rural Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Tegegne, Yitagesu Tekle & Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta & Kotilainen, Juha & Winkel, Georg & Haywood, Andrew & Almaw, Addisu, 2022. "What drives forest rule compliance behaviour in the Congo Basin? A study of local communities in Cameroon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Seyram K. Loh & Kwabena O. Asubonteng & Selase K. Adanu, 2022. "Effects of Monocropping on Land Cover Transitions in the Wet Evergreen Agro-Ecological Zone of Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Aydin Teymourifar & Maria A. M. Trindade, 2023. "A Framework to Design and Evaluate Green Contract Mechanisms for Forestry Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Boakye, Joseph, 2020. "Enforcement of logging regulations in Ghana: Perspectives of frontline regulatory officers," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Acheampong, Emmanuel & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2020. "Avoiding legality: Timber producers’ strategies and motivations under FLEGT in Ghana and Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:85-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.