IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v83y2020ics0149718920301518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process evaluation of the ‘Singapore Physical Activity and Nutrition Study’

Author

Listed:
  • Wong, Elaine Yee-Sing
  • Lee, Andy H.
  • James, Anthony P.
  • Jancey, Jonine

Abstract

The Singapore Physical Activity and Nutrition Study (SPANS) aimed to improve the physical activity (PA) and nutrition behaviours of Singaporean women aged 50 years and over. The SPANS program consisted of PA classes, nutrition workshops, telephone dietary counselling, health booklets, a health calendar and program ambassadors. This study aimed to assess and understand the implementation of the program strategies and gain insight into process evaluation components to inform future programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wong, Elaine Yee-Sing & Lee, Andy H. & James, Anthony P. & Jancey, Jonine, 2020. "Process evaluation of the ‘Singapore Physical Activity and Nutrition Study’," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:83:y:2020:i:c:s0149718920301518
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718920301518
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saunders, Ruth P. & Wilcox, Sara & Baruth, Meghan & Dowda, Marsha, 2014. "Process evaluation methods, implementation fidelity results and relationship to physical activity and healthy eating in the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 93-102.
    2. Tran, Van Dinh & Jancey, Jonine & Lee, Andy & James, Anthony & Howat, Peter & Thi Phuong Mai, Le, 2017. "Physical activity and nutrition program for adults with metabolic syndrome: Process evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 128-133.
    3. Siobhan M. White & Thomas R. Wójcicki & Edward McAuley, 2012. "Social Cognitive Influences on Physical Activity Behavior in Middle-Aged and Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(1), pages 18-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marlene Rosager Lund Pedersen & Anne Faber Hansen & Karsten Elmose-Østerlund, 2021. "Motives and Barriers Related to Physical Activity and Sport across Social Backgrounds: Implications for Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Harmon, Brook E. & San Diego, Emily Rose N. & Pichon, Latrice C. & Powell, Terrinieka W. & Rugless, Fedoria & West, Nathan T. & Minor, Lottie & McNeal, Sterling & McCann, Lauren & Hales, Lauren S. & D, 2022. "Congregational health needs by key demographic variables: Findings from a congregational health needs assessment tool," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Elizabeth A. Richards & Stephanie Woodcox, 2021. "Barriers and Motivators to Physical Activity Prior to Starting a Community-Based Walking Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Egan, Cate A. & Webster, Collin & Weaver, R. Glenn & Brian, Ali & Stodden, David & Russ, Laura & Nesbitt, Danielle & Vazou, Spyridoula, 2018. "Partnerships for Active Children in Elementary Schools (PACES): First year process evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 61-69.
    5. Marieke De Craemer & Vera Verbestel & Maïté Verloigne & Odysseas Androutsos & Luis Moreno & Violeta Iotova & Berthold Koletzko & Piotr Socha & Yannis Manios & Greet Cardon, 2020. "Combining Effect and Process Evaluation on European Preschool Children’s Snacking Behavior in a Kindergarten-Based, Family-Involved Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: The ToyBox Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Xuefang Zou & Sumaira Kayani & Jin Wang & Muhammad Imran & María Luisa Zagalaz Sánchez & Lara Sánchez Amador Jesús & Haroona Qurban, 2019. "A Study on the Relationship between Urban Residents’ Perception of Recreational Sports and Their Participation in Recreational Sports: Based on Gender Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:83:y:2020:i:c:s0149718920301518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.