IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v24y2012icp29-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate change adaptive capacity of the Canadian forest sector

Author

Listed:
  • Johnston, Mark
  • Hesseln, Hayley

Abstract

Canada's forests will be affected by climate change to a greater degree than many other regions. The ability of the Canadian forest sector to successfully adapt to climate change, i.e. its adaptive capacity, was assessed through a series of group discussions and interviews with a variety of forestry stakeholders across Canada. The assessment was oriented to the following determinants of adaptive capacity: 1) The range of available technological options for adaptation that would be considered in response to a perceived climate-related stress; 2) The availability of resources; 3) The structure and functionality of critical institutions to understand the allocation of decision‐making authority, institutional flexibility, and the decision criteria that would be employed; 4) Human and social capital, including the distribution of educational achievement, differential access to personal security and robust property rights; 5) The system's (and individuals’) access to risk-spreading processes (both formal and informal); 6) Decision-makers’ ability to manage information, the processes by which these decision-makers determine which information is credible, and the credibility of the decision-makers themselves. Forest managers were generally optimistic about their ability to identify and implement adaptation options at the forest management unit level. However, institutional barriers were seen to be a major impediment; managers identified tenure reform and a more flexible regulatory environment as essential for the innovation that will be required by climate change. Other factors limiting adaptive capacity include lack of financial resources and low levels of investment in the forest sector, lack of specialized science capacity in climate change impacts and the long-term nature of planning required by long-lived forest species. Several non-governmental institutions may support increased adaptive capacity including forest certification systems, Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management, Canada's model forest program and others. However, these institutions will need to be modified in order to support forest managers in planning for climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnston, Mark & Hesseln, Hayley, 2012. "Climate change adaptive capacity of the Canadian forest sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 29-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:24:y:2012:i:c:p:29-34
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934112001256
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Girardin, Martin P. & Raulier, Frédéric & Bernier, Pierre Y. & Tardif, Jacques C., 2008. "Response of tree growth to a changing climate in boreal central Canada: A comparison of empirical, process-based, and hybrid modelling approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 209-228.
    2. Susanne Moser & Roger Kasperson & Gary Yohe & Julian Agyeman, 2008. "Adaptation to climate change in the Northeast United States: opportunities, processes, constraints," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 643-659, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bone, Christopher, 2016. "A complex adaptive systems perspective of forest policy in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 138-144.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gallaher, Adam & Graziano, Marcello & Fiaschetti, Maurizio, 2021. "Legacy and shockwaves: A spatial analysis of strengthening resilience of the power grid in Connecticut," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Maaz Gardezi & J. Gordon Arbuckle, 2019. "Spatially Representing Vulnerability to Extreme Rain Events Using Midwestern Farmers’ Objective and Perceived Attributes of Adaptive Capacity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 17-34, January.
    3. Steven DiFalco & Anita T. Morzillo, 2021. "Comparison of Attitudes towards Roadside Vegetation Management across an Exurban Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf & Katharine Neill & Burton St John III & Ivan K Ash & Kaitrin Mahar, 2016. "The sea is rising… but not onto the policy agenda: A multiple streams approach to understanding sea level rise policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(2), pages 228-243, March.
    5. David Lobell & Angela Torney & Christopher Field, 2011. "Climate extremes in California agriculture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 355-363, December.
    6. Ana Márquez & Raimundo Real & Jesús Olivero & Alba Estrada, 2011. "Combining climate with other influential factors for modelling the impact of climate change on species distribution," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 135-157, September.
    7. Stratton, Tana & Price, David T. & Gajewski, Konrad, 2011. "Impacts of daily weather variability on simulations of the Canadian boreal forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3250-3260.
    8. Philip Camill & Maryellen Hearn & Krista Bahm & Eileen Johnson, 2012. "Using a boundary organization approach to develop a sea level rise and storm surge impact analysis framework for coastal communities in Maine," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 111-130, June.
    9. Paschen, Jana-Axinja & Ison, Ray, 2014. "Narrative research in climate change adaptation—Exploring a complementary paradigm for research and governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1083-1092.
    10. Liu, Jinxun & Vogelmann, James E. & Zhu, Zhiliang & Key, Carl H. & Sleeter, Benjamin M. & Price, David T. & Chen, Jing M. & Cochrane, Mark A. & Eidenshink, Jeffery C. & Howard, Stephen M. & Bliss, Nor, 2011. "Estimating California ecosystem carbon change using process model and land cover disturbance data: 1951–2000," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2333-2341.
    11. Jeremy Martinich & James Neumann & Lindsay Ludwig & Lesley Jantarasami, 2013. "Risks of sea level rise to disadvantaged communities in the United States," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 169-185, February.
    12. Zhen-Ming Ge & Seppo Kellomäki & Heli Peltola & Xiao Zhou & Hannu Väisänen, 2013. "Adaptive management to climate change for Norway spruce forests along a regional gradient in Finland," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 275-289, May.
    13. Anyomi, Kenneth A. & Raulier, Frédéric & Mailly, Daniel & Girardin, Martin P. & Bergeron, Yves, 2012. "Using height growth to model local and regional response of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) to climate within the boreal forest of western Québec," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 123-132.
    14. G. Biesbroek & Catrien Termeer & Judith Klostermann & Pavel Kabat, 2014. "Analytical lenses on barriers in the governance of climate change adaptation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(7), pages 1011-1032, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:24:y:2012:i:c:p:29-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.