IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v89y2021ics0149718921000574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing centralized waiting lists for attachment to a primary care provider: Considerations from a logic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Breton, Mylaine
  • Smithman, Mélanie Ann
  • Kreindler, Sara A.
  • Jbilou, Jalila
  • Wong, Sabrina T.
  • Gard Marshall, Emily
  • Sasseville, Martin
  • Sutherland, Jason M.
  • Crooks, Valorie A.
  • Shaw, Jay
  • Contandriopoulos, Damien
  • Brousselle, Astrid
  • Green, Michael

Abstract

Access to a regular primary care provider is essential to quality care. In Canada, where 15 % of patients are unattached (i.e., without a regular provider), centralized waiting lists (CWLs) help attach patients to a primary care provider (family physician or nurse practitioner). Previous studies reveal mechanisms needed for CWLs to work, but focus mostly on CWLs for specialized health care. We aim to better understand how to design CWLs for unattached patients in primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Breton, Mylaine & Smithman, Mélanie Ann & Kreindler, Sara A. & Jbilou, Jalila & Wong, Sabrina T. & Gard Marshall, Emily & Sasseville, Martin & Sutherland, Jason M. & Crooks, Valorie A. & Shaw, Jay & C, 2021. "Designing centralized waiting lists for attachment to a primary care provider: Considerations from a logic analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:89:y:2021:i:c:s0149718921000574
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718921000574
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brousselle, Astrid & Champagne, François, 2011. "Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 69-78, February.
    2. Mariotti, Giuliano & Siciliani, Luigi & Rebba, Vincenzo & Fellini, Rita & Gentilini, Maria & Benea, Giorgio & Bertoli, Pierpaolo & Bistolfi, Lorenzo & Brugaletta, Salvatore & Camboa, Pierluigi & Casuc, 2014. "Waiting time prioritisation for specialist services in Italy: The homogeneous waiting time groups approach," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 54-63.
    3. McRae, Ian & Yen, Laurann & Gillespie, James & Douglas, Kirsty, 2011. "Patient affiliation with GPs in Australia—Who is and who is not and does it matter?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 16-23.
    4. Askildsen, Jan Erik & Holmås, Tor Helge & Kaarboe, Oddvar, 2010. "Prioritization and patients' rights: Analysing the effect of a reform in the Norwegian hospital sector," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 199-208, January.
    5. Aidem, Jeremy M., 2017. "Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(6), pages 683-690.
    6. Tremblay, Marie-Claude & Brousselle, Astrid & Richard, Lucie & Beaudet, Nicole, 2013. "Defining, illustrating and reflecting on logic analysis with an example from a professional development program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 64-73.
    7. Dew, Kevin & Cumming, Jacqueline & McLeod, Deborah & Morgan, Sonya & McKinlay, Eileen & Dowell, Anthony & Love, Tom, 2005. "Explicit rationing of elective services: implementing the New Zealand reforms," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Meliyanni Johar, 2014. "Are Waiting List Prioritization Guidelines Being Followed in Australia?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(8), pages 976-986, November.
    9. Damani, Zaheed & MacKean, Gail & Bohm, Eric & Noseworthy, Tom & Wang, Jenney Meng Han & DeMone, Brie & Wright, Brock & Marshall, Deborah A., 2018. "Insights from the design and implementation of a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement surgery: Critical success factors and unanticipated consequences," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 165-174.
    10. Oluwakemi A. Awe & Udoka Okpalauwaekwe & Adegboyega K. Lawal & Marcus M. Ilesanmi & Cindy Feng & Marwa Farag, 2019. "Association between patient attachment to a regular doctor and self‐perceived unmet health care needs in Canada: A population‐based analysis of the 2013 to 2014 Canadian community health surveys," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 309-323, January.
    11. Breton, Mylaine & Smithman, Mélanie Ann & Sasseville, Martin & Kreindler, Sara A. & Sutherland, Jason M. & Beauséjour, Marie & Green, Michael & Marshall, Emily Gard & Jbilou, Jalila & Shaw, Jay & Brou, 2020. "How the design and implementation of centralized waiting lists influence their use and effect on access to healthcare - A realist review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 787-795.
    12. Jan Erik Askildsen & Tor Helge Holmås & Oddvar Kaarboe, 2011. "Monitoring prioritisation in the public health‐care sector by use of medical guidelines. The case of Norway," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(8), pages 958-970, August.
    13. Lopatina, Elena & Damani, Zaheed & Bohm, Eric & Noseworthy, Tom W. & Conner-Spady, Barbara & MacKean, Gail & Simpson, Chris S. & Marshall, Deborah A., 2017. "Single-entry models (SEMs) for scheduled services: Towards a roadmap for the implementation of recommended practices," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(9), pages 963-970.
