IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v14y1996i3p215-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanisms for building and sustaining operations improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Upton, David

Abstract

It is no longer enough, it would seem, to know how to use operations as a competitive weapon, nor is it enough to 'continuously improve' those operations. The spoils of operations-based competition now go to those firms who can improve their operations fastest, and sustain that improvement over time. This fact is unlikely to go away. As the protective tissue separating the world's markets dissolves, firms everywhere have become more and more exposed to the power of those operations which have gone beyond 'world-class' - those who have learned how to improve more rapidly than the rest of the pack. The key is to develop a long-term improvement path - rather than glean quick-hits from the latest fad. This article by David Upton aims to provide some insight into the methods that can be deployed to build rapid and sustained improvement, by first looking at the recent history of operations improvement methods, then describing a new framework for mapping improvement paths and using it to characterize the strategies deployed by some of the world's fastest improvers. The first section presents a brief, recent history of operations improvement methods. The second section introduces a framework for describing some common starting points for building improvement. The third section describes key characteristics of successful improvement initiatives. The final section looks at ways in which firms sustain their performance growth, and describes three models of continuous improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Upton, David, 1996. "Mechanisms for building and sustaining operations improvement," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 215-228, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:14:y:1996:i:3:p:215-228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0263237396000023
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jha, Pradeep K. & Jha, Rakhi & Datt, Rajul & Guha, Sujoy K., 2011. "Entropy in good manufacturing system: Tool for quality assurance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 658-665, June.
    2. Glover, Wiljeana J. & Farris, Jennifer A. & Van Aken, Eileen M. & Doolen, Toni L., 2011. "Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 197-213, August.
    3. da Silveira, Giovani J. C., 2005. "Improving trade-offs in manufacturing: Method and illustration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 27-38, January.
    4. Thiago Lima de Barros & Rodrigo Sampaio Lopes, 2021. "Continuous improvement of imperfect maintenance actions in PAS and PAR models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(5), pages 941-958, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:14:y:1996:i:3:p:215-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.