IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v164y2024ics1389934124001011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food ethnobotany of forest resource in the high-altitude Himalaya Mountains: Enhancing the food sovereignty of ethnic groups

Author

Listed:
  • Haq, Shiekh Marifatul
  • Khoja, Aadil Abdullah
  • Waheed, Muhammad
  • Siddiqui, Manzer H.
  • Alamri, Saud
  • Alfagham, Alanoud T.
  • AL-Humaid, Latifah A.
  • Bussmann, Rainer W.

Abstract

The vital knowledge of traditional foraging techniques used in indigenous peoples' cuisines may be preserved through gastronomical field studies before it is lost forever. Certain plants are appreciated for their gastronomic, social, economic and ecological importance in the High Himalaya because they play such a significant role in the daily life of the local indigenous populations. To determine the plant cultural indicators for each ethnic group, the data were analyzed using an indicator species analysis. Semi-structured interviews of 167 participants, focus group discussion, and field observations were used to gather information from February 2019 to August 2022 for a comprehensive and systematic gastronomical survey. Across four ethnic groups, a total of (N = 99) wild edible plant species and (N = 9) fungi species from 38 families were documented. Tender leaves were the most commonly used, while tubers were the least commonly used. The majority of the species reported were used as vegetables, followed by species used as fruits and herbal tea. For the first time, we examined cross-cultural similarity and dissimilarity for gastronomic usage: vegetables and savoring plants,fruits, and herbal tea across the cultures studied from the perspective of food ethnobotany. We discovered a clear difference in how different cultures used forest resources, with Gujjar and Pahari showing the most species similarity. This is because these ethic groups are culturally linked with one another and share a common social structure, geography, and language. We calculated plant cultural markers for each species, and 19 of them had significant p-values among the four ethnic groups. The findings revealed a positive relationship between the Gujjar and Pahari ethnic groups and the gastronomical indicator values, while the Kashmiri ethnic group had a negative relationship. The Kashmiri ethnic group experienced the loss of traditional knowledge because of the economic transition that caused people to prefer purchasing vegetables from the market rather than foraging for them in the wild. Traditional knowledge was also dwindling between the Gujjar and Pahari ethnic groups because of social changes brought on by developmental activities that changed their way of life. The identified plant cultural markers were significant to local residents and frequently had adaptations to extremely harsh climatic and environmental conditions. Our finding that 47% of species had market value suggests that these species have a sizable market demand and a promising economic value. They have the potential to boost food security, local community sovereignty, and people's living standards. Food production systems may become more resilient and sustainable by incorporating these indicator species into conventional agriculture. The current study raises awareness about forest resources and enables ethnic groups to live in a natural environment without food scarcity.

Suggested Citation

  • Haq, Shiekh Marifatul & Khoja, Aadil Abdullah & Waheed, Muhammad & Siddiqui, Manzer H. & Alamri, Saud & Alfagham, Alanoud T. & AL-Humaid, Latifah A. & Bussmann, Rainer W., 2024. "Food ethnobotany of forest resource in the high-altitude Himalaya Mountains: Enhancing the food sovereignty of ethnic groups," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:164:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001011
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124001011
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sayamol Charoenratana & Cholnapa Anukul & Peter M. Rosset, 2021. "Food Sovereignty and Food Security: Livelihood Strategies Pursued by Farmers during the Maize Monoculture Boom in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Muhammad Abdul Aziz & Zahid Ullah & Andrea Pieroni, 2020. "Wild Food Plant Gathering among Kalasha, Yidgha, Nuristani and Khowar Speakers in Chitral, NW Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Shabir Ijaz & Anjum Perveen & Saima Ashraf & Asia Bibi & Yunus Dogan, 2021. "Indigenous wild plants and fungi traditionally used in folk medicine and functional food in District Neelum Azad Kashmir," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8307-8330, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Abdul Aziz, 2022. "Documenting Local Food Knowledge at Hindukush: Challenges and Opportunities," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Eduardo Estrada-Castillón & José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla & Luis Gerardo Cuéllar-Rodríguez & Martí March-Salas & Juan Antonio Encina-Domínguez & Wibke Himmeslbach & María Magdalena Salinas-Rodrígu, 2022. "Ethnobotany in Iturbide, Nuevo León: The Traditional Knowledge on Plants Used in the Semiarid Mountains of Northeastern Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-43, October.
    3. Beaulieu, Antoine & Leblond, Jean-Philippe & Déry, Steve & Cao, Huhua, 2023. "Urban air pollution anxieties, forest conservation, and farmland expropriation: State territorialization in the uplands and highlands of northern Thailand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Simon Høegmark & Tonny Elmose Andersen & Patrik Grahn & Anna Mejldal & Kirsten K. Roessler, 2021. "The Wildman Programme—Rehabilitation and Reconnection with Nature for Men with Mental or Physical Health Problems—A Matched-Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Muhammad Ibrahim & Naveed Akhtar & Abdul Wahab & Abdulwahed Fahad Alrefaei & Mikhlid H. Almutairi, 2023. "Exploring Wild Edible Plants in Malakand, Pakistan: Ethnobotanical and Nutritional Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:164:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.