IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v92y2022ics0149718922000143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying relative strength of methadone versus health and social services in comprehensive substance use disorder treatment using a variance decomposition approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shin, Hee-Choon
  • Marsh, Jeanne C.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the relative strengths of association of medication and health and social services in comprehensive substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Objectives: The study uses a novel variance decomposition method to assess the relative strength of association of six active ingredients of comprehensive SUD treatment: methadone medication, access services, SUD counseling, matched service ratio, client–provider relationship, and treatment duration.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin, Hee-Choon & Marsh, Jeanne C., 2022. "Identifying relative strength of methadone versus health and social services in comprehensive substance use disorder treatment using a variance decomposition approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:92:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000143
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922000143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Yu-An & Hedeker, Donald & Ryan, Joseph P. & Marsh, Jeanne C., 2020. "Longitudinal analysis of need-service matching for substance-involved parents in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Shin, Hee-Choon & Cao, Dingcai, 2010. "Gender differences in client-provider relationship as active ingredient in substance abuse treatment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 81-90, May.
    3. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Cao, Dingcai & Guerrero, Erick & Shin, Hee-Choon, 2009. "Need-service matching in substance abuse treatment: Racial/ethnic differences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 43-51, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amaro, Hortensia & Kong, Yinfei & Marsh, Jeanne C. & Khachikian, Tenie & Guerrero, Erick G., 2023. "Identifying gender differences in risk profiles and in opioid treatment outcomes in Los Angeles County," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Finno-Velasquez, Megan & Seay, Kristen D. & He, Amy S., 2016. "A national probability study of problematic substance use and treatment receipt among Latino caregivers involved with child welfare: The influence of nativity and legal status," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 61-67.
    2. Amaro, Hortensia & Kong, Yinfei & Marsh, Jeanne C. & Khachikian, Tenie & Guerrero, Erick G., 2023. "Identifying gender differences in risk profiles and in opioid treatment outcomes in Los Angeles County," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Kaye, Miranda P. & Faber, Aubrey & Davenport, Katie E. & Perkins, Daniel F., 2018. "Common components of evidence-informed home visitation programs for the prevention of child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 94-105.
    4. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2019. "Targeting services to reduce need after a child abuse investigation: Examining complex needs, matched services, and meaningful change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 386-394.
    5. Guerrero, Erick G. & Song, Ahyoung & Henwood, Benjamin & Kong, Yinfei & Kim, Tina, 2018. "Response to culturally competent drug treatment among homeless persons with different living arrangements," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 63-69.
    6. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Smith, Brenda D. & Bruni, Maria, 2011. "Integrated substance abuse and child welfare services for women: A progress review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 466-472, March.
    7. Lin, Qinyun & Kolak, Marynia & Watts, Beth & Anselin, Luc & Pollack, Harold & Schneider, John & Taylor, Bruce, 2022. "Individual, interpersonal, and neighborhood measures associated with opioid use stigma: Evidence from a nationally representative survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    8. Lin, Yu-An & Hedeker, Donald & Ryan, Joseph P. & Marsh, Jeanne C., 2020. "Longitudinal analysis of need-service matching for substance-involved parents in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2016. "Post-investigation service need and utilization among families at risk of maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 223-232.
    10. Cesar, Gabriel T & Decker, Scott H., 2020. "“CPS Sucks, but… I think I’m better off in the system:” Family, social support, & arts-based mentorship in child protective services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    11. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Shin, Hee-Choon & Cao, Dingcai, 2010. "Gender differences in client-provider relationship as active ingredient in substance abuse treatment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 81-90, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:92:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.