    14. Hudon, Catherine & Chouinard, Maud-Christine & Brousselle, Astrid & Bisson, Mathieu & Danish, Alya, 2020. "Evaluating complex interventions in real context: Logic analysis of a case management program for frequent users of healthcare services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Januleviciute, Jurgita & Askildsen, Jan Erik & Kaarboe, Oddvar & Holmås, Tor Helge & Sutton, Matt, 2013. "The impact of different prioritisation policies on waiting times: Case studies of Norway and Scotland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabián Silva-Aravena & Hugo Núñez Delafuente & César A. Astudillo, 2022. "A Novel Strategy to Classify Chronic Patients at Risk: A Hybrid Machine Learning Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Breton, Mylaine & Smithman, Mélanie Ann & Sasseville, Martin & Kreindler, Sara A. & Sutherland, Jason M. & Beauséjour, Marie & Green, Michael & Marshall, Emily Gard & Jbilou, Jalila & Shaw, Jay & Brou, 2020. "How the design and implementation of centralized waiting lists influence their use and effect on access to healthcare - A realist review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 787-795.
    2. Gutacker, Nils & Siciliani, Luigi & Cookson, Richard, 2016. "Waiting time prioritisation: Evidence from England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 140-151.
    3. Carlsen, Fredrik & Kaarboe, Oddvar Martin, 2015. "The relationship between educational attainment and waiting time among the elderly in Norway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(11), pages 1450-1458.
    4. Johansson, Kjell Arne & Nygaard, Elizabeth & Herlofsen, Berit & Lindemark, Frode, 2017. "Implementation of the 2013 amended Patients’ Rights Act in Norway: Clinical priority guidelines and access to specialised health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(4), pages 346-353.
    5. Desjardins, Émilie & Sultan-Taïeb, Hélène & St-Hilaire, France & Vézina, Nicole & Ledoux, Élise & Naji, Rita & Bélanger, Patricia, 2023. "Implementation process evaluation of an ergonomic train the trainer program: How to learn from mechanisms and the temporal structure of processes?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Januleviciute, Jurgita & Askildsen, Jan Erik & Kaarboe, Oddvar & Holmås, Tor Helge & Sutton, Matt, 2013. "The impact of different prioritisation policies on waiting times: Case studies of Norway and Scotland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-6.
    7. Oddvar Kaarboe & Fredrik Carlsen, 2014. "Waiting Times And Socioeconomic Status. Evidence From Norway," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 93-107, January.
    8. Nikolova, Silviya & Sinko, Arthur & Sutton, Matt, 2015. "Do maximum waiting times guarantees change clinical priorities for elective treatment? Evidence from Scotland," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 72-88.
    9. Anton Isaacs & Alistair Bonsey & Danielle Couch, 2023. "Centralized Intake Models and Recommendations for Their Use in Non-Acute Mental Health Services: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Cartier, Yuri & Benmarhnia, Tarik & Brousselle, Astrid, 2015. "Tool for assessing health and equity impacts of interventions modifying air quality in urban environments," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Hudon, Catherine & Chouinard, Maud-Christine & Brousselle, Astrid & Bisson, Mathieu & Danish, Alya, 2020. "Evaluating complex interventions in real context: Logic analysis of a case management program for frequent users of healthcare services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    13. Deane, Kelsey L. & Harré, Niki, 2014. "Program theory-driven evaluation science in a youth development context," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 61-70.
    14. Giliberto Capano & Benedetto Lepori, 2024. "Designing policies that could work: understanding the interaction between policy design spaces and organizational responses in public sector," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 53-82, March.
    15. Tessa Peasgood & Jill Carlton & John Brazier, 2019. "A Qualitative Study of the Views of Health and Social Care Decision-Makers on the Role of Wellbeing in Resource Allocation Decisions in the UK," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi & Nieuwenhuis, Sonja & Ologun, Adesoji & Mortimore, Gordon & Mpakateni, Martin, 2019. "Embedding value-for-money in practice: A case study of a health pooled fund programme implemented in conflict-affected South Sudan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Januleviciute, Jurgita & Askildsen, Jan Erik & Holmås, Tor Helge & Kaarbøe, Oddvar & Sutton, Matt, 2010. "The Impact of Different Prioritisation Policies on Waiting Times: A Comparative Analysis of Norway and Scotland," Working Papers in Economics 07/10, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    18. Harman, Elena & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "Towards program theory validation: Crowdsourcing the qualitative analysis of participant experiences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 183-194.
    19. Toby Newstead & Sarah Dawkins & Rob Macklin & Angela Martin, 2020. "The Virtues Project: An Approach to Developing Good Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 605-622, December.
    20. Cobelli, Nicola & Cassia, Fabio & Burro, Roberto, 2021. "Factors affecting the choices of adoption/non-adoption of future technologies during coronavirus pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:89:y:2021:i:c:s0149718921000574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.