IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v20y2002i4p378-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formulating the Nature of Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Tranfield, David

Abstract

Despite significant successes and numerous exemplars of academic-practitioner collaboration, in recent times management research has been argued to have succumbed to a serious problem of relevance. Addressing this has become an important issue for both the academic and practitioner communities, and extensive debate is occurring on both sides of the Atlantic. Discussions have focused on the nature of management research itself, its key purposes and goals, the scope of the field, its boundaries and relations with other adjacent disciplines. Novel methods for the promotion of management research have also been part of the discussions. The possibility of developing a knowledge production system for management research based on the 'mode 2' ideas of Michael Gibbons et al. [Gibbons, M., Limoges, C. et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London] has attracted considerable attention. This paper outlines the background and current debates as introduction to the main studies in this special issue, which illustrate some of the experimentation being undertaken in creating innovative forms of management research.

Suggested Citation

  • Tranfield, David, 2002. "Formulating the Nature of Management Research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 378-382, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:20:y:2002:i:4:p:378-382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237302000579
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Samul, 2016. "Using the Methods in the Area of HRM: Capabilities and Limitations (Metody badawcze stosowane w obszarze ZZL: mozliwosci i ograniczenia)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(61), pages 155-166.
    2. Paul Shrivastava & Silvester Ivanaj & Sybil Persson, 2013. "Transdisciplinary Study of Sustainable Enterprise," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 230-244, May.
    3. Mersland, Roy, 2005. "The agenda and relevance of recent research in Microfinance," MPRA Paper 2433, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Dankó, Dávid, 2004. "Elválaszt, avagy összeköt?. A kísérletezés eltérő szerepe a közgazdaságtanban és a menedzsmenttudományokban [The differing role of experimentation in economics and in management studies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1073-1092.
    5. Katarzyna Susabowska, 2016. "Application of the Grounded Theory Methodology in HRM Research Within Private and Public Sector – An Attempt at a Meta-Analysis of Articles Published on the ISI Master Journal List Between 2010 and 20," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(61), pages 167-190.
    6. Andreas Birnik & Jon Billsberry, 2008. "Reorienting the Business School Agenda: The Case for Relevance, Rigor, and Righteousness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 985-999, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:20:y:2002:i:4:p:378-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.