IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v62y2024ipbs1544612324002368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judicial independence and growth investors' decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Panpan
  • Li, Zhen
  • Zhuang, Ziyin
  • Lin, Boyuan

Abstract

Using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2016, we consider the establishment of China's National Circuit Courts as a quasi-natural experiment and empirically investigate the impact of judicial independence on the decisions of growth investors using the difference-in-difference (DID) method. Our findings suggest that judicial independence significantly facilitates growth investors' investment in local firms. This effect mainly stems from the reduction of business risks and the promotion of corporate innovation. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that judicial independence has a stronger promoting effect on growth investors' investment in firms in high-tech, high-growth, and poor initial legal environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Panpan & Li, Zhen & Zhuang, Ziyin & Lin, Boyuan, 2024. "Judicial independence and growth investors' decisions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:62:y:2024:i:pb:s1544612324002368
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612324002368
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastien Betermier & Laurent E. Calvet & Paolo Sodini, 2017. "Who Are the Value and Growth Investors?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(1), pages 5-46, February.
    2. Li, Zhen & Zheng, Panpan & Xie, Huobao, 2024. "Judicial digital intellectualization and corporate online misconduct," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    3. James S. Ang & Yingmei Cheng & Chaopeng Wu, 2014. "Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China? Evidence from Financing and Investment Choices in the High-Tech Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(2), pages 332-348, May.
    4. Cronqvist, Henrik & Siegel, Stephan & Yu, Frank, 2015. "Value versus growth investing: Why do different investors have different styles?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 333-349.
    5. La Porta, Rafael & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 1997. "Legal Determinants of External Finance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(3), pages 1131-1150, July.
    6. Zhao, Da & Yu, Ao & Guo, Jingyuan, 2022. "Judicial institutions, local protection and market segmentation: Evidence from the establishment of interprovincial circuit tribunals in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Long, Cheryl Xiaoning & Wang, Jun, 2015. "Judicial local protectionism in China: An empirical study of IP cases," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 48-59.
    8. Yujuan Zhang & Lu Zhang, 2022. "Innovation Input on Enterprise Value: Based on the Moderating Effect of Ownership Structure," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1078-1088, March.
    9. Kose John & Lubomir Litov & Bernard Yeung, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Risk‐Taking," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1679-1728, August.
    10. Xue, Xizi & Yang, Hao & Yang, Xuan & Zhang, Jiahao & Zhao, Xiaofang & Wang, Yihui, 2023. "Judicial independence and corporate employment: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    11. Yang, Laifeng & Wang, Qing Sophie & Lai, Shaojie, 2023. "Fair and square: The impact of judicial independence on entrepreneurship," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    12. Wang, Kedi & Wu, Chen, 2023. "Financial-judicial specialization and corporate misconduct: Evidence from the establishment of the Shanghai Financial Court," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    13. Jordan, Bradford D. & Kim, Soohyung & Liu, Mark H., 2016. "Growth opportunities, short-term market pressure, and dual-class share structure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 304-328.
    14. Lily H. Fang & Josh Lerner & Chaopeng Wu, 2017. "Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Ownership, and Innovation: Evidence from China," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(7), pages 2446-2477.
    15. Lai, Shaojie & Yang, Laifeng & Wang, Qing & Anderson, Hamish D., 2023. "Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    16. Wen, Jinglei & Deng, Yujiao, 2023. "How does intellectual property protection contribute to the digital transformation of enterprises?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    17. Hirschey, Mark & Richardson, Vernon J., 2001. "Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 65-82, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Aimin, 2024. "Judicial local protection and corporate litigation outcomes: A study based on legal big data," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yurou, 2023. "Judicial independence and crash risk: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Wang, Kedi & Wu, Chen, 2024. "Financial-judicial specialization and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Zheng, Panpan & Li, Zhen & Zhuang, Ziyin, 2023. "The impact of judicial protection of intellectual property on digital innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    4. Zhang, Yufei & Wang, Li & He, Tengjiao, 2024. "Can IP tribunals increase firm patent applications?—Empirical evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Li, Zhen & Zheng, Panpan & Xie, Huobao, 2024. "Judicial digital intellectualization and corporate online misconduct," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    6. Lai, Shaojie & Yang, Laifeng & Wang, Qing & Anderson, Hamish D., 2023. "Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Xiao, Yangao & Han, Nianchen & Li, Rui & Ran, Huaqing & Zhou, Shihao & Tong, Tony W., 2024. "Trademarks and firm market value: Evidence from new trademark-firm linked data in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    8. Luo, Lianfa & Cheng, Zhiming & Ye, Qingqing & Cheng, Yanjun & Smyth, Russell & Yang, Zhiqing & Zhang, Le, 2024. "Nonmonetary awards and innovation: Evidence from winning China's Top Brand Contest," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Fang, Yiwei & Fornaro, James & Li, Lingxiang & Zhu, Yun, 2018. "The impact of accounting laws and standards on bank risks: Evidence from transition countries," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 103-118.
    10. Danlin Shen & Carl R. Chen & Xinyan Yan & Zhihong Yi, 2022. "Do credit market accessibility and legal protection shape corporate innovation?," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(3), pages 719-754, September.
    11. Bai, Min & Shen, Luxi & Li, Yue & Yu, Chia-Feng (Jeffrey), 2024. "Does legal justice promote stakeholder justice? Evidence from a judicial reform in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Mohsni, Sana & Otchere, Isaac, 2014. "Risk taking behavior of privatized banks," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 122-142.
    13. Li, Aimin, 2024. "Judicial local protection and corporate litigation outcomes: A study based on legal big data," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    14. Pan, Xia & Cheng, Wenyin & Gao, Yuning, 2022. "The impact of privatization of state-owned enterprises on innovation in China: A tale of privatization degree," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Teixeira, João C.A. & Matos, Tiago F.A. & da Costa, Gui L.P. & Fortuna, Mário J.A., 2020. "Investor protection, regulation and bank risk-taking behavior," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    16. Shi, Xiaoxuan & Song, Yuchen & Wang, Xi, 2023. "Intellectual property rights enforcement and mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Fogel, Kathy & Morck, Randall & Yeung, Bernard, 2008. "Big business stability and economic growth: Is what's good for General Motors good for America?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 83-108, July.
    18. Maretno Harjoto & Indrarini Laksmana, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Risk Taking and Firm Value," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 353-373, August.
    19. Xiao, Gang, 2013. "Legal shareholder protection and corporate R&D investment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 240-266.
    20. Beltratti, Andrea & Paladino, Giovanna, 2013. "Why do banks optimize risk weights? The relevance of the cost of equity capital," MPRA Paper 46410, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Judicial independence; Growth investor; Business risks; Corporate innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:62:y:2024:i:pb:s1544612324002368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.